KID9R 2016 Draft + FA Mock

Not bad at all. Pretty good actually. I wouldnt be upset about this.

Thanks

You do know we resigned Phil?

Not sure I'm reading this right you have us signing RG3 along with trading for hundley, drafting dak and still have Blaine???

What makes hundley worth a 3rd? He's done zero in the league to push up his value from what he was drafted at which was a 5th. It makes zero sense to give up a third, draft dak, and bring in RG3 while having Blaine.

You have us taking two centers?

I love the first two picks but the rest

wont work.... WE HAVE NO OFFENSIVE LINE AT ALL! That is first priory if baalke stays at the warriors games through free agency

ps. your golden boy hundley would ruin his careere starting behind this line lol

Love trading for Hundley. That's one option I never thought of. Buckner is my favorite player in this draft so I would love that as well

Originally posted by fan49:

wont work.... WE HAVE NO OFFENSIVE LINE AT ALL! That is first priory if baalke stays at the warriors games through free agency

To be fair there are 2 OL in the mock draft. I'd like to see this with a bolstering of the front 7.

Originally posted by ltrain:

Originally posted by fan49:
wont work.... WE HAVE NO OFFENSIVE LINE AT ALL! That is first priory if baalke stays at the warriors games through free agency

To be fair there are 2 OL in the mock draft. I'd like to see this with a bolstering of the front 7.

4th round????

Originally posted by NYniner85:
You do know we resigned Phil?

Not sure I'm reading this right you have us signing RG3 along with trading for hundley, drafting dak and still have Blaine???

What makes hundley worth a 3rd? He's done zero in the league to push up his value from what he was drafted at which was a 5th. It makes zero sense to give up a third, draft dak, and bring in RG3 while having Blaine.

You have us taking two centers?

I love the first two picks but the rest

I couldn't find anything saying that Phil's contract was guaranteed, so I'm projecting he gets cut in camp.

If you'll read roster notes I was undecided with RG3 and Blaine and was looking for input. One's gone for sure. Or more likely RG3 was never got.

Hundley is worth a 3rd because the Packers spent a 5th on him just last year and are comfortable enough with him to let Tolzien go. So to get any decent return on their investment I can't see them taking less then a 3rd.

I have us taking 1 center that would be better suited to Guard. A 1 Guard that is better suited to Center. 1 of each.

The Browns aren't giving up their 3rd round pick for Kaepernick. They wanted him to take an absurd pay cut before trading that pick. Other than that, like the draft a lot - Buckner would be a solid pick at 7 if the QB's are gone, I'd be happy if we traded back up into the first round for Ogbah, and I want Prescott if he falls that far (he probably will still go in the 4th round, but Scooby Wright doesn't have the athleticism to hold up in coverage so I'd be fine taking him there).

Originally posted by KID9R:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

You do know we resigned Phil?

Not sure I'm reading this right you have us signing RG3 along with trading for hundley, drafting dak and still have Blaine???

What makes hundley worth a 3rd? He's done zero in the league to push up his value from what he was drafted at which was a 5th. It makes zero sense to give up a third, draft dak, and bring in RG3 while having Blaine.

You have us taking two centers?

I love the first two picks but the rest

I couldn't find anything saying that Phil's contract was guaranteed, so I'm projecting he gets cut in camp.

If you'll read roster notes I was undecided with RG3 and Blaine and was looking for input. One's gone for sure. Or more likely RG3 was never got.

Hundley is worth a 3rd because the Packers spent a 5th on him just last year and are comfortable enough with him to let Tolzien go. So to get any decent return on their investment I can't see them taking less then a 3rd.

I have us taking 1 center that would be better suited to Guard. A 1 Guard that is better suited to Center. 1 of each.

Phil got 1 yr $3 million guaranteed. There's no way they get rid of Blaine and his $2 million...RG3 is gonna want at the very least something like chase Daniels got which was 3 yr $21 million. So I'd say keep Blaine he's athletic and young.

Who cares if their GM cut lord tolzien lol they just drafted hundley so it doesn't surprise me at all. He hasnt done anything in he league to justify a top 100 pick at all. I who hate that move especially the fact that you draft dak.

Hate the idea of drafting OL for postions they didn't play in college.

Sorry dude just giving my feedback.

