There are 397 users in the forums
MadDog's Final Wrap Up Grade for Niners
May 1, 2011 at 6:54 PM
- YungAce
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,919
i can't handle the truth
May 1, 2011 at 6:56 PM
- chico49erfan
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,961
I too agree that this draft is far from a present-day upgrade. It's a draft that may pay off in a few years.. which is something our team has no room for. We need immediate impact players (Kendall Hunter may be one).
So, I think we could've made better picks, but Colin K is the same Josh Johnson mold that Harbaugh loves and is good with. It's that same QB style.
I like the Bruce Miller pick -- I think he is going to be Jim's new Owen Maricec. Or the attempt to.
The way this draft went smelled a lot like Jim Harbaugh. I don't know if he went with a mentality of "this is what worked at Stanford" but it seems like the same type of "recruiting." Either way I trust his judgement and hope it pays off in large dividends.
[ Edited by chico49erfan on May 1, 2011 at 18:58:28 ]
So, I think we could've made better picks, but Colin K is the same Josh Johnson mold that Harbaugh loves and is good with. It's that same QB style.
I like the Bruce Miller pick -- I think he is going to be Jim's new Owen Maricec. Or the attempt to.
The way this draft went smelled a lot like Jim Harbaugh. I don't know if he went with a mentality of "this is what worked at Stanford" but it seems like the same type of "recruiting." Either way I trust his judgement and hope it pays off in large dividends.
[ Edited by chico49erfan on May 1, 2011 at 18:58:28 ]
May 1, 2011 at 7:01 PM
- drake49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 975
Barrows did report Bruce Miller will get practice reps on D. Not like it matters much though. At the minimum, He will be a solid special teams player.
May 1, 2011 at 7:01 PM
- Tman
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,770
May 1, 2011 at 7:03 PM
- AllTimeGreat
- Veteran
- Posts: 19,094
I trust Jim Harbaugh's evaluation so I have no problem passing on Gabbert and Dalton.
We need a pass-rusher really badly. I'm sorry but this draft was really lacking in pass rushers outside of the first round imo. I really don't see how the value was bad enough to warrant that low of a grade. I know that you love Gabbert but again, I have to trust Harbaugh with this.
I think you're being way too harsh on our later round draft picks.
I really think you're trying really hard to be different here.
We need a pass-rusher really badly. I'm sorry but this draft was really lacking in pass rushers outside of the first round imo. I really don't see how the value was bad enough to warrant that low of a grade. I know that you love Gabbert but again, I have to trust Harbaugh with this.
I think you're being way too harsh on our later round draft picks.
I really think you're trying really hard to be different here.
May 1, 2011 at 7:09 PM
- HessianDud
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,995
the Niners brass is happy with the draft, so I am too--until (if) they prove their incompetence.
I think we all agree that the current coaching staff is the best we've had for awhile and that, though our GM is inexperienced at that particular position, there is a ton of football knowledge there. So I'll concede to their opinion for now, especially since grading drafts takes several years to be truly accurate.
That said, i think giving the Niners a harsh grade is fair (since grading a draft the day after is inherently "unfair"). This was an incredibly strange draft for a number of reasons, and we seemed to deviate from the accepted knowledge/rankings of players and even seemed to stray from our own pressing needs. I think a C is a perfect grade for now, until we see these guys actually play.
I think we all agree that the current coaching staff is the best we've had for awhile and that, though our GM is inexperienced at that particular position, there is a ton of football knowledge there. So I'll concede to their opinion for now, especially since grading drafts takes several years to be truly accurate.
That said, i think giving the Niners a harsh grade is fair (since grading a draft the day after is inherently "unfair"). This was an incredibly strange draft for a number of reasons, and we seemed to deviate from the accepted knowledge/rankings of players and even seemed to stray from our own pressing needs. I think a C is a perfect grade for now, until we see these guys actually play.
May 1, 2011 at 7:10 PM
- D-Money
- Veteran
- Posts: 429
Honestly it sounds like your being a hater cause they didn't pick your guys. Again, they hit every need except NT. They got guys they wanted, "Gold Star 49ers". Would like to compare this draft to the Alex SMith draft and over time see which one measures out better. But C'mon Gabbert has the look but not the touch man. He will be a bust.
