There are 387 users in the forums
Ivanm05's 3 Weeks out Mock
Browse 49ers books and videos
Apr 8, 2016 at 9:34 PM
- tatdwolf49
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,206
Hhmmm Lawson maybe on a trade back IMO ...Just wonderin how u see tha first 6 picks goin and if Buckner is off tha board??? Lawson over Buckner ???
Apr 8, 2016 at 10:22 PM
- ivanm05
- Veteran
- Posts: 665
Originally posted by tatdwolf49:Hhmmm Lawson maybe on a trade back IMO ...Just wonderin how u see tha first 6 picks goin and if Buckner is off tha board??? Lawson over Buckner ???
Yeah, yeah this is with Buckner off the board. This is with Tunsil, Wentz, Ramsey, Bosa, Jack, Buckner off the board. In that order.
Apr 8, 2016 at 10:36 PM
- eastcoast49ersfan
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,112
Originally posted by ivanm05:
Originally posted by tatdwolf49:
Hhmmm Lawson maybe on a trade back IMO ...Just wonderin how u see tha first 6 picks goin and if Buckner is off tha board??? Lawson over Buckner ???
Yeah, yeah this is with Buckner off the board. This is with Tunsil, Wentz, Ramsey, Bosa, Jack, Buckner off the board. In that order.
But not Goff? Goff is still on the board and we pick Lawson...
Apr 8, 2016 at 10:45 PM
- tatdwolf49
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,206
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:Originally posted by ivanm05:Originally posted by tatdwolf49:Hhmmm Lawson maybe on a trade back IMO ...Just wonderin how u see tha first 6 picks goin and if Buckner is off tha board??? Lawson over Buckner ???
Yeah, yeah this is with Buckner off the board. This is with Tunsil, Wentz, Ramsey, Bosa, Jack, Buckner off the board. In that order.
But not Goff? Goff is still on the board and we pick Lawson...
NO GOFF
Apr 8, 2016 at 10:45 PM
- ivanm05
- Veteran
- Posts: 665
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:But not Goff? Goff is still on the board and we pick Lawson...
This is on the basis that we keep Kap. I think it would just be a circus/controversy if we take a qb that high with Kap still on the roster. I suppose you could always trade him afterwards.. but at that point you have no leverage and will probably be giving him away.
If we trade Kap then I'm all for grabbing a QB in the first round. Of course granted Goff or Wentz is available.
I think that if Kap and Chip hit it off and he stays then Trent will go defense w the 1st pick.
And it's not such a bad idea. The Kap Kelly could prove to be a good marriage..you could always take a qb later or next year.. let's not act like Goff is the hottest qb prospect in recent years either. What if we have the chance at a Watson next season?
[ Edited by ivanm05 on Apr 8, 2016 at 10:47 PM ]
Apr 8, 2016 at 11:02 PM
- irishluder
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,356
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:
Originally posted by ivanm05:
Originally posted by tatdwolf49:
Hhmmm Lawson maybe on a trade back IMO ...Just wonderin how u see tha first 6 picks goin and if Buckner is off tha board??? Lawson over Buckner ???
Yeah, yeah this is with Buckner off the board. This is with Tunsil, Wentz, Ramsey, Bosa, Jack, Buckner off the board. In that order.
But not Goff? Goff is still on the board and we pick Lawson...
I'm bracing myself for this because I could see Baalke doing this....
Apr 9, 2016 at 12:08 AM
- 49ers808
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,632
Lawson at 7 is the worst pick that can happen for me. I like Dodd more than him and am willing to bet he's the better pro player
Apr 9, 2016 at 12:16 AM
- 49ers808
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,632
And no I wouldn't take Dodd at 7. Goff would be the pick in your scenario. This fo is already a circus, Gabbert is a FA next year, and if Kap does do well and hit it off with Kelly then that makes his trade value higher for next year while we develop Goff this year. I've seen Phoenix mention that having Kap on the roster will not alter us from taking a QB early (if Kelly wants him) I agree with that
Apr 9, 2016 at 12:19 AM
- 49ers808
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,632
Originally posted by ivanm05:Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:But not Goff? Goff is still on the board and we pick Lawson...
This is on the basis that we keep Kap. I think it would just be a circus/controversy if we take a qb that high with Kap still on the roster. I suppose you could always trade him afterwards.. but at that point you have no leverage and will probably be giving him away.
