There are 844 users in the forums
Dynasty Mock v1.0 A different mock
Apr 15, 2012 at 9:51 PM
- kronik
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,316
Awesome, would be thrilled
Apr 15, 2012 at 10:23 PM
- SonocoNinerFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 17,610
I think we need OLB depth too much to take two WR prospects. It's the one of the few areas, aside from re-signing Brooks, that Baalke hasn't addressed yet. We have practically zero depth.
Apr 15, 2012 at 11:22 PM
- Juggernaut49erFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 96
Originally posted by SonocoNinerFan:
I think we need OLB depth too much to take two WR prospects. It's the one of the few areas, aside from re-signing Brooks, that Baalke hasn't addressed yet. We have practically zero depth.
I agree, especially with the re-signing of Ginn. I think maybe a DL project who could be groomed for a spot in the DL rotation. Or an OLB for depth. Otherwise it's a nice draft
Apr 16, 2012 at 5:42 AM
- niners9
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,286
we dont need anymore RBs and no need to take another WR. maybe trade one of those for a ILB or OLB.
Apr 16, 2012 at 6:26 AM
- DynastyPart2
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,312
Originally posted by SonocoNinerFan:
I think we need OLB depth too much to take two WR prospects. It's the one of the few areas, aside from re-signing Brooks, that Baalke hasn't addressed yet. We have practically zero depth.
I thought about this as well; however, I just couldn't find any value at the positions we draft. I almost went with Shea McClellin at #37 instead of David Wilson; but I really feel like we are going to need a good RB down the stretch. I don't think Gore can hold up all season and Hunter still needs to bulk up before he can be an every down RB. I don't expect Jacobs or Dixon to make the team if we draft Wilson.
Thanks for the comments.
Apr 16, 2012 at 9:26 AM
- Rsrkshn
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,486
I like your mock and reasoning, especially Silatolu, if he's there! Arguably we need him (or someone like him) the most for the immediate future.
As SNF said, we need pass rush. Have to find a way to do that.
Wylie is a wasted pick IMO. He would not make the roster or the practice squad. Too many WRs on the roster already. Like the Streeter pick a lot - nothing proven, but has imressive potential and size to fill real need after a year or so of practice.
As SNF said, we need pass rush. Have to find a way to do that.
Wylie is a wasted pick IMO. He would not make the roster or the practice squad. Too many WRs on the roster already. Like the Streeter pick a lot - nothing proven, but has imressive potential and size to fill real need after a year or so of practice.
Apr 16, 2012 at 9:49 AM
- CorvaNinerFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,448
I'd make two changes...substitute Doug Martin for Wilson. He's bigger and arguably the most complete RB in the draft. Getting him could mean trading up...but, he's worth it. The other change I'd make is to draft Brian Quick instead of Streeter. They're similar sized, Streeter may be faster, but Quick has better hands and runs very precise routes, something Harbaugh would appreciate. I still think Baalke will trade up maybe twice to get better players...which means he could come out of the draft with say 4 very good players who'd have a legitimate chance to make the roster. Remember, the roster's already full...doesn't make a lot of sense to draft 7 players if only 3-4 have real shots at making the team. The others could be considered for PS, I get that, but I'm thinking Baalke's looking more for quality than quantity. I really like Wylie and Richardson...the former for his speed, pass-catching and KR skills, the latter for his size, toughness & all-around S skills. The fact he played in the tough SEC doesn't hurt, either.
Apr 16, 2012 at 10:13 AM
- stonecold590
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,385
I like it. It fills needs. We have the team already to where we can move and pick players to help us fill a need as a starter or as depth. Too many people what a sexy, huge splash type draft. We dont need that.
One thing I like with your mock is you gave reasons why the trade was being made.
One thing I like with your mock is you gave reasons why the trade was being made.
Apr 16, 2012 at 10:37 AM
- fan49
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,293
i could be wrong but stephan hill had the fastest 40 time
Apr 16, 2012 at 10:38 AM
- fan49
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,293
http://blog.sfgate.com/49ers/2012/02/26/wr-hills-40-yard-dash-time-more-unique-than-his-love-of-blocking/
I was right hill ran 4.30... sorry bud
I was right hill ran 4.30... sorry bud