What if the Rams get first pick | Page 5

Nov 1, 2011 at 9:13 AM

Jesu80ncleats
Veteran
Posts: 2,502

Trade it to the 49ers, and the Lambs pick up Michael Floyd.

Nov 1, 2011 at 12:33 PM

hondakillerzx
Veteran
Posts: 19,115

pretty sure they have a huge lead on the colts with that 1 victory. colts aint doin s**t this year but theyre gonna be good for another 20 years when they draft luck, unless he john elway/eli mannings them!!! lol

Dec 26, 2011 at 12:28 PM

#63

zillabeast
Veteran
Posts: 20,042

The 49ers should be awarded the Rams' first pick for beating them in Week 17.

Dec 26, 2011 at 2:21 PM

#64

CalNiner49
Veteran
Posts: 5,719

I do not want the lambs to get the first pick.

Dec 26, 2011 at 5:30 PM

#65

Kolohe
Hall of Fame
Posts: 60,178

I say they trade out and stay within the top 3 picks not losing sight of Blackmon. I could also seem them taking Matt Kalil too, Bradford could use the added protection, hes loss too much time to injury in his short career.

Dec 27, 2011 at 5:58 AM

#66

Cjez
Hall of Fame
Posts: 163,128

apparently there is NO way they take luck with what they spent on bradford. But I dont see why not? If they trade down to the #2 or #3 spot to take Blackmon, how much difference in salary is there? They can let Luck sit for a year or two then try to trade bradford who will be in his 4th year.

Dec 27, 2011 at 8:29 AM

#67

HarryPeterson
Veteran
Posts: 193

If Luck is still there its a no brainer, unfortunately the front office will screw this up too.

Dec 27, 2011 at 8:31 AM

#68

49ersalldaway126
Veteran
Posts: 14,549

theyre going to trade it

pick up matt kalli/johnathan martin or blackmon

Dec 27, 2011 at 11:02 AM

#69

communist
Veteran
Posts: 12,151

Originally posted by ChazBoner:
apparently there is NO way they take luck with what they spent on bradford. But I dont see why not? If they trade down to the #2 or #3 spot to take Blackmon, how much difference in salary is there? They can let Luck sit for a year or two then try to trade bradford who will be in his 4th year.

This franchise is at the bottom again BUT, in contrary to the Colts, it has their QB for the future...Given that Bradford won't be traded away (who the heck would take that huge contract???), it makes absolutely no sense to draft Luck in their position. They need help NOW....Trading back a little bit and getting o-line help or Blackmon makes muuuuuuuuuuuch more sense.

Dec 27, 2011 at 11:29 AM

#70

ads_2006
Veteran
Posts: 56,546

If Gruden and AJ Smith are there

they can draft luck and no one will complain

you can even cut bradford and absorb the cap it

Dec 27, 2011 at 11:30 AM

#71

footballxpaul
Veteran
Posts: 6,481

if they are smart they will trade it and get the kings ransom that comes with it

Dec 27, 2011 at 12:03 PM

#72

TheGoldDiggerrrr
Veteran
Posts: 5,073

Originally posted by ads_2006:
If Gruden and AJ Smith are there

they can draft luck and no one will complain

you can even cut bradford and absorb the cap it

I thought they were looking at Jeff Fisher! Either way, i'll trade for bradford, he be like trading for steve young! lol

Dec 28, 2011 at 9:35 AM

#73

Ether
Veteran
Posts: 1,515

There's also that awkward moment when you realize...

Andrew Luck was coached by Jim Harbaugh. Not only coached, but built up by. Developed by. Jim Harbaugh has made Luck what he is right now. If Luck goes to St. Louis sure it'd be inconvenient if he ends up being a good QB, but I think Jim Harbaugh (and Vic Fangio) will know how to exploit his weaknesses.

Dec 28, 2011 at 9:47 AM

#74

lamontb
Veteran
Posts: 30,062

ship bradford's overrated ass to the skins and start with Luck. If not then trade that pick and improve your team

Dec 28, 2011 at 10:10 AM

#75

English
Moderator
Posts: 40,250

I have great confidence in the Rams ability to screw up the situation.