[ Edited by fan49 on Aug 29, 2009 at 10:30 PM ]
There are 214 users in the forums
Should Hill Really be our starter?
Should Hill Really be our starter?
Aug 29, 2009 at 10:30 PM
- fan49
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,249
He hasn't shown any inkling of being a starter all pre-season. This is not a thread about alex or davis being the starter. Simply' its about Hill not showing any sign of being an nfl starter. Last year he did go 7-3. I almost promise none of those teams were in the top 15 d. So share opinion if you like, but should shaun hill be our starter or are you nervous?
Aug 29, 2009 at 10:31 PM
- Afrikan
- Veteran
- Posts: 21,470
Originally posted by fan49:
He hasn't shown any inkling of being a starter all pre-season. This is not a thread about alex or davis being the starter. Simply' its about Hill not showing any sign of being an nfl starter. Last year he did go 7-3. I almost promise none of those teams were in the top 15 d. So share opinion if you like, but should shaun hill be our starter or are you nervous?
what rank was the Redskin's defense last year?
Aug 29, 2009 at 10:32 PM
- fan49
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,249
Originally posted by Afrikan:Originally posted by fan49:
He hasn't shown any inkling of being a starter all pre-season. This is not a thread about alex or davis being the starter. Simply' its about Hill not showing any sign of being an nfl starter. Last year he did go 7-3. I almost promise none of those teams were in the top 15 d. So share opinion if you like, but should shaun hill be our starter or are you nervous?
what rank was the Redskin's defense last year?
24
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=2&defensiveStatisticCategory=GAME_STATS&conference=ALL&role=OPP&season=2009&seasonType=PRE&d-447263-s=TOTAL_YARDS_GAME_AVG&d-447263-o=1&d-447263-n=1
[ Edited by fan49 on Aug 29, 2009 at 10:33 PM ]
Aug 29, 2009 at 10:34 PM
- MikeyVnutz
- Info N/A
gives us the best chance to win right now so yes he should be the starter... that being said he did not look good in the game tonight but nate davis is the s**t!!!
Aug 29, 2009 at 10:35 PM
- fan49
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,249
Originally posted by MikeyVnutz:
gives us the best chance to win right now so yes he should be the starter... that being said he did not look good in the game tonight but nate davis is the s**t!!!
he hasn't looked good at all this pre-season
Aug 29, 2009 at 10:35 PM
- global_nomad
- Veteran
- Posts: 14,827
Yes, he won the QB competition.
N. Davis would not look so good if he played against Dallas' 1st team. I like what I see from him against guys who are getting cut tomorrow but he needs time to develop.
N. Davis would not look so good if he played against Dallas' 1st team. I like what I see from him against guys who are getting cut tomorrow but he needs time to develop.
Aug 29, 2009 at 10:39 PM
- Apone
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,739
Absolutely he gives us the best shot to go the super bowl.
Aug 29, 2009 at 10:43 PM
- Mex49
- Member
- Posts: 2,979
Check out the double pump at 1.57 left in the 1st qtr
Aug 29, 2009 at 10:44 PM
- fan49
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,249
Originally posted by global_nomad:
Yes, he won the QB competition.
N. Davis would not look so good if he played against Dallas' 1st team. I like what I see from him against guys who are getting cut tomorrow but he needs time to develop.
he made perfect throws, and he was way too calm acorrding to sing. hitting the number is hitting the numbers. (which hill hasn't done all preseason) and i think he runs better than hill too. but once again i said this thread is not about ales or davis its about hill.
Aug 29, 2009 at 10:45 PM
- fan49
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,249
Originally posted by global_nomad:
Yes, he won the QB competition.
N. Davis would not look so good if he played against Dallas' 1st team. I like what I see from him against guys who are getting cut tomorrow but he needs time to develop.
and hill completely out performed everyone so far in pre season right? no way
[ Edited by fan49 on Aug 29, 2009 at 10:45 PM ]
Aug 29, 2009 at 10:45 PM
- MikeyVnutz
- Info N/A
Originally posted by global_nomad:
Yes, he won the QB competition.
