There are 143 users in the forums
Should we acquire Matt Stafford for 2016?
Nov 7, 2015 at 9:23 AM
- Willisfn4life
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,054
I would be very meh on that move. It would be entertaining to see what he could do with a consistent running game behind him though. That of course barring he could get consistent oline play here...
Nov 7, 2015 at 10:57 AM
- iceberg450r
- Veteran
- Posts: 342
Originally posted by qnnhan7:
Kaep's read ability level with a zippy arm, but no mobility. No thanks.
How about if our option is Stafford or Gabbert?
Nov 7, 2015 at 11:23 AM
- LVJay
- Veteran
- Posts: 27,847
I hope we acquire Stafford... Banjo Man is kind of old now.
He can play a double role and be the mascot, too. The staff likes guys that can do more than one thing there in the Santa Clara swamp...
He can play a double role and be the mascot, too. The staff likes guys that can do more than one thing there in the Santa Clara swamp...
Nov 7, 2015 at 12:27 PM
- trooper49
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,568
We could do a lot worse. I've always liked Stafford. Certainly him over Bradford. Stafford on a different team, he could be very good. Remember, he plays for the Detroit Lions, the team God has deemed will never be successful.
Nov 7, 2015 at 1:01 PM
- VinculumJuris
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,079
Originally posted by iceberg450r:
Originally posted by qnnhan7:
Kaep's read ability level with a zippy arm, but no mobility. No thanks.
How about if our option is Stafford or Gabbert?
At what cap figure? We have a lot of positions that need to be restocked, and a huge contract for a so-so QB like Stafford really hurts us there.
Nov 7, 2015 at 1:02 PM
- LasVegasWally
- Veteran
- Posts: 24,265
Originally posted by Antix:
Nah..not really. We should upgrade the position..not just keep the same problem with less mobility.
Dude has CJ and sucks..he'd die here.
This.
Nov 7, 2015 at 3:20 PM
- LVJay
- Veteran
- Posts: 27,847
An "acquired" taste to say the least 
Nov 7, 2015 at 3:58 PM
- Blindfury
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,663
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Right it's ridiculous that people actually think Stafford is gonna stroll into SF as a bridge QB looking for $10 million a year and no long term guarantees.
And like you said Detroit isn't gonna drop him without getting something in return along with zero behind him...thread over
What's funny is people think he will be much of an improvement over the guy sitting on the bench.
Nov 8, 2015 at 5:20 AM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 107,980
Originally posted by Blindfury:Originally posted by NYniner85:Right it's ridiculous that people actually think Stafford is gonna stroll into SF as a bridge QB looking for $10 million a year and no long term guarantees.
And like you said Detroit isn't gonna drop him without getting something in return along with zero behind him...thread over
What's funny is people think he will be much of an improvement over the guy sitting on the bench.
Yeah thats debatable but I don't think there's a huge difference...regardless with this coaching staff and OL no one is gonna look good, with Blaine behind center we won't win another game this season and have a top 5 pick which I'm fine with.
Nov 8, 2015 at 11:42 AM
- strickac
- Veteran
- Posts: 15,175
Originally posted by LasVegasWally:Originally posted by Antix:Nah..not really. We should upgrade the position..not just keep the same problem with less mobility.
Dude has CJ and sucks..he'd die here.
This.
Calvin is nowhere near the player he used to be. He's breaking down.
Nov 8, 2015 at 11:45 AM
- strickac
- Veteran
- Posts: 15,175
Originally posted by Blindfury:What's funny is people think he will be much of an improvement over the guy sitting on the bench.
Blaine has never proven he can play. Stafford is expected to put up 4000+ yds annually. There's a big difference in their bodies of work. Unless Gabbert is reborn this week and starts playing well, theres no comparison with him and Stafford.
Nov 8, 2015 at 3:13 PM
- iceberg450r
- Veteran
- Posts: 342
Originally posted by iceberg450r:
Originally posted by qnnhan7:
Kaep's read ability level with a zippy arm, but no mobility. No thanks.
How about if our option is Stafford or Gabbert?
we are project at $44M under the cap next year that doesn't even account Kaep being cut.
Nov 8, 2015 at 4:28 PM
- strickac
- Veteran
- Posts: 15,175
Strike this thread. We may have a discount QB on our hands. Let BG start next year and see if he's worthy of a big contract. Either way, draft a QB and groom him.
Nov 9, 2015 at 3:05 PM
- BuZzB05
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,605
Noo noo. We must not accepted for Stafford because he is suck and his bad leader his team. I am not interested in him!
Nov 10, 2015 at 12:55 PM
- 24plus25er
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,180
Originally posted by strickac:
Originally posted by Blindfury:
What's funny is people think he will be much of an improvement over the guy sitting on the bench.
Blaine has never proven he can play. Stafford is expected to put up 4000+ yds annually. There's a big difference in their bodies of work. Unless Gabbert is reborn this week and starts playing well, theres no comparison with him and Stafford.
Stafford puts up 4,000 because he has Megatron and they are always trailing or flat our getting baked in games. It does not mean he is a QB. Blake Bortles, Josh McCown and several other garbage QBs do the same exact thing. Putting up yards in garbage time.