Originally posted by pwillis52beasty:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
Originally posted by pwillis52beasty:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
im on the bandwagon. he's my 2nd choice at safety if we pass on Matt Elam.
I think he's the next best thing after Kenny Vaccarro. I'm not a fan of Matt Elam. Too similar to Whitner.
Still don't see the Whitner comparison besides height. Elam has more range and can play both safety positions. He's also better at man coverage than Whitner.
Maybe so, but their games are still very similar. Shorter athletic safeties who can hit, but neither is great in coverage. Not a fan of having both our safeties 5'10. Better to have at least one guy back their with some length to guard taller tight ends and receivers.
I see what you're saying, but I just don't buy it. Elam isn't "great" in coverage, but he's good. We run a completely different scheme than Florida and that could be to his benefit and he may learn how to cover better playing under Donatelle and Fangio.
Also, the Steelers' starting safeties are both under 6 feet. same goes for the Texans. if the safeties can play, then they can play. the fact that Elam and Whitner are both athletic is good to have. Elam's man coverage is also underrated.