N. Davis would not look so good if he played against Dallas' 1st team. I like what I see from him against guys who are getting cut tomorrow but he needs time to develop.
i think its obvious that he wouldn't look as good against a first team defense and he definitely needs time to develop but wow.. what potential this guy has.. i really like what i see with him
Aug 29, 2009 at 10:47 PM
- Afrikan
- Veteran
- Posts: 21,470
Originally posted by fan49:Originally posted by Afrikan:Originally posted by fan49:
He hasn't shown any inkling of being a starter all pre-season. This is not a thread about alex or davis being the starter. Simply' its about Hill not showing any sign of being an nfl starter. Last year he did go 7-3. I almost promise none of those teams were in the top 15 d. So share opinion if you like, but should shaun hill be our starter or are you nervous?
what rank was the Redskin's defense last year?
24
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=2&defensiveStatisticCategory=GAME_STATS&conference=ALL&role=OPP&season=2009&seasonType=PRE&d-447263-s=TOTAL_YARDS_GAME_AVG&d-447263-o=1&d-447263-n=1
ummmm....it is telling me they were ranked #4 in all the NFL.
also the Bills, Dolphins, Jets were ranked 14,15,16.
and I'm sure their ranks wouldn't have been better if they didn't have to play the Patriots 2 times that year.
Aug 29, 2009 at 10:47 PM
- toeknee
- Veteran
- Posts: 54,571
he's going to have to play a lot better against arizona, if he plays as bad as he has then i say pull him
Aug 29, 2009 at 10:49 PM
- fan49
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,249
Originally posted by Afrikan:Originally posted by fan49:Originally posted by Afrikan:Originally posted by fan49:
He hasn't shown any inkling of being a starter all pre-season. This is not a thread about alex or davis being the starter. Simply' its about Hill not showing any sign of being an nfl starter. Last year he did go 7-3. I almost promise none of those teams were in the top 15 d. So share opinion if you like, but should shaun hill be our starter or are you nervous?
what rank was the Redskin's defense last year?
24
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=2&defensiveStatisticCategory=GAME_STATS&conference=ALL&role=OPP&season=2009&seasonType=PRE&d-447263-s=TOTAL_YARDS_GAME_AVG&d-447263-o=1&d-447263-n=1
ummmm....it is telling me they were ranked #4 in all the NFL.
also the Bills, Dolphins, Jets were ranked 14,15,16.
and I'm sure their ranks wouldn't have been better if they didn't have to play the Patriots 2 times that year.
really i still see them at the bottom?
what are you looking at herse a cut and paste
24 Washington Redskins 3 21 63 191 338.3 5.3 17.3 17 45 38 1 3 33 29 241 29:05 6 2
Aug 29, 2009 at 10:51 PM
- fan49
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,249
14 Pittsburgh Steelers 2 13.5 27 141 316.5 4.5 21.0 15 32 47 2 3 67 11 79 32:22 2 0
[b]15 Chicago Bears 2 15 30 138 317.0 4.6 17.0 14 35 40 2 4 50 14 113 33:21 4 2
16 Kansas City Chiefs 2 16.5 33 114 320.0 5.6 16.0 6 24 25 1 2 50 25 172 28:17 4 0[/b]14 Pittsburgh Steelers 2 13.5 27 141 316.5 4.5 21.0 15 32 47 2 3 67 11 79 32:22 2 0
15 Chicago Bears 2 15 30 138 317.0 4.6 17.0 14 35 40 2 4 50 14 113 33:21 4 2
16 Kansas City Chiefs 2 16.5 33 114 320.0 5.6 16.0 6 24 25 1 2 50 25 172 28:17 4 0
dont know what your looking at
[b]15 Chicago Bears 2 15 30 138 317.0 4.6 17.0 14 35 40 2 4 50 14 113 33:21 4 2
16 Kansas City Chiefs 2 16.5 33 114 320.0 5.6 16.0 6 24 25 1 2 50 25 172 28:17 4 0[/b]14 Pittsburgh Steelers 2 13.5 27 141 316.5 4.5 21.0 15 32 47 2 3 67 11 79 32:22 2 0
15 Chicago Bears 2 15 30 138 317.0 4.6 17.0 14 35 40 2 4 50 14 113 33:21 4 2
16 Kansas City Chiefs 2 16.5 33 114 320.0 5.6 16.0 6 24 25 1 2 50 25 172 28:17 4 0
dont know what your looking at