49ers Head Coach Kyle Shanahan Thread

Originally posted by lamontb:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by MucketyMuck:
So does Kyle find a new Deebo or does he take the element out of the offense? I'm kind of hoping for the latter.

No more Deebo, we have CMC. Get WRs who can beat man or play well vs zone.

Deboo and JJ are good versus zone. Issue is since the SB teams.have figured our scheme just struggles versus man. Thus every good game si lnce has been versus teams playing zone. Teams play man and they struggle. We currently have a roster with no proven man beaters. Definitely need to find somebody until we see BA back to being himself. Hope RP can show out

idk, the film had guys open in man, but Purdy did a lot of locking onto one target. The games we played where the defense played zone, Purdy was fine.

I think it was some growing pains and we did go away from our pre snap motion.. which i think we will bring back next season

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by lamontb:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by MucketyMuck:
So does Kyle find a new Deebo or does he take the element out of the offense? I'm kind of hoping for the latter.

No more Deebo, we have CMC. Get WRs who can beat man or play well vs zone.

Deboo and JJ are good versus zone. Issue is since the SB teams.have figured our scheme just struggles versus man. Thus every good game si lnce has been versus teams playing zone. Teams play man and they struggle. We currently have a roster with no proven man beaters. Definitely need to find somebody until we see BA back to being himself. Hope RP can show out

idk, the film had guys open in man, but Purdy did a lot of locking onto one target. The games we played where the defense played zone, Purdy was fine.

I think it was some growing pains and we did go away from our pre snap motion.. which i think we will bring back next season

Well let me say it's not all on the scheme. The personnel plays a part as well. If we had a better o line that would allow more time for Brock to process things when facing tight man coverage. The bad o line and wr's not capable of beating man is just a bad recipe.

Originally posted by DrEll:

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by DrEll:
Looks like SD and others like myself were right. With Deebo gone, and whispers of a possible Aiyuk trade, this team is headed into rebuild mode. And what better way to do that than to get rid of the guy that prevented a dynasty from happening to begin with.

the transition will begin folks, and Kyle is one bender away from becoming the next head coach of the Cleveland Browns. Good riddance !

Oh you're back it was a clean place without your b******t all over this forum.

Truth hurts. Get out of your little fantasy bubble. Dynasty ova…

Try to present your personal little fantasy in a less unpleasant fashion. And by the way, there is no evidence that the team is in rebuild mode. Trading one ageing, rather injury-prone player is simply the development of the roster.

Originally posted by lamontb:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by lamontb:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by MucketyMuck:
So does Kyle find a new Deebo or does he take the element out of the offense? I'm kind of hoping for the latter.

No more Deebo, we have CMC. Get WRs who can beat man or play well vs zone.

Deboo and JJ are good versus zone. Issue is since the SB teams.have figured our scheme just struggles versus man. Thus every good game si lnce has been versus teams playing zone. Teams play man and they struggle. We currently have a roster with no proven man beaters. Definitely need to find somebody until we see BA back to being himself. Hope RP can show out

idk, the film had guys open in man, but Purdy did a lot of locking onto one target. The games we played where the defense played zone, Purdy was fine.

I think it was some growing pains and we did go away from our pre snap motion.. which i think we will bring back next season

Well let me say it's not all on the scheme. The personnel plays a part as well. If we had a better o line that would allow more time for Brock to process things when facing tight man coverage. The bad o line and wr's not capable of beating man is just a bad recipe.

revolving players due to injury is a major factor especially OL.. It had every worse scenario imagined, and it came into fruition.

This wasn't just a normal year with everyone healthy and we just sucked.

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by DrEll:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Agree.

How is the guy who lost 1 time in the Super Bowl equally as bad as the guy who lost 3 solid times in the Super Bowl?

So…now you're good finishing the season earlier than the SB?

What happened to the everyone is happy with losing stuff?

Losing in the NFCCG is now better than losing in the SB?

And stop saying Kyle lost 3 SBs. I'm going to treat that like trolling since you know very well he was an OC for the Falcons loss and the HC from that game was just polled as the top HC via Washington. Keep your energy consistent.

