30% off at the 49ers store with code CATCH30 →

There are 649 users in the forums

kwame harris vs chilo rachal

Shop Find 49ers gear online

kwame harris vs chilo rachal

Jan 1, 2012 at 8:10 AM
I dont agree Whomeam, Kwame was a above average run blocker that couldnt block on passing downs. Chilo cant block for the run and normally guards are good at that. For me chilo's worse only by a little bit though.
Jan 1, 2012 at 4:31 PM
Kwame's inner child was just hurting for attention and letting more DL's sack Smith than will ever be seen again in the history of mankind was the only way he knew how to get it.
Jan 1, 2012 at 4:38 PM
Kwami was bigger bust but ONLY because he was a first round pick! NOT that it matters, both are huge disappointments, Hoping Chilo develops under a full Harbaugh offseason!
Jan 1, 2012 at 4:45 PM
Why are we even discussing this.


13-3 BABY. Playoffs
Jan 1, 2012 at 5:02 PM
Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:
Why are we even discussing this.


13-3 BABY. Playoffs

Jan 1, 2012 at 5:04 PM
Harris posed the outside so it was easy for him to get exposed. Chilo plays the inside were he can be hidden a bit and looked way worse. Harris is by far a better player. I'm sure if they converted Harris to guard he would still suck but wouldn't look as bad as Chilo. Chilo has to be the worst off lineman I have ever seen in a Niner uniform.
Jan 1, 2012 at 5:06 PM
Originally posted by VaBeachNiner:
I can only think of one matchup just as great:


More like
vs
Jan 1, 2012 at 5:08 PM
Desean Jackson. Ray Rice. Matt Forte.



All players the 49ers could have had instead of Rachal.
Jan 1, 2012 at 5:53 PM
Both choices in this poll are losers.
Jan 1, 2012 at 6:38 PM
Originally posted by WildBill:
Kwame because he was a first and chilo wasn't.

What does that have to do with how crappy each guy is/was? Draft position has nothing to do with how they play on the field. Kwame sucked, Chilo still sucks. The difference is Kwame was able to run block, while Chilo can't do anything.
✕
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone