Keep in mind Jed York is a business man, he is not a football man, he cares about ROI | Page 6

9erred · 2017-10-14T12:49:53-07:00

The Cleveland Browns and SF 49ers both have 62 million dollars in cap space for 2017. The Niners will have 95 million dollars in cap space for 2019. Jed York is raking in the money for 2017 by not spending on players, reaping TV revenue, and ticket revenue while producing an expansion team. One of the few perenial pro bowlers is a tad bit slow, cut him now, save money to make a bigger profit. Whatever happened to having building blocks. This team has been in continuous re building mode since Jed took over. When are fans going to realize it is about the profits, concerts at levis stadium and 49ers franchise value?? 1. When the team signed Hoyer to be the qb, then did not draft a qb until round 3, is that a hint? 2. When the team signed a FB to a record breaking deal?? 3. When the team could have signed Alex Mack to C and Mitchell Schwartz to guard, instead they bring in second tier WR's?? I am just venting, but when a team has cap space, and chooses not to use it, they are not trying to be competitive.

Oct 16, 2017 at 11:18 AM

#76

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 72,640

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

No it doesn't.

League wide all teams need to spend at least 95% of the cap. Per team is 89%. Only way money is distributed back to the players is if the league wide min is not met.

Story problem time.

Rams have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $995 on some Jimmy Johns.
49ers have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $890 on subway.

How much did Jed save by buying subway?

lol
None, And nothing has been getting pocketed as we have been rolling it over, all of it

It's unused funds. We put this to bed like two years ago when you guys were arguing about it in the AB thread.
yeah it's Rolled over

In bold up there, what you said is 100% false.

They can choose to roll over some or none or all depending how they want to manipulate the cap.

Shared revenue is the combined avg of 31 teams. Plus the Cowboys revenue.

if it was false then they don't need to roll over anything even if they met the 89%

Oct 16, 2017 at 11:28 AM

#77

SoCold
Hall of Dumb
Posts: 133,060

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

No it doesn't.

League wide all teams need to spend at least 95% of the cap. Per team is 89%. Only way money is distributed back to the players is if the league wide min is not met.

Story problem time.

Rams have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $995 on some Jimmy Johns.
49ers have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $890 on subway.

How much did Jed save by buying subway?

lol
None, And nothing has been getting pocketed as we have been rolling it over, all of it

It's unused funds. We put this to bed like two years ago when you guys were arguing about it in the AB thread.
yeah it's Rolled over

In bold up there, what you said is 100% false.

They can choose to roll over some or none or all depending how they want to manipulate the cap.

Shared revenue is the combined avg of 31 teams. Plus the Cowboys revenue.
if it was false then they don't need to roll over anything even if they met the 89%

Yeah that's exactly how it is. Most teams are well over the spending min. Only six teams have $20m in cap space right now.

It's why the Rams only rolled over $300k while the 49ers rolled over $38m

lol

Oct 16, 2017 at 11:30 AM

#78

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 72,640

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

No it doesn't.

League wide all teams need to spend at least 95% of the cap. Per team is 89%. Only way money is distributed back to the players is if the league wide min is not met.

Story problem time.

Rams have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $995 on some Jimmy Johns.
49ers have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $890 on subway.

How much did Jed save by buying subway?

lol
None, And nothing has been getting pocketed as we have been rolling it over, all of it

It's unused funds. We put this to bed like two years ago when you guys were arguing about it in the AB thread.
yeah it's Rolled over

In bold up there, what you said is 100% false.

They can choose to roll over some or none or all depending how they want to manipulate the cap.

Shared revenue is the combined avg of 31 teams. Plus the Cowboys revenue.
if it was false then they don't need to roll over anything even if they met the 89%

Yeah that's exactly how it is. Most teams are well over the spending min. Only six teams have $20m in cap space right now.

It's why the Rams only rolled over $300k while the 49ers rolled over $38m

lol

what?

Rams rolled over 300k when they could have just pocketed it ?

Oct 16, 2017 at 11:35 AM

#79

miked1978
Veteran
Posts: 12,580

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Money not spent, stays with the Yorks. That is how privately owned businesses work.

So its kind of like when your wife starts harping on you because you don't want to buy the new $60k minivan because you think the minivan you bought 3 years ago still gets the job done. You have the money and she knows it but you don't want to spend it for whatever reason.

So in essence you are the wife.

Oct 16, 2017 at 11:41 AM

#80

SoCold
Hall of Dumb
Posts: 133,060

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

No it doesn't.

