Originally posted by Antix:A 2-14 team talking bout dynasties.
[ Edited by cNiner on Jun 5, 2017 at 3:09 AM ]
There are 246 users in the forums
Originally posted by Antix:A 2-14 team talking bout dynasties.
Originally posted by English:
Well, I think there is some justification in talking dynasty. We have, for the first time in many years, an organisation who is thinking in the long term, planning in the long term and building in the long term.
Originally posted by NickSh49:Originally posted by English:Well, I think there is some justification in talking dynasty. We have, for the first time in many years, an organisation who is thinking in the long term, planning in the long term and building in the long term.
Baby steps man. You don't start talking dynasty until you actually win a Super Bowl. We clown Seahawk fans for talking dynasty after 1 SB, and now we're talking a new 49ers dynasty before the new regime even takes a snap?
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by NickSh49:
Originally posted by English:
Well, I think there is some justification in talking dynasty. We have, for the first time in many years, an organisation who is thinking in the long term, planning in the long term and building in the long term.
Baby steps man. You don't start talking dynasty until you actually win a Super Bowl. We clown Seahawk fans for talking dynasty after 1 SB, and now we're talking a new 49ers dynasty before the new regime even takes a snap?
Having seen this place awash with misery, cynicism and pessimism for an age I see no problem with a little optimism. I really dont care what Seahawk fans think of us. But the point is not that we need to wait until we win one. The point is, at last, we have an organisation which is building for extended future success.
Originally posted by English:There is justification in being optimistic about becoming competitive again. That is wildly, wildly different than using the "d" word.
Well, I think there is some justification in talking dynasty. We have, for the first time in many years, an organisation who is thinking in the long term, planning in the long term and building in the long term.
Originally posted by theduke85:
Originally posted by English:There is justification in being optimistic about becoming competitive again. That is wildly, wildly different than using the "d" word.
Well, I think there is some justification in talking dynasty. We have, for the first time in many years, an organisation who is thinking in the long term, planning in the long term and building in the long term.
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
Originally posted by NCommand:
LOL...while way premature at this point, that was not the point of the article. I didn't get the impression it was meant to be taken literal but rather, noting similarities to past dynasty elements, something even Peter King noted in the draft process.
Will history retreat itself? Who knows...