Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:
Yeah he's right.
There are 112 users in the forums
Originally posted by Sanfran_chrisco:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by picklejuice:
I might watch some Las Vegas games now. I want to see the difference between McDaniels and Kyle's offense.
This is all I want to see. Does he play better in the spread or was Kyle's offense really what was best for him in the end. Or did it even matter? LOL
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by picklejuice:
I might watch some Las Vegas games now. I want to see the difference between McDaniels and Kyle's offense.
This is all I want to see. Does he play better in the spread or was Kyle's offense really what was best for him in the end. Or did it even matter? LOL
Define "play better".
There's no doubt in my mind that Jimmy will have success throwing to Devante Adams, arguably the best WR in football. Jimmy's a good QB who's played for McDaniels.
I ask the question what's "play better" mean because for years people have used wins-losses to prove Jimmy's value.
What happens if Jimmy G's stats improve but the Raiders go 6-10?
It will interesting to watch those same posters who used to value winning, now value individual performance over winning… now that he's losing (hypothetically).
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:ratings ..percentages.. they don't hold value if you don't throw enough
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by picklejuice:
I might watch some Las Vegas games now. I want to see the difference between McDaniels and Kyle's offense.
This is all I want to see. Does he play better in the spread or was Kyle's offense really what was best for him in the end. Or did it even matter? LOL
Define "play better".
There's no doubt in my mind that Jimmy will have success throwing to Devante Adams, arguably the best WR in football. Jimmy's a good QB who's played for McDaniels.
I ask the question what's "play better" mean because for years people have used wins-losses to prove Jimmy's value.
What happens if Jimmy G's stats improve but the Raiders go 6-10?
It will interesting to watch those same posters who used to value winning, now value individual performance over winning… now that he's losing (hypothetically).
Wins / losses is what you see when you look through the microscope and focus on it
I routinely mentioned the record, but I also routinely mentioned the rating. Both are top 10 all time at QB. Why do you say ppl used the record? Why don't you say ppl used his rating?
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by picklejuice:
I might watch some Las Vegas games now. I want to see the difference between McDaniels and Kyle's offense.
This is all I want to see. Does he play better in the spread or was Kyle's offense really what was best for him in the end. Or did it even matter? LOL
Define "play better".
There's no doubt in my mind that Jimmy will have success throwing to Devante Adams, arguably the best WR in football. Jimmy's a good QB who's played for McDaniels.
I ask the question what's "play better" mean because for years people have used wins-losses to prove Jimmy's value.
What happens if Jimmy G's stats improve but the Raiders go 6-10?
It will interesting to watch those same posters who used to value winning, now value individual performance over winning… now that he's losing (hypothetically).
Wins / losses is what you see when you look through the microscope and focus on it
I routinely mentioned the record, but I also routinely mentioned the rating. Both are top 10 all time at QB. Why do you say ppl used the record? Why don't you say ppl used his rating?
Originally posted by Waterbear:
To the bolded… because they did. Are you saying they didn't?
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
To the bolded… because they did. Are you saying they didn't?
It's not all they used tho as you claim
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Wins / losses is what you see when you look through the microscope and focus on it
I routinely mentioned the record, but I also routinely mentioned the rating. Both are top 10 all time at QB. Why do you say ppl used the record? Why don't you say ppl used his rating?
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
To the bolded… because they did. Are you saying they didn't?
It's not all they used tho as you claim
I agree. Lets use his playoff stats to evaluate.
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Mike Trout?
Thats all you got?
It must get tiring.
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by picklejuice:
I might watch some Las Vegas games now. I want to see the difference between McDaniels and Kyle's offense.
This is all I want to see. Does he play better in the spread or was Kyle's offense really what was best for him in the end. Or did it even matter? LOL
Define "play better".
There's no doubt in my mind that Jimmy will have success throwing to Devante Adams, arguably the best WR in football. Jimmy's a good QB who's played for McDaniels.
I ask the question what's "play better" mean because for years people have used wins-losses to prove Jimmy's value.
What happens if Jimmy G's stats improve but the Raiders go 6-10?
It will interesting to watch those same posters who used to value winning, now value individual performance over winning… now that he's losing (hypothetically).