League wide all teams need to spend at least 95% of the cap. Per team is 89%. Only way money is distributed back to the players is if the league wide min is not met.

Story problem time.

Rams have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $995 on some Jimmy Johns.
49ers have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $890 on subway.

How much did Jed save by buying subway?

lol
None, And nothing has been getting pocketed as we have been rolling it over, all of it

It's unused funds. We put this to bed like two years ago when you guys were arguing about it in the AB thread.
yeah it's Rolled over

In bold up there, what you said is 100% false.

They can choose to roll over some or none or all depending how they want to manipulate the cap.

Shared revenue is the combined avg of 31 teams. Plus the Cowboys revenue.
if it was false then they don't need to roll over anything even if they met the 89%

Yeah that's exactly how it is. Most teams are well over the spending min. Only six teams have $20m in cap space right now.

It's why the Rams only rolled over $300k while the 49ers rolled over $38m

lol
what?

Rams rolled over 300k when they could have just pocketed it ?

The point is the Rams were close to the cap limit and only rolled over what they wanted to. Because they already used most of their limit.

This is an example of a team using 99% of it's cap space. While the 49ers use 89%.

The money is either a used fund or unused fund. If you love the word pocket do this, meaning it either leaves the teams "pocket" or it says in the teams "pocket". It doesn't ever leave the "pocket" and then come back to the "pocket".

lol

Oct 16, 2017 at 11:47 AM

#81

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 72,640

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

No it doesn't.

League wide all teams need to spend at least 95% of the cap. Per team is 89%. Only way money is distributed back to the players is if the league wide min is not met.

Story problem time.

Rams have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $995 on some Jimmy Johns.
49ers have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $890 on subway.

How much did Jed save by buying subway?

lol
None, And nothing has been getting pocketed as we have been rolling it over, all of it

It's unused funds. We put this to bed like two years ago when you guys were arguing about it in the AB thread.
yeah it's Rolled over

In bold up there, what you said is 100% false.

They can choose to roll over some or none or all depending how they want to manipulate the cap.

Shared revenue is the combined avg of 31 teams. Plus the Cowboys revenue.
if it was false then they don't need to roll over anything even if they met the 89%

Yeah that's exactly how it is. Most teams are well over the spending min. Only six teams have $20m in cap space right now.

It's why the Rams only rolled over $300k while the 49ers rolled over $38m

lol
what?

Rams rolled over 300k when they could have just pocketed it ?

The point is the Rams were close to the cap limit and only rolled over what they wanted to. Because they already used most of their limit.

This is an example of a team using 99% of it's cap space. While the 49ers use 89%.

The money is either a used fund or unused fund. If you love the word pocket do this, meaning it either leaves the teams "pocket" or it says in the teams "pocket". It doesn't ever leave the "pocket" and then come back to the "pocket".

lol

whats the lol for.

and Funds ?

Oct 16, 2017 at 11:49 AM

#82

SoCold
Hall of Dumb
Posts: 133,060

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

No it doesn't.

League wide all teams need to spend at least 95% of the cap. Per team is 89%. Only way money is distributed back to the players is if the league wide min is not met.

Story problem time.

Rams have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $995 on some Jimmy Johns.
49ers have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $890 on subway.

How much did Jed save by buying subway?

lol
None, And nothing has been getting pocketed as we have been rolling it over, all of it

It's unused funds. We put this to bed like two years ago when you guys were arguing about it in the AB thread.
yeah it's Rolled over

In bold up there, what you said is 100% false.

They can choose to roll over some or none or all depending how they want to manipulate the cap.

Shared revenue is the combined avg of 31 teams. Plus the Cowboys revenue.
if it was false then they don't need to roll over anything even if they met the 89%

Yeah that's exactly how it is. Most teams are well over the spending min. Only six teams have $20m in cap space right now.

It's why the Rams only rolled over $300k while the 49ers rolled over $38m

lol
what?

Rams rolled over 300k when they could have just pocketed it ?

The point is the Rams were close to the cap limit and only rolled over what they wanted to. Because they already used most of their limit.

This is an example of a team using 99% of it's cap space. While the 49ers use 89%.

The money is either a used fund or unused fund. If you love the word pocket do this, meaning it either leaves the teams "pocket" or it says in the teams "pocket". It doesn't ever leave the "pocket" and then come back to the "pocket".

lol
whats the lol for.

and Funds ?

Cause for some reason you can't just say oh, ok. I got it now. You keep talking in circles when you're wrong about something.

