Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Originally posted by OnTheClock:
Originally posted by Afrikan:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Kyle's story makes more sense than the original one that said the woman crossed the line. If that was true and she had caused an injury accident she would have been cited. I imagine that Kyle wasn't cited because the woman wasn't injured at all and the insurance companies can take care of the damage to the cars.
It did seem weird that both had a head-on collision, but she wasn't injured... in comparison to Kyle who got hurt bad. But then I'm reading a report that she actually was considered injuried when the call first went in. But I'm waiting for more to come out of that, before totally believing it.
He said he was only going 20 mph, that's likely why. Airbags can deploy even at low speed, but definitely if she hit him harder, it'd make sense.
There are too many people immediately screaming conspiracy anytime something happens nowadays... Locked in the pervasive social media mindset of refusing to believe anything can be as basic as it really is.
Can't overthink everything..
Kyle hasn't changed his story. He just told his side of it after eading that it was incorrectly reported that the other driver crossed the center line. This is what happens when the media is in a rush to get he scoop. Every news outlet is struggling for readers or likes. That's how they make money and stay in business. The days of vetting stories before posting them are gone. In rthis case we had an incorrect police report followed by an incorrect media report followed by incorrect posts by us on this website.
Am I correct?
One clarification- the police report was accurate in Kyle being at fault. It was the collision report that had the error of the girl being at fault.

ok will knock it off now lol