They are both light years ahead of where we are.
the shanahan machine produced the most impressive offensive team in modern day football history, IMO.
No hyperbole.
However, he had personnel that holmgren did not have to work with. So, it's tough to say.
There are 724 users in the forums
Who's Offense did you prefer when they were here? ..Shanny or Holmgrem?
- 1 2
Dec 11, 2013 at 2:55 PM
- brodiebluebanaszak
- Veteran
- Posts: 15,369
Dec 11, 2013 at 3:05 PM
- 190836
- Veteran
- Posts: 11,970
Holmgren's offense is closest thing to Bill Walsh's offense. I'd say Mike Holmgren. If you are old enough to remember his last year as our offensive coordinator, then you know what I am talking about.
Dec 11, 2013 at 4:02 PM
- LasVegasWally
- Veteran
- Posts: 24,838
Shanny
Dec 11, 2013 at 4:26 PM
- dtg_9er
- Veteran
- Posts: 33,204
Hmm...1981/84/94
OC
1) Walsh
2) Holmgren
3) Shanahan
RBs
1) Craig/Rathman
2) Watters/Floyd
3) Cooper/Patton
WRs
1) Rice/Taylor
2) Rice/Taylor
3) Clark/Solomon
OC
1) Walsh
2) Holmgren
3) Shanahan
RBs
1) Craig/Rathman
2) Watters/Floyd
3) Cooper/Patton
WRs
1) Rice/Taylor
2) Rice/Taylor
3) Clark/Solomon
Dec 11, 2013 at 8:16 PM
- Dshearn
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,409
Shanny was something else...
What I remember the most was the back field skill players went from being tools (as in utility) to weapons.
Marc Logan was a weapon at FB running the inside trap...
Then Floyd...
Watters was a walking missmatch...
What I remember the most was the back field skill players went from being tools (as in utility) to weapons.
Marc Logan was a weapon at FB running the inside trap...
Then Floyd...
Watters was a walking missmatch...
- 1 2