If we trade Kap then I'm all for grabbing a QB in the first round. Of course granted Goff or Wentz is available.
I think that if Kap and Chip hit it off and he stays then Trent will go defense w the 1st pick.
And it's not such a bad idea. The Kap Kelly could prove to be a good marriage..you could always take a qb later or next year.. let's not act like Goff is the hottest qb prospect in recent years either. What if we have the chance at a Watson next season?
If we have a chance at Watson next season then Kap/Kelly was not a good marriage
Apr 9, 2016 at 12:24 AM
- ivanm05
- Veteran
- Posts: 665
Originally posted by 49ers808:Originally posted by ivanm05:Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:But not Goff? Goff is still on the board and we pick Lawson...
This is on the basis that we keep Kap. I think it would just be a circus/controversy if we take a qb that high with Kap still on the roster. I suppose you could always trade him afterwards.. but at that point you have no leverage and will probably be giving him away.
If we trade Kap then I'm all for grabbing a QB in the first round. Of course granted Goff or Wentz is available.
I think that if Kap and Chip hit it off and he stays then Trent will go defense w the 1st pick.
And it's not such a bad idea. The Kap Kelly could prove to be a good marriage..you could always take a qb later or next year.. let's not act like Goff is the hottest qb prospect in recent years either. What if we have the chance at a Watson next season?
If we have a chance at Watson next season then Kap/Kelly was not a good marriage
That's what I'm saying.. if it doesn't work out we can take a qb next year.. we don't have to necessarily take one this year.
Apr 9, 2016 at 12:28 AM
- ivanm05
- Veteran
- Posts: 665
Originally posted by 49ers808:And no I wouldn't take Dodd at 7. Goff would be the pick in your scenario. This fo is already a circus, Gabbert is a FA next year, and if Kap does do well and hit it off with Kelly then that makes his trade value higher for next year while we develop Goff this year. I've seen Phoenix mention that having Kap on the roster will not alter us from taking a QB early (if Kelly wants him) I agree with that
Hey listen, I like Goff..I would take goff but when I consider how Baalkes drafted.. my gut tells me he would draft defense...I have a gut feeling the pick will be Lawson or Hargraves..that's just what my gut is. Putting aside my own personal preferences.
Apr 9, 2016 at 1:00 AM
- theninermaniac
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,430
This is certainly a Baalke draft
You must be smoking dust to take Lawson at 7.
You must be smoking dust to take Lawson at 7.
Apr 9, 2016 at 7:14 AM
- ivanm05
- Veteran
- Posts: 665
Originally posted by theninermaniac:This is certainly a Baalke draft![]()
![]()
![]()
You must be smoking dust to take Lawson at 7.
Well I think we have to brace ourselves to the idea that Buckner and Bosa, Jack, will not be there at 7.
Everyone is screaming for Goff which tells me he won't be the pick. Baalke has never pleased the masses with his 1st round pick.. not to say that he pays attention to what the fans want haha, just that it's never turned out that way.
And at that point who do you take? I can see him going hargraves.. but pass rush is a bigger need. And Lawson is unique in that he's just as good against the run as he is against the pass.. its not so crazy he goes at 7.
Hes been mocked going as high to us by Bucky Brooks.. also to the bucs at 9.. so it's one of the more realistic possibilities in my eyes.. at least I'm bracing myself for it.
Apr 9, 2016 at 7:14 AM
- ivanm05
- Veteran
- Posts: 665
Originally posted by theninermaniac:This is certainly a Baalke draft![]()
![]()
![]()
You must be smoking dust to take Lawson at 7.
Well I think we have to brace ourselves to the idea that Buckner and Bosa, Jack, will not be there at 7.
Everyone is screaming for Goff which tells me he won't be the pick. Baalke has never pleased the masses with his 1st round pick.. not to say that he pays attention to what the fans want haha, just that it's never turned out that way.
And at that point who do you take? I can see him going hargraves.. but pass rush is a bigger need. And Lawson is unique in that he's just as good against the run as he is against the pass.. its not so crazy he goes at 7.
Hes been mocked going as high to us by Bucky Brooks.. also to the bucs at 9.. so it's one of the more realistic possibilities in my eyes.. at least I'm bracing myself for it.