We have seen the Patriots play without Brady, and we have now seen the Colts play without Manning...
So which QB is truly more valuable to their team?
There are 150 users in the forums
Which QB is "truly" more valuable to his team?
- 1 2
Which QB is "truly" more valuable to his team?
Sep 24, 2011 at 12:35 PM
- 49erFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 534
Sep 24, 2011 at 12:38 PM
- YungAce
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,915
Cassel actually won over 9 games right? I'm not sure if the Colts will win any..
Sep 24, 2011 at 12:43 PM
- gold49er2183
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,437
Originally posted by YungAce:
Cassel actually won over 9 games right? I'm not sure if the Colts will win any..
they went 11-5 with him but missed the playoffs.
Sep 24, 2011 at 12:47 PM
- susweel
- Hall of Nepal
- Posts: 120,278
Manning because you see what happens without him. Pats still won ten games without Brady.
Sep 24, 2011 at 12:55 PM
- cwilson830
- Staff
- Posts: 5,499
Originally posted by 49erFan:We have seen the Patriots play without Brady, and we have now seen the Colts play without Manning...
So which QB is truly more valuable to their team?
You answered your own question.
Sep 24, 2011 at 6:01 PM
- GEEK
- Veteran
- Posts: 19,196
Definitely Manning - but I don't think that is the right question to ask.
Why haven't the Colts been more aggressive at finding an upgrade to their backup QB position in the past 6-odd years? The Patriots are similar to the Eagles in that they have been able to find substitutes for Brady and still play at a somewhat high/decent level - Cassel being the main one. Now they have Ryan Mallett, who I think is the perfect fit as that developmental QB.
Now the Colts have done what exactly? Jim Sorgi for over a half decade, drafted Painter in the 6th round, and signed a vet QB that will be 39 years old in December.
Piss poor front office work for not locking up a capable backup. Hell, they could have gotten Shaun Hill for a late round pick.
Why haven't the Colts been more aggressive at finding an upgrade to their backup QB position in the past 6-odd years? The Patriots are similar to the Eagles in that they have been able to find substitutes for Brady and still play at a somewhat high/decent level - Cassel being the main one. Now they have Ryan Mallett, who I think is the perfect fit as that developmental QB.
Now the Colts have done what exactly? Jim Sorgi for over a half decade, drafted Painter in the 6th round, and signed a vet QB that will be 39 years old in December.
Piss poor front office work for not locking up a capable backup. Hell, they could have gotten Shaun Hill for a late round pick.
Sep 24, 2011 at 6:20 PM
- aTx49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,662
This question is really not a fair comparison because the patriots as a whole were alot better team when they lost brady than the colts are now.
Sep 24, 2011 at 6:25 PM
- cwilson830
- Staff
- Posts: 5,499
Originally posted by GEEK:Definitely Manning - but I don't think that is the right question to ask.
Why haven't the Colts been more aggressive at finding an upgrade to their backup QB position in the past 6-odd years? The Patriots are similar to the Eagles in that they have been able to find substitutes for Brady and still play at a somewhat high/decent level - Cassel being the main one. Now they have Ryan Mallett, who I think is the perfect fit as that developmental QB.
Now the Colts have done what exactly? Jim Sorgi for over a half decade, drafted Painter in the 6th round, and signed a vet QB that will be 39 years old in December.
Piss poor front office work for not locking up a capable backup. Hell, they could have gotten Shaun Hill for a late round pick.
Sep 24, 2011 at 7:06 PM
- unst4bl3
- Member
- Posts: 7,568
ALex Smith.
Sep 27, 2011 at 8:12 PM
- 49erfeeeever808
- Veteran
- Posts: 31,326
Matt Cassel is a tad better than Kerry Collins..... a tad.
Sep 27, 2011 at 8:31 PM
- ninermaniac
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,038
Watch them get Luck :(, talk about sucking at the best time.
Sep 27, 2011 at 8:43 PM
- StOnEy333
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 99,663
Originally posted by ninermaniac:
Watch them get Luck :(, talk about sucking at the best time.
I think they might trade that pick if they got it. It might be our best chance to get him.
Sep 27, 2011 at 8:44 PM
- jreff22
- Veteran
- Posts: 65,576
Manning, the system doesn't work without him
Sep 30, 2011 at 1:24 PM
- zillabeast
- Veteran
- Posts: 20,042
How about Stafford. Or even Fitzpatrick. They are insane so far.
Sep 30, 2011 at 1:39 PM
- unst4bl3
- Member
- Posts: 7,568
Originally posted by zillabeast:
How about Stafford. Or even Fitzpatrick. They are insane so far.
Fitzpatrick for sure, without stafford if hill was in there, the lions would still be ok.
- 1 2