Originally posted by DesiDez:
Roger is a really intriguing candidate for the HOF. The homer in me says yes, but he might just be a very very good RB.
Any time the question of whether a player is a HOF, I just myself one question: During his era and when compared to his fellow RBs of the same era, was he considered a top 3 RB during his playing career?
Other RBs of his era:
Payton (past his prime though)
Marcus Allen
Eric Dickerson
Tony Dorsett
John Riggins
And all the guys above are HOFs.
Plus during the 80s, RBs were not really receiving threats, but that could play into Craig's favor because one could argue that he was the 1st RB to make running backs a dual threat as evidenced by being the 1st RB to have 1000 yards rushing and receiving.
I personally think his receiving abilities more than make up for his lack of rushing yards. He was a complete football player.
Here's a good article about Craig: Link
Roger Craig is a lot like Dale Murphy of the Alt. Braves. He's also up for the Baseball Hall of Fame every year and just doesn't make it. Has good numbers and was one of the best during his day.


Everyone always talks about Marshall Faulk bein the best duel back, but Craig was the prototype for all these dual backs we see now.