There are 399 users in the forums
Early Look at 2014 Draft
Dec 7, 2013 at 2:22 PM
- AB81Rules
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 33,994
Sorry to burst your bubble, but Watkins is a top 10 pick at worst. And Carr is a 1st round pick, probably top 10-15.
Dec 7, 2013 at 3:34 PM
- Phoenix49ers
- Veteran
- Posts: 131,741
Is this the fantasyland draft or what?
Dec 7, 2013 at 7:29 PM
- tohara3
- Veteran
- Posts: 30,681
I wouldn't be mad at a trade up for Watkins!
Dec 7, 2013 at 10:13 PM
- m_brockalexander
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,379
Someone needs to do their homework.........
[ Edited by m_brockalexander on Dec 7, 2013 at 10:15 PM ]
Dec 7, 2013 at 11:20 PM
- tatdwolf49
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,206
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:Is this the fantasyland draft or what?![]()
Maybe he was playin madden ????
Dec 7, 2013 at 11:51 PM
- IdahoNiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,543
in addition to what others have said....Carr in the 4th?
Dec 8, 2013 at 6:18 AM
- LifelongNiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 24,646
I think this is the bigger question. Are we at the point where we should make a Julio Jones type of trade to get the top receiver available?
Dec 9, 2013 at 3:09 PM
- midrdan
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,982
Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
I think this is the bigger question. Are we at the point where we should make a Julio Jones type of trade to get the top receiver available?
Not unless you're comfortable sacrificing depth and the future for one player. Julio Jones is a very good receiver, but Atlanta, as a team, has significant weaknesses that will prevent them from winning it all. See, also, J.J. Stokes - we traded our 1st, 3rd, and 4th in 1995 and our 1st in 1996 for him. '96 was a great WR draft (we landed T. Owens in the late rounds) but what if we didn't acquire Stokes and used our first rounder in '96 on Marvin Harrison? Or Ray Lewis?
Dec 9, 2013 at 3:38 PM
- communist
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,475
Originally posted by LifelongNiner:That type of trade is only worth if you want to get another Jerry Rice. I still think that the Jones-trade was dumb, given what they could do with the traded picks (defense...).
I think this is the bigger question. Are we at the point where we should make a Julio Jones type of trade to get the top receiver available?
Said that, give away 1st, 2nd and even the 3rd-rounder to jump up 15 picks is way too much. Not to mention AB's object that Watkins is a top10 lock, at least...
Dec 9, 2013 at 11:32 PM
- tatdwolf49
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,206
Originally posted by midrdan:Originally posted by LifelongNiner:I think this is the bigger question. Are we at the point where we should make a Julio Jones type of trade to get the top receiver available?
Not unless you're comfortable sacrificing depth and the future for one player. Julio Jones is a very good receiver, but Atlanta, as a team, has significant weaknesses that will prevent them from winning it all. See, also, J.J. Stokes - we traded our 1st, 3rd, and 4th in 1995 and our 1st in 1996 for him. '96 was a great WR draft (we landed T. Owens in the late rounds) but what if we didn't acquire Stokes and used our first rounder in '96 on Marvin Harrison? Or Ray Lewis?
Yea N we kept JJ around for ever stinkin up tha place but couldnt give AJ 2 full yrz to become something...
Dec 10, 2013 at 8:43 AM
- Paul_Hofer
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,060
I'll propose heresy. Trade Patrick Willis and our first rounder for Watkins.
Dec 10, 2013 at 9:12 AM
- Buchy
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,833
I'm not a draft expert, but I have to question the value of us stocking 7th round picks etc.
On past form, we get a developmental steal with a 7th rounder and then put them through waivers while we stick to vets - those steals then get picked up on the waiver wire. In short, I think we should trade a number of them with our higher round picks to let us move up as we have to. There are a number of teams like Washington, Atlanta or the Borwns who need picks for rebuilding and might have their own targets in the lower rou nds to assist that.
On past form, we get a developmental steal with a 7th rounder and then put them through waivers while we stick to vets - those steals then get picked up on the waiver wire. In short, I think we should trade a number of them with our higher round picks to let us move up as we have to. There are a number of teams like Washington, Atlanta or the Borwns who need picks for rebuilding and might have their own targets in the lower rou nds to assist that.