Not bad draft but I think your free agents are a tad unrealistic.
Norman and Jeffrey aren't going anywhere but if their respective teams let them hit free agency I'm not sure we'd get a chance to sign them.
There are 290 users in the forums
Ivanm05's V-Day Mock Plan to Fall in Love With
Feb 14, 2016 at 5:41 PM
- genus49
- Moderator
- Posts: 28,127
Feb 14, 2016 at 5:42 PM
- LasVegasWally
- Veteran
- Posts: 24,838
Originally posted by genus49:
Not bad draft but I think your free agents are a tad unrealistic.
Norman and Jeffrey aren't going anywhere but if their respective teams let them hit free agency I'm not sure we'd get a chance to sign them.
Agree
Feb 14, 2016 at 5:53 PM
- ivanm05
- Veteran
- Posts: 649
Originally posted by genus49:
Not bad draft but I think your free agents are a tad unrealistic.
Norman and Jeffrey aren't going anywhere but if their respective teams let them hit free agency I'm not sure we'd get a chance to sign them.
Originally posted by LasVegasWally:
Originally posted by genus49:
Not bad draft but I think your free agents are a tad unrealistic.
Norman and Jeffrey aren't going anywhere but if their respective teams let them hit free agency I'm not sure we'd get a chance to sign them.
Agree
I hear you guys. In my last mock i was realistic with the Free Agency signings and was bashed for it, so at this point you're kinda damned if you do or damned if you don't haha.. do hope we can land at least one big fish. And if we can I would want it to be Norman.
[ Edited by ivanm05 on Feb 14, 2016 at 5:53 PM ]
Feb 14, 2016 at 6:21 PM
- joaosoarrs99
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,096
Too much focus on OL and DL and unrealistic FAs.
Feb 14, 2016 at 6:23 PM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 118,897
This is so far from realistic sorry man
Feb 14, 2016 at 6:30 PM
- ivanm05
- Veteran
- Posts: 649
Originally posted by NYniner85:
This is so far from realistic sorry man
Honestly, you guys are just laughable at this point. In my last mock i was pretty spot on with the free agent signings and everyone was going crazy about how I didn't have any big free agent signings. You guys already know we're not going to have any big signings so why go crazy about it? Today I had a little fun with it and now its just ridiculous. You guys need to choose one. Are we getting any big signings or not? Because there's not much in between. Look at the market,
And the draft is pretty realistic. Tell me where I'm way off? Please.
Feb 14, 2016 at 6:36 PM
- ivanm05
- Veteran
- Posts: 649
And please don't say Malik Jackson. He's not that great. And Muhammad Wilkerson,like Norman and Jeffrey isn't hitting free agency. So don't say him either.
Feb 14, 2016 at 6:54 PM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 118,897
Originally posted by ivanm05:Originally posted by NYniner85:This is so far from realistic sorry man
Honestly, you guys are just laughable at this point. In my last mock i was pretty spot on with the free agent signings and everyone was going crazy about how I didn't have any big free agent signings. You guys already know we're not going to have any big signings so why go crazy about it? Today I had a little fun with it and now its just ridiculous. You guys need to choose one. Are we getting any big signings or not? Because there's not much in between. Look at the market,
And the draft is pretty realistic. Tell me where I'm way off? Please.
Jeffery and Norman have both been talked about as getting tagged you have us signing Williams drafting Buckner and butler why??? It's complete over kill and same with all the OL we usually only have 8 active what are you doing with the other 6? You cant put them on the pratice squad they will be scooped up in two seconds.
Nassib is a 4-3 DE not a 3-4 OLB...in all its just not realistic would it be awesome sure but it's not happening.
It's cool to have fun with it but don't get all bent out of shape if someone says it's not realistic
Feb 14, 2016 at 6:56 PM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 118,897
Originally posted by ivanm05:And please don't say Malik Jackson. He's not that great. And Muhammad Wilkerson,like Norman and Jeffrey isn't hitting free agency. So don't say him either.
Okay so your saying Jeffery and Norman aren't hitting FA so why even having them in your mock
Please explain why Jackson isn't good?
Feb 14, 2016 at 7:05 PM
- stonecold590
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,382
I think you would be better off typing in that you would be happy to get 2 from this list of FAs.
That way it doesn't look like you are wanting all of them. Even if every one of them came knocking on the 9ers door wanting us to sign them we could only afford 3 of them max. Norman will want TOP $. Jeffries is going to get good $$. Trevathan is going to get good $$ where ever he goes, as will Osmele. Trent won't pay much for Guards so he would take a big discount coming here.
Overall I like the draft. Like the cuts made. I will stop reading if Pears is not cut.
