*Mathmatically Possible* MOCK

Forgive me but we give up an early pick next year and still don't fill all our needs?

This is a deep draft. I would prefer to stick and take what's available. And certainly not use up part of next years picks.

Originally posted by English:
Forgive me but we give up an early pick next year and still don't fill all our needs?

This is a deep draft. I would prefer to stick and take what's available. And certainly not use up part of next years picks.

Let's see. Two 1st round picks, two 2nd round picks, two 3rd round picks and a 4th and 5th round pick for 2 CB's and a small speed WR. Doesn't sound to good to me either.

Originally posted by MC9BEAT:

Originally posted by English:

Forgive me but we give up an early pick next year and still don't fill all our needs?

This is a deep draft. I would prefer to stick and take what's available. And certainly not use up part of next years picks.

Let's see. Two 1st round picks, two 2nd round picks, two 3rd round picks and a 4th and 5th round pick for 2 CB's and a small speed WR. Doesn't sound to good to me either.

Actually, it could be one 1st, this years #30 and three 2nds depending on the trade partner.

Given three picks in the top 40 as equal trade chart value, with #15 being the highest, is there a stronger 3 players you think could step in and contribute more to our immediate needs?

With that 3.37 40 time, Gilbert won't last long!

Originally posted by Murphys1:

With that 3.37 40 time, Gilbert won't last long!

Thus giving up early picks to secure his services.....

Thanks, correcting now.

Originally posted by CWin4949:

Originally posted by MC9BEAT:

Originally posted by English:
Forgive me but we give up an early pick next year and still don't fill all our needs?

This is a deep draft. I would prefer to stick and take what's available. And certainly not use up part of next years picks.

Let's see. Two 1st round picks, two 2nd round picks, two 3rd round picks and a 4th and 5th round pick for 2 CB's and a small speed WR. Doesn't sound to good to me either.

Actually, it could be one 1st, this years #30 and three 2nds depending on the trade partner.

Given three picks in the top 40 as equal trade chart value, with #15 being the highest, is there a stronger 3 players you think could step in and contribute more to our immediate needs?

Seeing as though you are using 9 picks to get those 3 players the real question is if there is a stronger 9 players than those 3.
How about Kyle Fuller,Donte Moncreif,Gabe Jackson,Cody Latimer,Pierre Desir,Craig Loston,Dri Archer,Aaron Colvin plus our 2nd or 1st round pick in 2015?

Originally posted by MC9BEAT:

Originally posted by CWin4949:

Originally posted by MC9BEAT:

Originally posted by English:

Forgive me but we give up an early pick next year and still don't fill all our needs?

This is a deep draft. I would prefer to stick and take what's available. And certainly not use up part of next years picks.

Let's see. Two 1st round picks, two 2nd round picks, two 3rd round picks and a 4th and 5th round pick for 2 CB's and a small speed WR. Doesn't sound to good to me either.

Actually, it could be one 1st, this years #30 and three 2nds depending on the trade partner.

Given three picks in the top 40 as equal trade chart value, with #15 being the highest, is there a stronger 3 players you think could step in and contribute more to our immediate needs?

Seeing as though you are using 9 picks to get those 3 players the real question is if there is a stronger 9 players than those 3.
How about Kyle Fuller,Donte Moncreif,Gabe Jackson,Cody Latimer,Pierre Desir,Craig Loston,Dri Archer,Aaron Colvin plus our 2nd or 1st round pick in 2015?

Agree with you on the numbers, but are 9 players from this draft going to make the 53 man roster?

Originally posted by CWin4949:

Originally posted by MC9BEAT:

Originally posted by CWin4949:

Originally posted by MC9BEAT:

Originally posted by English:
Forgive me but we give up an early pick next year and still don't fill all our needs?

This is a deep draft. I would prefer to stick and take what's available. And certainly not use up part of next years picks.

Let's see. Two 1st round picks, two 2nd round picks, two 3rd round picks and a 4th and 5th round pick for 2 CB's and a small speed WR. Doesn't sound to good to me either.

Actually, it could be one 1st, this years #30 and three 2nds depending on the trade partner.

Given three picks in the top 40 as equal trade chart value, with #15 being the highest, is there a stronger 3 players you think could step in and contribute more to our immediate needs?

Seeing as though you are using 9 picks to get those 3 players the real question is if there is a stronger 9 players than those 3.
How about Kyle Fuller,Donte Moncreif,Gabe Jackson,Cody Latimer,Pierre Desir,Craig Loston,Dri Archer,Aaron Colvin plus our 2nd or 1st round pick in 2015?

Agree with you on the numbers, but are 9 players from this draft going to make the 53 man roster?

Those 9 would make the team with Colvin heading for the pup list. 2 CB's make your draft and 2 are in my list. We could spot 2 WR's - we would have to dump Baldwin and maybe Osgood or LLoyd, Jackson could replace Looney or Snyder assuming we have no preseason injuries,Loston could replace 1 of our back up safties, Archer would be the return man we have needed.

Originally posted by Murphys1:
With that 3.37 40 time, Gilbert won't last long!

Lol that's one fast mother f**ker.


This would be very sexy coming away with those three guys, but it's too much to give up in my opinion. We need to address OLB, DE, ILB, Center, and possibly safety as well. And it'd be nice to fill those positions within the first 5 rounds.

I would love to have Gilbert, Verrett and Cook on the team but seriously giving up all these picks in this years draft which is one of the best in memory AND a high pick next year is just bad roster management. Sure, we need CBs and a speed WR, you even grab a nice OLB, OG here and our roster would def be improved for next season but this isn't how you sustain a good young roster.

Agree w/English...your mock gives up too much for not enough reward. Not sure Gilbert's worth trading up far for. Some think Dennard's better. Verrett's fine, but getting Fuller would be just as effective IMHO without giving up much to get him.

Cooks is the only WR taken. I know Baalke likes him and all, but in the NFC West you'd better have some good-sized WR's in addition to speed. With Crabtree entering the last year on his rookie contract, it'd be wise to draft his potential replacement. Pair Cooks up w/another bigger WR with speed and you have something moving forward.

Ellis sounds imposing all right, but projects as a NT in Fangio's defense. That's not really a position of need. A 5-technique guy to groom as Ray Mac's replacement would be a better option. It's possible they're looking at Jerod-Eddie as that guy, but not sure that's a given.

An OLB in the 7th rd...if they do cut ties w/Aldon, I'd think Baalke would go after a Marcus Smith, Attaochu, Ford or maybe Lawrence. You have no ILB in your mock...I'd expect Baalke to get one for depth/future starter.

Although a late rd pick, don't really see much of a need for another OG/OT. With Martin, Seymour, Looney and Snyder, Harbaugh's got good OL depth.

Pass. Too much given up for too little return.

Originally posted by English:
Forgive me but we give up an early pick next year and still don't fill all our needs?

This is a deep draft. I would prefer to stick and take what's available. And certainly not use up part of next years picks.

This x1000.

I think we can do a hell of a lot better w/this deep draft.