Oct 16, 2017 at 11:53 AM

#83

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 72,640

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

No it doesn't.

League wide all teams need to spend at least 95% of the cap. Per team is 89%. Only way money is distributed back to the players is if the league wide min is not met.

Story problem time.

Rams have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $995 on some Jimmy Johns.
49ers have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $890 on subway.

How much did Jed save by buying subway?

lol
None, And nothing has been getting pocketed as we have been rolling it over, all of it

It's unused funds. We put this to bed like two years ago when you guys were arguing about it in the AB thread.
yeah it's Rolled over

In bold up there, what you said is 100% false.

They can choose to roll over some or none or all depending how they want to manipulate the cap.

Shared revenue is the combined avg of 31 teams. Plus the Cowboys revenue.
if it was false then they don't need to roll over anything even if they met the 89%

Yeah that's exactly how it is. Most teams are well over the spending min. Only six teams have $20m in cap space right now.

It's why the Rams only rolled over $300k while the 49ers rolled over $38m

lol
what?

Rams rolled over 300k when they could have just pocketed it ?

The point is the Rams were close to the cap limit and only rolled over what they wanted to. Because they already used most of their limit.

This is an example of a team using 99% of it's cap space. While the 49ers use 89%.

The money is either a used fund or unused fund. If you love the word pocket do this, meaning it either leaves the teams "pocket" or it says in the teams "pocket". It doesn't ever leave the "pocket" and then come back to the "pocket".

lol
whats the lol for.

and Funds ?

Cause for some reason you can't just say oh, ok. I got it now. You keep talking in circles when you're wrong about something.

You are not following. The team doesn't "pocket" Woos word. Teams need to roll over any amount or lose it.

Oct 16, 2017 at 12:08 PM

#84

SoCold
Hall of Dumb
Posts: 133,060

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

No it doesn't.

League wide all teams need to spend at least 95% of the cap. Per team is 89%. Only way money is distributed back to the players is if the league wide min is not met.

Story problem time.

Rams have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $995 on some Jimmy Johns.
49ers have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $890 on subway.

How much did Jed save by buying subway?

lol
None, And nothing has been getting pocketed as we have been rolling it over, all of it

It's unused funds. We put this to bed like two years ago when you guys were arguing about it in the AB thread.
yeah it's Rolled over

In bold up there, what you said is 100% false.

They can choose to roll over some or none or all depending how they want to manipulate the cap.

Shared revenue is the combined avg of 31 teams. Plus the Cowboys revenue.
if it was false then they don't need to roll over anything even if they met the 89%

Yeah that's exactly how it is. Most teams are well over the spending min. Only six teams have $20m in cap space right now.

It's why the Rams only rolled over $300k while the 49ers rolled over $38m

lol
what?

Rams rolled over 300k when they could have just pocketed it ?

The point is the Rams were close to the cap limit and only rolled over what they wanted to. Because they already used most of their limit.

This is an example of a team using 99% of it's cap space. While the 49ers use 89%.

The money is either a used fund or unused fund. If you love the word pocket do this, meaning it either leaves the teams "pocket" or it says in the teams "pocket". It doesn't ever leave the "pocket" and then come back to the "pocket".

lol
whats the lol for.

and Funds ?

Cause for some reason you can't just say oh, ok. I got it now. You keep talking in circles when you're wrong about something.
You are not following. The team doesn't "pocket" Woos word. Teams need to roll over any amount or lose it.

You are not following. Never said they did pocket it. Others have. That's wrong. They don't need to roll over. They can. It's not lost. It's just unused.

Paraag has manipulated the cap to spend the second least amount over the last few years. This is why they have the second most to spend in cap space. It's pretty simple.

Oct 16, 2017 at 12:23 PM

#85

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 72,640

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

No it doesn't.

League wide all teams need to spend at least 95% of the cap. Per team is 89%. Only way money is distributed back to the players is if the league wide min is not met.

Story problem time.

Rams have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $995 on some Jimmy Johns.
49ers have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $890 on subway.

How much did Jed save by buying subway?

lol
None, And nothing has been getting pocketed as we have been rolling it over, all of it

It's unused funds. We put this to bed like two years ago when you guys were arguing about it in the AB thread.
yeah it's Rolled over

In bold up there, what you said is 100% false.

They can choose to roll over some or none or all depending how they want to manipulate the cap.

Shared revenue is the combined avg of 31 teams. Plus the Cowboys revenue.
if it was false then they don't need to roll over anything even if they met the 89%

Yeah that's exactly how it is. Most teams are well over the spending min. Only six teams have $20m in cap space right now.