Originally posted by fan49:
wont work.... WE HAVE NO OFFENSIVE LINE AT ALL! That is first priory if baalke stays at the warriors games through free agency

My thinking was that,
Staley is solid.
Trent Brown while he only started two games, he played pretty good. But he'd still have to beat out AD.
According to Pro Football Focus Tiller was the 18th best guard in the league last year. I don't know why it took so long for Jim to start him over Devey.

Kilgore played ok a couple years ago, but will have heavy competition from the rookie/s and Martin.
We'll then have a open competition for the LG spot between about 5 OLs or so.
So many people here are afraid to start a rookie OL unless he was a 1st or 2nd round pick.
3 Centers were drafted in rounds 4 to 6 last year. 23 starts.
4 drafted in 2014. 57 starts as rookies
Centers especially seem more apt to start as rookies.

Imo Baalke and Chip are rightly using this season as a assessment season. We have so many young players that haven't seen the field I'm not sure even Baalke knows what they have in them. Then next year we should have even more cap space to hit FA for a couple needs.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by KID9R:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
You do know we resigned Phil?

Not sure I'm reading this right you have us signing RG3 along with trading for hundley, drafting dak and still have Blaine???

What makes hundley worth a 3rd? He's done zero in the league to push up his value from what he was drafted at which was a 5th. It makes zero sense to give up a third, draft dak, and bring in RG3 while having Blaine.

You have us taking two centers?

I love the first two picks but the rest

I couldn't find anything saying that Phil's contract was guaranteed, so I'm projecting he gets cut in camp.

If you'll read roster notes I was undecided with RG3 and Blaine and was looking for input. One's gone for sure. Or more likely RG3 was never got.

Hundley is worth a 3rd because the Packers spent a 5th on him just last year and are comfortable enough with him to let Tolzien go. So to get any decent return on their investment I can't see them taking less then a 3rd.

I have us taking 1 center that would be better suited to Guard. A 1 Guard that is better suited to Center. 1 of each.

Phil got 1 yr $3 million guaranteed. There's no way they get rid of Blaine and his $2 million...RG3 is gonna want at the very least something like chase Daniels got which was 3 yr $21 million. So I'd say keep Blaine he's athletic and young.

Who cares if their GM cut lord tolzien lol they just drafted hundley so it doesn't surprise me at all. He hasnt done anything in he league to justify a top 100 pick at all. I who hate that move especially the fact that you draft dak.

Hate the idea of drafting OL for postions they didn't play in college.

Sorry dude just giving my feedback.

Ok. Let's pretend that Chip really wants Hundley. He tells Baalke "I GOT TO HAVE HIM"
If "you" were the Packers, what would it take to get him?

Originally posted by KID9R:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by KID9R:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

You do know we resigned Phil?

Not sure I'm reading this right you have us signing RG3 along with trading for hundley, drafting dak and still have Blaine???

What makes hundley worth a 3rd? He's done zero in the league to push up his value from what he was drafted at which was a 5th. It makes zero sense to give up a third, draft dak, and bring in RG3 while having Blaine.

You have us taking two centers?

I love the first two picks but the rest

I couldn't find anything saying that Phil's contract was guaranteed, so I'm projecting he gets cut in camp.

If you'll read roster notes I was undecided with RG3 and Blaine and was looking for input. One's gone for sure. Or more likely RG3 was never got.

Hundley is worth a 3rd because the Packers spent a 5th on him just last year and are comfortable enough with him to let Tolzien go. So to get any decent return on their investment I can't see them taking less then a 3rd.

I have us taking 1 center that would be better suited to Guard. A 1 Guard that is better suited to Center. 1 of each.

Phil got 1 yr $3 million guaranteed. There's no way they get rid of Blaine and his $2 million...RG3 is gonna want at the very least something like chase Daniels got which was 3 yr $21 million. So I'd say keep Blaine he's athletic and young.

Who cares if their GM cut lord tolzien lol they just drafted hundley so it doesn't surprise me at all. He hasnt done anything in he league to justify a top 100 pick at all. I who hate that move especially the fact that you draft dak.

Hate the idea of drafting OL for postions they didn't play in college.

Sorry dude just giving my feedback.

Ok. Let's pretend that Chip really wants Hundley. He tells Baalke "I GOT TO HAVE HIM"
If "you" were the Packers, what would it take to get him?

I mean the packers can ask whatever they want for him...I don't think he's worth more than a 5th, he didn't show anything that made him higher than his original pick and GB valued him as a 5th because that's when they drafted him.