Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by ivanm05:
People just become too consumed with perceptions and names .. I like.doing mocks and having my draft crushes but I never really get too involved that I become upset if they're not taken..if I some how hit on one or two a year then I think it's awesome but that's it.
Because what happens then is that you're judging the draft based on your own wants...how silly is that
I've long learned that these guys all know what they're doing. They study these players all years and construct meticulous boards and contingency plans...we watch a 5 minute video on YouTube and think the player is the second coming of such and such.... It's fun to do don't get me wrong but by no means should we use that add basis to judge draft picks...
I understand a lot of you wanted a wr today but d Smith was of the board... So was Dorial ... U could make the case for strong but maybe the wrist scared them away..
All I can recommend is too sit back and enjoy the show Don't get too caught up with your own wants because more than likely it's not gonna happen..
When Reid has.to miss a game because of a hamstring or whatever you'll be happy Tartt is on the field instead of Dahl... So don't trip.
Nice post.
Me too!

Great post
People get their knickers in a twist in the draft when the team doesn't get "value" according to some draftnik's big board. Or they get them in a double twist when they DO pick whom everyone thought they'd pick (see Armstead, Arik). Then there's the draft crushes, and the bizarre situation when EVERY player who gets picked before we get to pick elicits a

or

from 2 or 3 people. It's not only the WRs in this year, though the toy throwing over DGB was extremely funny to see. What was even funnier was that during Round 3, pretty much EVERY single player who was picked before we got on the clock got an overventilating reaction from half the board. Oh, Duke Johnson, I wanted him. Oh, there goes Strong - angry smiley. Oh, no more Conley - I'm not watching any more of the draft! As if we could sign (and start) all those players, even if the other teams didn't get to pick too. It's beyond silly.
Now, I'm not saying that all our picks will pan out. We might hit a series of homers like in '11. Or strike out like no other time like in '12. Who knows? In '11 everyone started breathing into a paper bag when we picked Smith. OMG, a "reach"! My pills, now! That idiot Walter Football yelled at us because we didn't pick, wait for it, Gabbert. But in '12 everyone thought AJ Jenkins was a horrible pick, and he was. I'm not normally a rosy glasses person either. I actually expect us to finish around .500 again this year, which would suck. But the great fun of the draft is this eternal hope that all your picks will be Pro Bowlers, and that all our out-of-the-box "reaches" are in fact "steals". And most of all, I LOVE bizarre picks like Tartt. They make me think, "OK, now what was the team ACTUALLY thinking? Is he depth? Are we trying to move to the Big Nickel, and how? Is it better to get a really good strong safety than an iffy ILB?". I get to think schemes, go and READ about the player, but really read about him.
These are the things that make the draft interesting for me, not the half-arsed game theory of "steals" and "reaches" and "value" of the draft sites. Let's face it: as a spectacle the draft is beyond silly: a bunch of people in suits reading out names. A kind of bingo, only with added embarrassing man hugs on Goodell, and hearing the phrase "I'm blessed" 64 times per night. It's the pondering over what the picks might mean for my team's scheme that make it interesting for me.