Originally posted by AKfanster:
OK Reasonable,
First, it's Olshansky...... NOT "olansky"
And if you think Balmer will play anywhere near his level this season, you are a bigger idiot than I thought. Balmer played how many snaps last season on D? Not very many, but yet, you claim he held up blockers and got good penetration! Ya, I guess he did.........on special teams. The guy on our team who DID play close to Igor's level was Soap, but nobody really noticed. I guess it's easy to look down on anybody who is replacing a NINER star (BY).
I don't understand why people are so high on this guy. He was a 1 year wonder in college that really never did much before his last season. The biggest knock on him was that he plays too high at the point of impact.
What little I saw of him last season I wasn't impressed. However, I didn' think the kid was garbage either. He needs alot of work, but he could turn out to be an avg to good player. I was pleased when I heard he has been working out with Justin Smith. He has good size for a 3-4 end and if he develops a good work ethic he will do well. With that said, Balmer isn't even close to Olshansky, Canty, Warren, or Keisel (underrated IMO).
You started off by calling everyone else on the board idiots. Way to make yourself a target.
First off I can see you do not even bother to read. Let me breakdown everything wrong with your post.
#1. I did NOT call EVERYONE idiots. The ones whom I did use that language toward are the ones who think players in the mold of a guy like Freeney are the answers to this teams need at defensive end. Which they have absolutely NO IDEA that a guy like Freeney would never play DE in a 3-4...but since they just would look at positions and not players they wouldnt know the difference.
#2. I didnt even spell or misspell Olshansky's name, I simply quoted another poster who happened to spell his name wrong. BIG FREAKIN DEAL if he spelled it wrong...I referred to him as Igor.
#3. I did not say he would match the player Olshansky is this season...I said that Olshansky was the player that came to mind when I thought about Balmer's potential. POTENTIAL!! Which would be a fair comparison considering they are similar in size, strength and that they BOTH played DT in college and were converted to DE in the NFL.
#4. I distinctly pointed out that Balmer did not get much playing time at the beginning of the season and that in his limited work toward the end of last season he did very well in learning the details of his responsibility at DE i.e. occupying blockers, stopping his running lanes and getting decent penetration...all of which he did a DECENT job at in his VERY LIMITED TIME. If you happened to read(which obviously you didnt) I also pointed out at how his learning curve was steeper not just because of his position change but the fact that he was a ROOKIE defensive lineman.
#5. Who in the hell would think Balmer would automatically replace BY?? Balmer and BY are 2 different types of defensive lineman. BY was the type who could play anywhere alone the line because of his rare combo of size and speed along with excellent technique. Balmer is more of a mauler who occupies blockers and stuffs the run while getting mild penetration to the QB.
#6. Like I said in the previous post...if you are going to quote me...KNOW WHAT THE HELL YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.
Now for everyone else who was offended by my "idiot" referral. They seemed to understand whom I was referring to and accepted the apology I offered. YOU seem to be EXACTLY who I was referring to when I used that word.
You read nothing yet have an opinion on everything I have said.
GET IT RIGHT before you quote me...