It's why the Rams only rolled over $300k while the 49ers rolled over $38m

lol
what?

Rams rolled over 300k when they could have just pocketed it ?

The point is the Rams were close to the cap limit and only rolled over what they wanted to. Because they already used most of their limit.

This is an example of a team using 99% of it's cap space. While the 49ers use 89%.

The money is either a used fund or unused fund. If you love the word pocket do this, meaning it either leaves the teams "pocket" or it says in the teams "pocket". It doesn't ever leave the "pocket" and then come back to the "pocket".

lol
whats the lol for.

and Funds ?

Cause for some reason you can't just say oh, ok. I got it now. You keep talking in circles when you're wrong about something.
You are not following. The team doesn't "pocket" Woos word. Teams need to roll over any amount or lose it.

You are not following. Never said they did pocket it. Others have. That's wrong. They don't need to roll over. They can. It's not lost. It's just unused.

Paraag has manipulated the cap to spend the second least amount over the last few years. This is why they have the second most to spend in cap space. It's pretty simple.

so where was i wrong. These "unused funds" are only kept and remained unused if the team rolls it over

Oct 16, 2017 at 12:36 PM

#86

SoCold
Hall of Dumb
Posts: 133,060

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

No it doesn't.

League wide all teams need to spend at least 95% of the cap. Per team is 89%. Only way money is distributed back to the players is if the league wide min is not met.

Story problem time.

Rams have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $995 on some Jimmy Johns.
49ers have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $890 on subway.

How much did Jed save by buying subway?

lol
None, And nothing has been getting pocketed as we have been rolling it over, all of it

It's unused funds. We put this to bed like two years ago when you guys were arguing about it in the AB thread.
yeah it's Rolled over

In bold up there, what you said is 100% false.

They can choose to roll over some or none or all depending how they want to manipulate the cap.

Shared revenue is the combined avg of 31 teams. Plus the Cowboys revenue.
if it was false then they don't need to roll over anything even if they met the 89%

Yeah that's exactly how it is. Most teams are well over the spending min. Only six teams have $20m in cap space right now.

It's why the Rams only rolled over $300k while the 49ers rolled over $38m

lol
what?

Rams rolled over 300k when they could have just pocketed it ?

The point is the Rams were close to the cap limit and only rolled over what they wanted to. Because they already used most of their limit.

This is an example of a team using 99% of it's cap space. While the 49ers use 89%.

The money is either a used fund or unused fund. If you love the word pocket do this, meaning it either leaves the teams "pocket" or it says in the teams "pocket". It doesn't ever leave the "pocket" and then come back to the "pocket".

lol
whats the lol for.

and Funds ?

Cause for some reason you can't just say oh, ok. I got it now. You keep talking in circles when you're wrong about something.
You are not following. The team doesn't "pocket" Woos word. Teams need to roll over any amount or lose it.

You are not following. Never said they did pocket it. Others have. That's wrong. They don't need to roll over. They can. It's not lost. It's just unused.

Paraag has manipulated the cap to spend the second least amount over the last few years. This is why they have the second most to spend in cap space. It's pretty simple.
so where was i wrong. These "unused funds" are only kept and remained unused if the team rolls it over

Just because a team chooses to spend 90% doesn't mean the rest is automatically rolled over.
The team has to decide how much they want to add to the next years cap space if any.

As long as the min % are met nothing gets distributed back to the league if a % is not used. It's a sum added or subtracted to get to a adjusted cap. That's why each teams adjusted cap number is different from the $167m the league set.

Oct 16, 2017 at 1:00 PM

#87

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 72,640

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

No it doesn't.

League wide all teams need to spend at least 95% of the cap. Per team is 89%. Only way money is distributed back to the players is if the league wide min is not met.

Story problem time.

Rams have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $995 on some Jimmy Johns.
49ers have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $890 on subway.

How much did Jed save by buying subway?

lol
None, And nothing has been getting pocketed as we have been rolling it over, all of it

It's unused funds. We put this to bed like two years ago when you guys were arguing about it in the AB thread.
yeah it's Rolled over

In bold up there, what you said is 100% false.

They can choose to roll over some or none or all depending how they want to manipulate the cap.

Shared revenue is the combined avg of 31 teams. Plus the Cowboys revenue.
if it was false then they don't need to roll over anything even if they met the 89%

Yeah that's exactly how it is. Most teams are well over the spending min. Only six teams have $20m in cap space right now.

