Originally posted by Joecool:
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by trellblaze:
Originally posted by susweel:
Originally posted by frozen49er:
We have wide receivers? Huh?
I dont think so, I know we have two pretty good TEs in VD and Boldin.
I know you're joking, but you made me wonder if perhaps Boldin can play TE. Perhaps he could learn to block?
Why?
Because we love it when our #1 receiver stays in to block DE's and LB's.
Yes, only look at it from the surface.
No...because, for one, he has the body for it. If he were a legitimate blocking threat, it would be an added tool to have a guy with WR skills matched up on a linebacker - you know, the way we scheme to get Vernon Davis matched up on linebackers. Essentially we'd have a D. Walker-esque player who has the direct opposite of Walker's ability (or inability) when it comes to pass catching.
Obviously you don't play him exclusively at TE. Just enough to give the D something to think about. It would be just as effective and frequent as moving Kilgore out wide.
A second layer of it is that, in a few years, it's likely that Boldin's play will start to decline as a WR. I'm sure he'll lose some speed. He doesn't have much speed to lose. Maybe you get a few more years of high productivity out of him if he can play TE - a position that doesn't require great speed (see Witten, Jason). Of course, this layer only matters if we intend to re-sign him long term which is doubtful.