Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by All22:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by shmuck:
Aldon could be gone after 2015 and Gregory would likely be BPA by a wide margin.
IF Aldon was gonna be gone it would have happened by now IMO....you don't let top pass rushers leave. Gregory isn't a upgrade over Aldon and would be riding the pine behind Lynch,Smith,Brooks.
Nah, with that group we'd have a ton of options:
- We can run a NASCAR package to terrorize passing teams.
- On basedowns we could move Lynch or Aldon to DE.
- We could rotate pass rushers like the Seahawks
- We could move Brooks to ILB
- We could cut or trade Brooks.
At this point we aren't cutting brooks THIS year. He's still a effective player, he weights 270 lbs and can not be a ILB.
Cutting him next year will save us around $6.5 million that can go towards Smith's new deal. If Gregory wants to be a OLB in SF he's gonna have to gain 30 lbs (lynch/smith/Brooks are 270)...why move them to DE? they are good at OLB.
Gregory would be a 3rd-down pass rusher his rookie year, do you take Smith or Lynch our on 3rd downs?
Hate the idea, doesn't make sense and it takes snaps away from two of our best young players.
You move them to DE because a 4-man DL (nickel) is our base defense anyway...
And we're overstocked at OLB and understocked at DE. Besides, would you pass on Robert Quinn or would you figure out a way to make it work.
Like I said, the Giants won superbowls with a similar package.
I'd rather have Randy Gregory at 15 than Arik Armstead, a RB who will split carries with Hyde, or a WR that will at best be our #3.
Also, I liked Lynch better when he was heavier and playing inside.
[ Edited by All22 on Apr 7, 2015 at 9:06 AM ]