There are 823 users in the forums
Nothing clever to call it draft
Apr 22, 2014 at 7:46 PM
- DeHubb
- Veteran
- Posts: 465
I like it minus the Dri Archer pick... rather have a better pure slot receiver, if your going with Seastrunk with the next pick.. and i love the Seastrunk pick
Apr 22, 2014 at 7:55 PM
- Travisty13
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,269
4 CBs and 2 interior lineman, yet no ILB, OLB, or DE. Not a fan really of this draft.
[ Edited by Travisty13 on Apr 22, 2014 at 7:57 PM ]
Apr 22, 2014 at 8:12 PM
- Bluesbro
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,417
I will admit that omitting a LB is probably a mistake, although I am expecting Bowman back in the second half of the year. D-line is not necessary imo, considering a bon fide first rounder in Carradine will be healthy. Dial may fill a need too. As far as four CB's, there and contingency picks that depend on other things. Colvin is a redshirt.
But your points are acknowledged. Thanks.
But your points are acknowledged. Thanks.
Apr 22, 2014 at 8:12 PM
- pwillis52beasty
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,410
Originally posted by Travisty13:
4 CBs and 2 interior lineman, yet no ILB, OLB, or DE. Not a fan really of this draft.
Yup. You need an OLB and DE in there at least.
Apr 22, 2014 at 8:15 PM
- Travisty13
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,269
Originally posted by Bluesbro:I will admit that omitting a LB is probably a mistake, although I am expecting Bowman back in the second half of the year. D-line is not necessary imo, considering a bon fide first rounder in Carradine will be healthy. Dial may fill a need too. As far as four CB's, there and contingency picks that depend on other things. Colvin is a redshirt.
But your points are acknowledged. Thanks.
To be fair, I like most the players you drafted. Like the Archer, Gaines, and Seastruck picks mostly. Just think it's overkill with that many CBs, when a developmental ILB or OLB or DE could be had.
Apr 22, 2014 at 9:16 PM
- m_brockalexander
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,379
Originally posted by Travisty13:4 CBs and 2 interior lineman, yet no ILB, OLB, or DE. Not a fan really of this draft.
Co-signed
Apr 22, 2014 at 9:21 PM
- KyleShanahan
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,779
Not bad. Colvin will be gone by 245 tho
Apr 22, 2014 at 9:31 PM
- T-9ers
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,820
so you think benjamin falls to #56? ain't seeing that
Apr 22, 2014 at 10:52 PM
- MC9BEAT
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,173
I can see going CB.then WR and CB in rd 2. Might have to switch to Latimer at #56.
Try a pass rusher at #77 then maybe O-line and 2nd WR or Archer or Seastrunk to end rd 3. Martin may still be there at #94
Don't need another O-lineman for this year at #170 so that would be a good spot for Aaron Colvin or G Brandon Thomas if Colvin is off the board and both would be red
shirt picks.
Wouldn't mind Sunseri or Whitley, pup list safties in the 7th round to red shirt for next year. G Spencer Long would be a good 7th rd pick as well if we don't get Thomas earlier.
Try a pass rusher at #77 then maybe O-line and 2nd WR or Archer or Seastrunk to end rd 3. Martin may still be there at #94
Don't need another O-lineman for this year at #170 so that would be a good spot for Aaron Colvin or G Brandon Thomas if Colvin is off the board and both would be red
shirt picks.
Wouldn't mind Sunseri or Whitley, pup list safties in the 7th round to red shirt for next year. G Spencer Long would be a good 7th rd pick as well if we don't get Thomas earlier.
Apr 22, 2014 at 11:47 PM
- theninermaniac
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,430
We will trade up, therefore I do not like this mock
Apr 23, 2014 at 2:14 PM
- Bluesbro
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,417
Good thing I don't have Baalke's job ... lol. The funny thing about these mocks is there will not be any one of them that is close. Someone mentioned Benjamin being available where I had him. That is right about where he is projected depending on what list you reference. But it depends if there is a run on wideouts early, or if some GM drafting ahead in enamored.
Thank you all for the comments.
Thank you all for the comments.