It's why the Rams only rolled over $300k while the 49ers rolled over $38m

lol
what?

Rams rolled over 300k when they could have just pocketed it ?

The point is the Rams were close to the cap limit and only rolled over what they wanted to. Because they already used most of their limit.

This is an example of a team using 99% of it's cap space. While the 49ers use 89%.

The money is either a used fund or unused fund. If you love the word pocket do this, meaning it either leaves the teams "pocket" or it says in the teams "pocket". It doesn't ever leave the "pocket" and then come back to the "pocket".

lol
whats the lol for.

and Funds ?

Cause for some reason you can't just say oh, ok. I got it now. You keep talking in circles when you're wrong about something.
You are not following. The team doesn't "pocket" Woos word. Teams need to roll over any amount or lose it.

You are not following. Never said they did pocket it. Others have. That's wrong. They don't need to roll over. They can. It's not lost. It's just unused.

Paraag has manipulated the cap to spend the second least amount over the last few years. This is why they have the second most to spend in cap space. It's pretty simple.
so where was i wrong. These "unused funds" are only kept and remained unused if the team rolls it over

Just because a team chooses to spend 90% doesn't mean the rest is automatically rolled over.
The team has to decide how much they want to add to the next years cap space if any.

As long as the min % are met nothing gets distributed back to the league if a % is not used. It's a sum added or subtracted to get to a adjusted cap. That's why each teams adjusted cap number is different from the $167m the league set.

Revenue is revenue. and this type of Rev it's shared.

Oct 16, 2017 at 1:40 PM

#88

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 72,640

Originally posted by pahlerbj:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

No it doesn't.

League wide all teams need to spend at least 95% of the cap. Per team is 89%. Only way money is distributed back to the players is if the league wide min is not met.

Story problem time.

Rams have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $995 on some Jimmy Johns.
49ers have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $890 on subway.

How much did Jed save by buying subway?

lol
None, And nothing has been getting pocketed as we have been rolling it over, all of it

It's unused funds. We put this to bed like two years ago when you guys were arguing about it in the AB thread.
yeah it's Rolled over

In bold up there, what you said is 100% false.

They can choose to roll over some or none or all depending how they want to manipulate the cap.

Shared revenue is the combined avg of 31 teams. Plus the Cowboys revenue.
if it was false then they don't need to roll over anything even if they met the 89%

Yeah that's exactly how it is. Most teams are well over the spending min. Only six teams have $20m in cap space right now.

It's why the Rams only rolled over $300k while the 49ers rolled over $38m

lol
what?

Rams rolled over 300k when they could have just pocketed it ?

The point is the Rams were close to the cap limit and only rolled over what they wanted to. Because they already used most of their limit.

This is an example of a team using 99% of it's cap space. While the 49ers use 89%.

The money is either a used fund or unused fund. If you love the word pocket do this, meaning it either leaves the teams "pocket" or it says in the teams "pocket". It doesn't ever leave the "pocket" and then come back to the "pocket".

lol
whats the lol for.

and Funds ?

Cause for some reason you can't just say oh, ok. I got it now. You keep talking in circles when you're wrong about something.
You are not following. The team doesn't "pocket" Woos word. Teams need to roll over any amount or lose it.

You are not following. Never said they did pocket it. Others have. That's wrong. They don't need to roll over. They can. It's not lost. It's just unused.

Paraag has manipulated the cap to spend the second least amount over the last few years. This is why they have the second most to spend in cap space. It's pretty simple.
so where was i wrong. These "unused funds" are only kept and remained unused if the team rolls it over

Just because a team chooses to spend 90% doesn't mean the rest is automatically rolled over.
The team has to decide how much they want to add to the next years cap space if any.

As long as the min % are met nothing gets distributed back to the league if a % is not used. It's a sum added or subtracted to get to a adjusted cap. That's why each teams adjusted cap number is different from the $167m the league set.
Revenue is revenue. and this type of Rev it's shared.

I can't read the original post lol

i know, my eyes

Oct 16, 2017 at 1:57 PM

#89

InsertNameHere
Veteran
Posts: 85

Which is it

York is cheap for not using all of the cap

York cares so much he still has every head coach from Walsh to Chip on the payroll

Oct 16, 2017 at 2:31 PM

#90

Niners99
Veteran
Posts: 44,267

He ate like 60 million in failed 1-and-done coaches. Obviously he cares about winning more than making money. York is a dork, dont get me wrong, but he would've just stuck with Tomsula or Chip Kelly if he wanted to be a cheapskate.