May 1, 2011 at 7:17 PM
- jreff22
- Veteran
- Posts: 67,311
As for Smith, he is a good straight ahead rush backer. At the same time, he is not an elite athlete, which is what you want from a guy this high on the board.
How did Manny do during the combine?
How did Manny do during the combine?
May 1, 2011 at 7:19 PM
- communist
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,475
we missed gabbert??? do u really think this? i dont...i do think that harbaugh didnt want him.
as for aldon:
so, we didnt want gabbert and prince and quinn hasnt any experience in two-point stance...additionally, no one wanted to trade up. what should we do? waiting til the time is up?
as for aldon:
so, we didnt want gabbert and prince and quinn hasnt any experience in two-point stance...additionally, no one wanted to trade up. what should we do? waiting til the time is up?
May 1, 2011 at 7:20 PM
- 49ersalldaway126
- Veteran
- Posts: 14,549
Originally posted by communist:
we missed gabbert??? do u really think this? i dont...i do think that harbaugh didnt want him.
as for aldon:
so, we didnt want gabbert and prince and quinn hasnt any experience in two-point stance...additionally, no one wanted to trade up. what should we do? waiting til the time is up?
i think we liked prince however i remember when we hired vic he continously said he wanted pass rushers
May 1, 2011 at 7:29 PM
- MadDog49er
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 19,400
Originally posted by AmpLee:
That's what happens when you pin yourself to your own prognostications. You inevitably get different results than the experts who actually made the picks and had the resources to study the players. I look forward to bumping this thread in two years with a big giant black crow, but you'll probably just revise history as usual.
I will the first to admit when I am wrong, but thanks for your kind words.
Please go ahead and bump my thoughts on the 2008 Niners' draft, where I thoroughly thrashed the team for the Balmer-Rachal-Smith-Wallace combo. You can bump that puppy all you want.
The "experts" were pretty hot that year.
You can also bump my criticism that Mays was the worst selection in 2010.
May 1, 2011 at 7:32 PM
- KID9R
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,131
I agree with you (first time ever) with the grades. exept for Aldon I'd give a B-. A lot of sheep around here will be up in arms though.
I just love how In years past we get the "name" players at a later round then expected and its all "we got a steal here, we nailed the draft, look at the grades we got here and here".
But the second that its the other way around it's "well I trust the coach, or you guys didn't put in the work the FO did."
This is how the day after grades work, perceived value. They mean nothing. But people around here can't even admit that we should get a bad "day after grade". That doesn't mean it will be a bad draft.
The good thing about reaching at nearly every pick is that at least we now they probably got most of the guys they wanted.
I just love how In years past we get the "name" players at a later round then expected and its all "we got a steal here, we nailed the draft, look at the grades we got here and here".
But the second that its the other way around it's "well I trust the coach, or you guys didn't put in the work the FO did."
This is how the day after grades work, perceived value. They mean nothing. But people around here can't even admit that we should get a bad "day after grade". That doesn't mean it will be a bad draft.
The good thing about reaching at nearly every pick is that at least we now they probably got most of the guys they wanted.
May 1, 2011 at 7:40 PM
- Gore_21
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,685
Thanks for the writeup MadDog and thanks for chatting it up with us. Grades might seem some what harsh but I think they took guys with potential and great guys off the field that they think will fit their scheme. Just not full of big name guys and great value. Time will tell but hopefully the coaching staff will get the most out of these guys. Like I mentioned in other posts nobody is going to care if we reached for guys like Culliver or even Kilgore if they become solid players. If it makes people feel better pretend we took Culliver in the 4th and Hunter in the 3rd. 
P.S. Hope we keep Miller at DE/OLB but they did say they aren't ruling out that he could play that. Just said he would have to earn it.
[ Edited by Gore_21 on May 1, 2011 at 19:42:43 ]

P.S. Hope we keep Miller at DE/OLB but they did say they aren't ruling out that he could play that. Just said he would have to earn it.
[ Edited by Gore_21 on May 1, 2011 at 19:42:43 ]
May 1, 2011 at 7:42 PM
- D-Money
- Veteran
- Posts: 429
Originally posted by jreff22:
As for Smith, he is a good straight ahead rush backer. At the same time, he is not an elite athlete, which is what you want from a guy this high on the board.
How did Manny do during the combine?
Aldon Smith is by far one of the best athletes from this class. just have to find out how good of a football player he is?
