Originally posted by tjd808185:
The one I got to disagree with you on is you can't account for what's later. What if Baker is off the board? What if Corey Davis falls? You really don't know what you're going to get in the 2nd round. You can look at overall depth but that's not a guarantee. I've seen 8 deep wr classes with only Fitzgerald delivering. You got to take it one pick at a time and while I'm not on Hooker's bandwagon I still don't see 3 tech as a need.
Once again, we disagree on Thomas being just a 3 tech. Heck even if he was just one fit...who do we have there? Armstead? Ward has shown way more in his NFL career than Armstead has but why are we considering FS a need while assuming we're good at 3T?
I do agree with your main point which is you can't account who can be had later but it's partly why I value Thomas over Hooker, I think Ward allows us to not even touch safety in this draft. If Baker is there and we think he's BPA then you take him and let them fight it out. If not then we have Ward show what he can do.
I thought Redmond played will in preseason did you not? I have no idea why they didn't play them but I also have no idea why JoN was even a DC in the NFL to begin with...you've said yourself that Ward is a mediocre CB, so why not let him play his more natural position? They brought in Williams to play slot as well. CB is gonna be drafted regardless if Ward is a S or CB and Lynch already said they're moving him to FS
the bears have demps who played well (12th overall) but they didn't have anything close to lockdown at CB. 23rd overall isn't bad at all considering how many CBs play in the league. There were a TON of big name CBs that ranked lower than he did.
the bears have demps who played well (12th overall) but they didn't have anything close to lockdown at CB. 23rd overall isn't bad at all considering how many CBs play in the league. There were a TON of big name CBs that ranked lower than he did.