You're not blaming Saleh or Wilks for the SB losses. Don't blame Shanahan for the Falcons one.

I'm pretty sure Kyle DID blame Wilks for the SB loss. As many of you did. So putting the Falcons loss on his plate is fair game. If not, then let's all agree that Kyle's coaching errors was the main reason why lost to KC in 2024. Right ?

Putting a 28-3 3rd quarter collapse on the OC is idiotic.

Blaming a DC with a ton of great talent for not being able to hold a lead vs an offense that was very mediocre that season due to poor playcalling is not the same thing.

That's the issue with logic that seems to change for you guys at every moment. You talk all over yourselves.

Lol no. It is exactly the same thing. Amazing how hypocritical some of you are. You threatened to punish a poster for blaming a coordinator for a SB loss. Now you're upset when someone points the finger at Kyle instead of Wilks. Shame.

Originally posted by DrEll:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by DrEll:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Agree.

How is the guy who lost 1 time in the Super Bowl equally as bad as the guy who lost 3 solid times in the Super Bowl?

So…now you're good finishing the season earlier than the SB?

What happened to the everyone is happy with losing stuff?

Losing in the NFCCG is now better than losing in the SB?

And stop saying Kyle lost 3 SBs. I'm going to treat that like trolling since you know very well he was an OC for the Falcons loss and the HC from that game was just polled as the top HC via Washington. Keep your energy consistent.

You're not blaming Saleh or Wilks for the SB losses. Don't blame Shanahan for the Falcons one.

I'm pretty sure Kyle DID blame Wilks for the SB loss. As many of you did. So putting the Falcons loss on his plate is fair game. If not, then let's all agree that Kyle's coaching errors was the main reason why lost to KC in 2024. Right ?

Putting a 28-3 3rd quarter collapse on the OC is idiotic.

Blaming a DC with a ton of great talent for not being able to hold a lead vs an offense that was very mediocre that season due to poor playcalling is not the same thing.

That's the issue with logic that seems to change for you guys at every moment. You talk all over yourselves.

Lol no. It is exactly the same thing. Amazing how hypocritical some of you are. You threatened to punish a poster for blaming a coordinator for a SB loss. Now you're upset when someone points the finger at Kyle instead of Wilks. Shame.

All you're telling me with your post history is you're either a troll or have no actual understanding of how this game works. Shame.

And I never threatened to punish people for their opinions. There is a group of you who come in firing off posts filled with logic that can only be construed as trolling because the logic changes if it's applied to other coaches or players.

If your objective is to incite and troll the main audience of this forum and not to have real discussions then you'll be treated accordingly. As I've said in the past there are forums not 49er specific. You can have free rein to hate on this team there if you like.

if you're going to do that here make sure your login is consistent and your posts use facts so people can't mistake them for trolling.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by lamontb:

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by MucketyMuck:
So does Kyle find a new Deebo or does he take the element out of the offense? I'm kind of hoping for the latter.

No more Deebo, we have CMC. Get WRs who can beat man or play well vs zone.

Deboo and JJ are good versus zone. Issue is since the SB teams.have figured our scheme just struggles versus man. Thus every good game si lnce has been versus teams playing zone. Teams play man and they struggle. We currently have a roster with no proven man beaters. Definitely need to find somebody until we see BA back to being himself. Hope RP can show out

idk, the film had guys open in man, but Purdy did a lot of locking onto one target. The games we played where the defense played zone, Purdy was fine.

I think it was some growing pains and we did go away from our pre snap motion.. which i think we will bring back next season

JJ is good vs man he's just not fast so there are a lot of contested catches with him. Aiyuk wins with more separation. Deebo unfortunately was brutal vs man. Why I wish we had switched to running the offense through Aiyuk in the SB vs Deebo.

But big thing is getting well rounded WRs so we're not handicapped by a team going man heavy, especially with a weaker OL(hopefully we fix that too)

Originally posted by DrEll:
He needs to go. His offense is gimmicky. All pre snap movement with no real productivity. He's holding this team back along with Jimmy

A 3-year old post. He's not trolling....he just doesn't like Kyle and what he brings to the table. Dude's been pretty consistent with that and replying to him isint a requirement. I know I dont.