That way it doesn't look like you are wanting all of them. Even if every one of them came knocking on the 9ers door wanting us to sign them we could only afford 3 of them max. Norman will want TOP $. Jeffries is going to get good $$. Trevathan is going to get good $$ where ever he goes, as will Osmele. Trent won't pay much for Guards so he would take a big discount coming here.
Overall I like the draft. Like the cuts made. I will stop reading if Pears is not cut.
Feb 14, 2016 at 7:09 PM
- ivanm05
- Veteran
- Posts: 649
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by ivanm05:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
This is so far from realistic sorry man
Honestly, you guys are just laughable at this point. In my last mock i was pretty spot on with the free agent signings and everyone was going crazy about how I didn't have any big free agent signings. You guys already know we're not going to have any big signings so why go crazy about it? Today I had a little fun with it and now its just ridiculous. You guys need to choose one. Are we getting any big signings or not? Because there's not much in between. Look at the market,
And the draft is pretty realistic. Tell me where I'm way off? Please.
Jeffery and Norman have both been talked about as getting tagged you have us signing Williams drafting Buckner and butler why??? It's complete over kill and same with all the OL we usually only have 8 active what are you doing with the other 6? You cant put them on the pratice squad they will be scooped up in two seconds.
Nassib is a 4-3 DE not a 3-4 OLB...in all its just not realistic would it be awesome sure but it's not happening.
It's cool to have fun with it but don't get all bent out of shape if someone says it's not realistic
Yeah all the big names are going to be tagged. That's what I told everyone last time. Buckner is a Defensive End and Butler is a Defensive Tackle. How is that overkill? You would have a starting rotation of Buckner, Butler and Armstead. With Williams and Dial rotating in. We have zero depth a long the dline. Outside of Dial and maybe TJE, who do you really have. Tank is moving to OLB.
And I'm sorry but please go down this list and tell me where Nassib is:
http://www.drafttek.com/2016-NFL-Draft-Prospect-Rankings/Top-College-34-Outside-LBs-2016-Draft.asp
here's some more on nassib: " It would benefit Nassib if he spends his free time working some linebacker skills. If he's unable to add bulk, he'll be looking at a potential move to outside linebacker in a 3-4 alignment."
I'm not being unrealistic for thinking this.
And I'm not getting bent out of shape. I just think it's funny.
And as far as loading up on the dline and oline. With chip's offense you guys do realize the defense is going to be on the field way, way more. Like twice as much as last season. We need a deeper rotation to keep the defense durable and fresh, let alone efficient. And our O-line was so atrocious last year, that by the end of the year our 7th round pick was our bright spot. I'm sorry but I'll take as many quality offensive linemen as I can and let Chip figure out who stays and who goes.
Feb 14, 2016 at 7:15 PM
- ivanm05
- Veteran
- Posts: 649
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by ivanm05:
And please don't say Malik Jackson. He's not that great. And Muhammad Wilkerson,like Norman and Jeffrey isn't hitting free agency. So don't say him either.
Okay so your saying Jeffery and Norman aren't hitting FA so why even having them in your mock![]()
Please explain why Jackson isn't good?
Well I didn't have them in my first one either and everyone thought I should have had a much better haul with our salary cap. And I'm sorry but I would like to think that if we're using up our salary cap that it would be for really good players not just adding decent players for the sake of filling up the cap. That was the idea behind adding Norman and Jeffrey.
Thats why I had minimal siginings with my other mock. But that wasn't realistic either.
Andf there's nothing wrong with Jackson but everyone wants him and I don't see how he's better than anything can address in the draft. Besides, Broncos are already in talks to resign him.
Feb 14, 2016 at 7:18 PM
- ivanm05
- Veteran
- Posts: 649
Originally posted by stonecold590:
I think you would be better off typing in that you would be happy to get 2 from this list of FAs.
That way it doesn't look like you are wanting all of them. Even if every one of them came knocking on the 9ers door wanting us to sign them we could only afford 3 of them max. Norman will want TOP $. Jeffries is going to get good $$. Trevathan is going to get good $$ where ever he goes, as will Osmele. Trent won't pay much for Guards so he would take a big discount coming here.
Overall I like the draft. Like the cuts made. I will stop reading if Pears is not cut.
Yeah I hear you man. If We could add one free agent, then I would want it to be Norman.
Feb 14, 2016 at 9:21 PM
- btthepunk
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,304
It's a great draft. I don't know if I'd take a NT in the 2nd if if we keep Ian Williams though. Not a bad pick by any means though.
[ Edited by btthepunk on Feb 15, 2016 at 8:43 AM ]
