Originally posted by oldman9er:
Originally posted by dtg_9er:
Loved the way Willis talked about Bowman. You could tell he was trying to be careful and not dis TKO or anyone else but wound up saying something like it's like playing next to me. High praise is a little embarrassing...awkward.
Wow.. might have missed that article.. or just plain going insane... nice.
I have been quiet about this, but there have been many times in games this year where I have been asking myself... where the hell is Willis? He's been quiet, and I know that's part of the role he's now asked to play. But I'd sure like to see him making an impact pick or sack soon.
Do you guys think he's regressing or anything?
Glad you brought this up old! In the preseason, I warned fans that Willis' number will decrease dramatically in the tackling category now that we have a more balanced attack and the scheme is different. In short, Manusky is no longer here and the goal is not to keep Willis 100% free to rack up hall-of-fame numbers; its more balanced. Now we are seeing everyone on the front 7 plus Aldon Smith and backup defensive linemen playing outstanding and playing as a "team." All that said, Willis should be more free to make big plays and be the playmaker we all know he can be. But so far this year, he is in coverage much more and that is his big weakness. He's always around the receiver but rarely knocks down a pass or gets an INT. In addition, when he is used to blitz, he's not 1/2 as successful as Bowman who's much more natural. Right now, he's just getting tackles and appears human again but as a defense, we are much better in the front 7...as a team. I don't see this changing anytime soon.
On a side note: We have the potential to see many more big plays if we simply make one simple scheme change. I rewatched the Eagles game and Brooks, McDonald, CB's and Bowman were in the backfield ALL game long and produced constant pressure well under 3 seconds. The schematic issue was that while the pressure was clearly getting there, Vick was getting beat the #$%^& up, he only had time to hit the hot route and the hot route was open ALL day long for big gains b/c we were playing so far off everyone (not just the WR's)...I'm assuming we played off b/c we were respecting their speed but we needed to play our game and be physical and knock these guys off their routes and keep their eyes in the backfield. That one change, I kid you not, could have lead to close to a dozen INT's. OK I'm joking a bit but I'm telling you, Vick only had one option and had he looked up and saw blanket coverage on his hot read, it was going to be an INT or a sack, fumble. Also, we should never rush just three men again...ever. Haha. Loved all of the CB/S blitzes though...we ran a ton of them against Vick. God, that play where McDonald sacked the handoff and Brooks stayed with the play and made the huge TFL on the RB? That was one of the best plays I have EVER seen...the hits by Smith and Goldson x2 were beautiful as well as the hustle play by Justin. I was so proud of this group and wish they could have been rewarded more with this minor scheme change. Hopefully, we'll do that again like we did against the Bengals esp. when Spencer comes back. He's money at this and amazing against the run and on CB blitzes. Come on Fangio!!
I would love to see how many QB hurries/pressures, hits we had on Vick. He was BEAT UP after this game and gave us props in the media.
[ Edited by NCommand on Oct 5, 2011 at 8:17 AM ]