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by DrEll:
He needs to go. His offense is gimmicky. All pre snap movement with no real productivity. He's holding this team back along with Jimmy

A 3-year old post. He's not trolling....he just doesn't like Kyle and what he brings to the table. Dude's been pretty consistent with that and replying to him isint a requirement. I know I dont.

I appreciate your feedback but I had to clear my ignore list when taking the mod position. You don't speak for everyone here and my post applies to him and anyone else.

That 3 year old post shows either someone trolling the fans here or someone who doesn't understand this sport enough to comment on it.

No real productivity? The offense has been top 5 in yards every year in those last 3 years. In points it was 6th in 2022, 3rd in 2023 and dropped to 13th.

The worst offense under Kyle was in 2018 with Jimmy's injury in week 3 producing an offense 16th in yards and 21st in scoring.

Jim Harbaugh, a coach he considers better than Kyle, best season was 11th in both in 2012.

Like I said his logic doesn't hold up. Whether 3 years ago or yesterday.

I dont speak for everyone, but I do speak for myself and my take on things (Because some of us really do wanna keep things here even?):

Let me get this straight:

One guy fills up a thread with overly-positive talk and cheering....more than doubling everyone else's posts,...bumping legitimate posts off the page over and over, and has disappeared here since mid-season, but since it's positive, ignore it as trolling? Those of us that wanted more civil, realistic discussion simply "had to endure."

But another guy is extremely far down but since his takes are consistently the same (he doesn't like your viewpoint or Kyle), it's possibly considered trolling?



Kyle's thread is almost 3 times older than Brock's,...so by comparison, I'm not seeing or noticing the needless clutter on the right compared to the needless SPAM on the left.

Something seems a lil uneven here,...no? I've never blocked DrEll's posts either. I just ignore them and they're obviously not doing much harm (by comparison; see above).

As you said,...I dont speak for others. Only reason I come here tho is for different viewpoints instead of ones that "fall in line" with mines. Nothing's ever heinous and dude's posts can easily be skipped over. Just my $0.02.

Getting younger, dumping divas and bringing back our DC, looking a lot like a solid off season so far. Keep it rolling!

Originally posted by random49er:
I dont speak for everyone, but I do speak for myself and my take on things (Because some of us really do wanna keep things here even?):

Let me get this straight:

One guy fills up a thread with overly-positive talk and cheering....more than doubling everyone else's posts,...bumping legitimate posts off the page over and over, and has disappeared here since mid-season, but since it's positive, ignore it as trolling? Those of us that wanted more civil, realistic discussion simply "had to endure."

But another guy is extremely far down but since his takes are consistently the same (he doesn't like your viewpoint or Kyle), it's possibly considered trolling?



Kyle's thread is almost 3 times older than Brock's,...so by comparison, I'm not seeing or noticing the needless clutter on the right compared to the needless SPAM on the left.

Something seems a lil uneven here,...no? I've never blocked DrEll's posts either. I just ignore them and they're obviously not doing much harm (by comparison; see above).

As you said,...I dont speak for others. Only reason I come here tho is for different viewpoints instead of ones that "fall in line" with mines. Nothing's ever heinous and dude's posts can easily be skipped over. Just my $0.02.

The amount of times you've put in your $0.02 we'd be able to finance Brock's whole contract.

Thats a joke, you don't need to pull out a calculator to do the math on that.

I've been clear on my take on things. All the complaining from you or others I think I've only given two actual warnings to people so far and he's not even one of them.

But once again this is a 49ers forum. The majority of the posts are expected to be positive but nobody says don't post here if you have negative thoughts on the team. All fans are welcomed but when someone keeps coming in with over the top posts without facts or logic that is consistent across the board that smells like trolling.

So him posting here not as much isn't a valid point when he's been accused of not being an actual 49ers fan and comes in to get reactions from people…which is basically what trolls do.

I agree people can simply ignore it. But that's not my call or yours. All I see are posts made to stir things up vs leading to a good conversation where each side uses facts and logic to give their side of it.

My warnings have been in this threads in the hopes of achieving that. So the whole "you're not calling it even" thing is not needed. And I'd appreciate any complaints be send via PMs so we don't have to take away from the thread further. Youre welcome to contact the other mods as well if you believe I'm overstepping.

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by DrEll:
He needs to go. His offense is gimmicky. All pre snap movement with no real productivity. He's holding this team back along with Jimmy

A 3-year old post. He's not trolling....he just doesn't like Kyle and what he brings to the table. Dude's been pretty consistent with that and replying to him isint a requirement. I know I dont.

Are you really vouching for that troll lol

Originally posted by random49er:
I dont speak for everyone, but I do speak for myself and my take on things (Because some of us really do wanna keep things here even?):

Let me get this straight:

One guy fills up a thread with overly-positive talk and cheering....more than doubling everyone else's posts,...bumping legitimate posts off the page over and over, and has disappeared here since mid-season, but since it's positive, ignore it as trolling? Those of us that wanted more civil, realistic discussion simply "had to endure."

But another guy is extremely far down but since his takes are consistently the same (he doesn't like your viewpoint or Kyle), it's possibly considered trolling?



Kyle's thread is almost 3 times older than Brock's,...so by comparison, I'm not seeing or noticing the needless clutter on the right compared to the needless SPAM on the left.

Something seems a lil uneven here,...no? I've never blocked DrEll's posts either. I just ignore them and they're obviously not doing much harm (by comparison; see above).

As you said,...I dont speak for others. Only reason I come here tho is for different viewpoints instead of ones that "fall in line" with mines. Nothing's ever heinous and dude's posts can easily be skipped over. Just my $0.02.

There's a reason why he hardly posts here when things are going good and it's been awhile since then

it was a down year and look who wants to be active with no context posts and calling us losers

what more do you need to see, the sad sap is a troll

Originally posted by genus49:

Originally posted by random49er:
I dont speak for everyone, but I do speak for myself and my take on things (Because some of us really do wanna keep things here even?):

Let me get this straight:

One guy fills up a thread with overly-positive talk and cheering....more than doubling everyone else's posts,...bumping legitimate posts off the page over and over, and has disappeared here since mid-season, but since it's positive, ignore it as trolling? Those of us that wanted more civil, realistic discussion simply "had to endure."

But another guy is extremely far down but since his takes are consistently the same (he doesn't like your viewpoint or Kyle), it's possibly considered trolling?



Kyle's thread is almost 3 times older than Brock's,...so by comparison, I'm not seeing or noticing the needless clutter on the right compared to the needless SPAM on the left.

Something seems a lil uneven here,...no? I've never blocked DrEll's posts either. I just ignore them and they're obviously not doing much harm (by comparison; see above).

As you said,...I dont speak for others. Only reason I come here tho is for different viewpoints instead of ones that "fall in line" with mines. Nothing's ever heinous and dude's posts can easily be skipped over. Just my $0.02.

The amount of times you've put in your $0.02 we'd be able to finance Brock's whole contract.

Thats a joke, you don't need to pull out a calculator to do the math on that.

I've been clear on my take on things. All the complaining from you or others I think I've only given two actual warnings to people so far and he's not even one of them.

But once again this is a 49ers forum. The majority of the posts are expected to be positive but nobody says don't post here if you have negative thoughts on the team. All fans are welcomed but when someone keeps coming in with over the top posts without facts or logic that is consistent across the board that smells like trolling.

So him posting here not as much isn't a valid point when he's been accused of not being an actual 49ers fan and comes in to get reactions from people…which is basically what trolls do.

I agree people can simply ignore it. But that's not my call or yours. All I see are posts made to stir things up vs leading to a good conversation where each side uses facts and logic to give their side of it.

My warnings have been in this threads in the hopes of achieving that. So the whole "you're not calling it even" thing is not needed. And I'd appreciate any complaints be send via PMs so we don't have to take away from the thread further. Youre welcome to contact the other mods as well if you believe I'm overstepping.

There is nothing positive about a 6-11 season.