Should we have kept Martz??

Baldie · 2010-09-19T21:10:55-07:00

With all the weapons we have on offense, makes me wonder if we should have kept Martz. Look at what he's done in Chicago. Kudos to them beating the Cowboys today. With the weapons we have on offense, thats the type of system we need to be running. We should have kept Martz......I for one hated the decision to let him go. Love Sing.....but hated his decision to fire Martz. His system gaurantees points. Raye's is hit and miss. Just being smash mouth just isn't enough nowadays. On paper we have a great OLine....but I don't think it will be to its potential this season, the season which everyone is expecting the niners to get into the playoffs. I really hope I'm wrong though.........BEAT THE SAINTS!! [ Edited by Baldie on Sep 19, 2010 at 21:14:52 ]

Sep 19, 2010 at 9:14 PM

AXEGRINDER
Veteran
Posts: 25,680

Cutler is lucky he survived the 1st quarter.

Sep 19, 2010 at 9:15 PM

Baldie
Veteran
Posts: 25,466

Originally posted by AXEGRINDER:
Cutler is lucky he survived the 1st quarter.

Yeah your right, but when they made some adjusements, they got it going.

Sep 19, 2010 at 9:17 PM

A-R-S
Veteran
Posts: 8,219

We should have NOT let Sing scare off Linehan.

But yes, Martz>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Jimmy Raye.

Sep 19, 2010 at 9:17 PM

WillistheWall
Veteran
Posts: 22,848

Originally posted by A-R-S:
We should have NOT let Sing scare off Linehan.

But yes, Martz>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Jimmy Raye.

Sep 19, 2010 at 9:18 PM

9erfreak
Veteran
Posts: 1,020

No!

Martz doesn't utilize TE's well, and a Martz run offense usually results in league leading in sacks allowed.

Sep 19, 2010 at 9:20 PM

Kingpin
Veteran
Posts: 10,485

With Martz Davis' receiving talents would have never never been realized.

So no.

Sep 19, 2010 at 9:20 PM

LeadFarmer
Veteran
Posts: 822

Originally posted by 9erfreak:
No!

Martz doesn't utilize TE's well, and a Martz run offense usually results in league leading in sacks allowed.

Did you hear when they said Martz said hes never had a TE as fast as olson

Sep 19, 2010 at 9:21 PM

SoCal9er
Veteran
Posts: 11,496

Originally posted by A-R-S:
We should have NOT let Sing scare off Linehan.

But yes, Martz>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Jimmy Raye.

Cutler >>>>> you know who, too.

Sep 19, 2010 at 9:21 PM

AB81Rules
Hall of Fame
Posts: 34,071

hell no, Alex would be on the sideline so quick.

And yeah, that is ludicrious about Olsen being so fast even faster than Vernon. VD is truly a beast of an athlete and is finally showing it.

Sep 19, 2010 at 9:23 PM

#10

tjd808185
Veteran
Posts: 26,075

No

Chicago is much better fit for him. Fast receivers, big armed quarterback. We just didn't have that here and while he did an okay job he just didn't fit in.

Sep 19, 2010 at 9:26 PM

#11

Negrodamus
Veteran
Posts: 13,782

the mods need to start handing out stiff penalties to numb-nuts for starting retarded threads without using any common sense or judgment to how this is necessary.

Sep 19, 2010 at 9:26 PM

#12

49ersalldaway126
Veteran
Posts: 14,549

Originally posted by tjd808185:
No

Chicago is much better fit for him. Fast receivers, big armed quarterback. We just didn't have that here and while he did an okay job he just didn't fit in.

i think alex wouldve done better under martz system than shaun hill was i was in favor of keeping marz then and if its him or raye i would choose martz

Sep 19, 2010 at 9:27 PM

#13

PrimeTime
Veteran
Posts: 240

Originally posted by LeadFarmer:
Originally posted by 9erfreak:
No!

Martz doesn't utilize TE's well, and a Martz run offense usually results in league leading in sacks allowed.

Did you hear when they said Martz said hes never had a TE as fast as olson

Martz also said that Alex was "One of the best quarterbacks he had ever coached" in 2008 before Smith's injury.

Sep 19, 2010 at 9:27 PM

#14

Allx9er
Veteran
Posts: 11,690