Originally posted by defenderDX:I actually would be fine with that as well. If we put JG in there as a starter, and he won us a couple games, that actually would be cool.
Because there would be a point to it.
Agreed
There are 198 users in the forums
Originally posted by defenderDX:I actually would be fine with that as well. If we put JG in there as a starter, and he won us a couple games, that actually would be cool.
Because there would be a point to it.
Originally posted by thl408:maybe set up one of these ?
It's a hypothetical question anyways. This team ain't winning 7 games in a row. Come on now.
Originally posted by thl408:
It's a hypothetical question anyways. This team ain't winning 7 games in a row. Come on now.
Originally posted by cciowa:The chances of your scenario and winning 7 games are pretty much the same.
Originally posted by thl408:
It's a hypothetical question anyways. This team ain't winning 7 games in a row. Come on now.
everyone knows that but the question was asked. in my opinion the team has a better chance to not win any more games. no matter who the qb is. and then i hope we get that top pick and turn it into a bunch of picks to address the multiple holes on our roster
Originally posted by tjd808185:
This isn't the NBA where Lebron flips you. At the 11th pick you can still land Patrick Willis. Only time I'd consider sucking for a pick is if you have no qb with a great prospect coming up.
Originally posted by Ensatsu:It's not that I'd be mad at the team winning, it's that I would be happy whether they won or lost. In this rebuild process, I can easily see the bright side to losing because I know that the team needs many more good players. With a top3 pick and a possible QBotF on board, it gives the front office that option to maneuver around. It's only been one draft, but they've shown that with ammo they will slide around the draft board to trade out, or trade up.
This is just my opinion but, if we are honestly looking at G like Quenton Nelson or something, then it doesn't really matter if we draft in the top 10.
Guards don't usually go that high. Teams want sexy positions in the top 10 like LT, QB, WR, EDGE rusher. Maybe RB.
Plus we have plenty of needs. I don't think there are many positions that fans wouldn't be happy with. Except maybe Interior DT for the 4th year in a row
I'd like a top 3 pick, only for the option of trading down for more picks. But if it doesn't happen and we win games, I won't be too mad about it. Not sure why fans want to be mad at team's success.
Originally posted by susweel:if lynch and kyle are who people say they are and who we have been told they are.. they will be able to pick a top tier guy no matter where we draft
I've changed my view on this I would take the 7-9 record and enjoy those seven wins throughout the year then worry about the draft later. The draft is a complete crap shoot anyways 40% of the first round is usually busts.
Originally posted by thl408:
It's not that I'd be mad at the team winning, it's that I would be happy whether they won or lost. In this rebuild process, I can easily see the bright side to losing because I know that the team needs many more good players. With a top3 pick and a possible QBotF on board, it gives the front office that option to maneuver around. It's only been one draft, but they've shown that with ammo they will slide around the draft board to trade out, or trade up.
Originally posted by cciowa:How odd. I was told Lynch is just a good speaker and doesn't know how to address needs in the offseason. All he does is set around making nice speeches.
Originally posted by susweel:if lynch and kyle are who people say they are and who we have been told they are.. they will be able to pick a top tier guy no matter where we draft
I've changed my view on this I would take the 7-9 record and enjoy those seven wins throughout the year then worry about the draft later. The draft is a complete crap shoot anyways 40% of the first round is usually busts.