very disappointing draft...

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Travisty13:

Originally posted by blizzuntz:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Travisty13:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Travisty13:
Didn't Read, Lol

So your answer is yes, then?

Not anymore. You changed my mind. Its a No.

Yeah I think me changing your mind just changed my mind. I'm switching to no.

im confused

http://www.49erswebzone.com/forum/thread.php?num=154362

The answers in there. But be careful, what you may learn, may scar you for life.

Oh man, I really appreciate this. Needed a good laugh tonight

I lol'd

Originally posted by cozz4:
smith would have went to dallas???? no chance dallas was looking at smith...they have a pass rusher...his name is DEMARCUS WARE!!!!!

Washington took Kerrigan and they have Orakpo!

Detroit took Fairley and they have Suh!

Originally posted by Solace49:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Travisty13:

Originally posted by blizzuntz:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Travisty13:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Travisty13:
Didn't Read, Lol

So your answer is yes, then?

Not anymore. You changed my mind. Its a No.

Yeah I think me changing your mind just changed my mind. I'm switching to no.

im confused

http://www.49erswebzone.com/forum/thread.php?num=154362

The answers in there. But be careful, what you may learn, may scar you for life.

Oh man, I really appreciate this. Needed a good laugh tonight

I lol'd

that little kid puking is great

Originally posted by Nalo9er:

Originally posted by cozz4:
smith would have went to dallas???? no chance dallas was looking at smith...they have a pass rusher...his name is DEMARCUS WARE!!!!!

Washington took Kerrigan and they have Orakpo!

Detroit took Fairley and they have Suh!

apparently having 2 sack artists on one team is bad

Originally posted by blizzuntz:

Originally posted by Solace49:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Travisty13:

Originally posted by blizzuntz:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Travisty13:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Travisty13:
Didn't Read, Lol

So your answer is yes, then?

Not anymore. You changed my mind. Its a No.

Yeah I think me changing your mind just changed my mind. I'm switching to no.

im confused

http://www.49erswebzone.com/forum/thread.php?num=154362

The answers in there. But be careful, what you may learn, may scar you for life.

Oh man, I really appreciate this. Needed a good laugh tonight

I lol'd

that little kid puking is great

Yeah. It sums up the thread perfectly, IMO

eh im pretty excited about it. But I was worried that we were gonna trade Aldon for Kolb

Originally posted by Travisty13:

Originally posted by blizzuntz:

Originally posted by Solace49:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Travisty13:

Originally posted by blizzuntz:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Travisty13:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by Travisty13:
Didn't Read, Lol

So your answer is yes, then?

Not anymore. You changed my mind. Its a No.

Yeah I think me changing your mind just changed my mind. I'm switching to no.

im confused

http://www.49erswebzone.com/forum/thread.php?num=154362

The answers in there. But be careful, what you may learn, may scar you for life.

Oh man, I really appreciate this. Needed a good laugh tonight

I lol'd

that little kid puking is great

Yeah. It sums up the thread perfectly, IMO

Spot on. But then how do you sum up the "how long does harbaugh have" thread?

Way too many overreactions today, everyone take a deep breath, we don't know more than these coaches. Super Bowls don't grow on trees, it takes a long time and a lot of work and luck to win one.

LMAO.

I swear, I wonder why some of the guys on this board aren't NFL GMs or scouts or coaches. Obviously, they know more than the f**king professionals.

Ok, let me start of with Aldon Smith- The only worthy players at 7 IMO were Quinn, Prince, Gabbert, and then Smith, for some. Most of us didn't want Gabbert, and most of us figured Harbaugh didn't either. Cross him off. I'll admit, I thought Prince was the pick too, but certainly, it wasn't just us, since he fell A LOT down all the way to the Giants.. Cross him off, for now. So Quinn and Smith are left, and both play the same position. I woulda thought Quinn was the pick, but if the Niners wanted Smith, then why should we argue? Just because some so called analyst who has never drafted a player in his lifetime thought otherwise? Bill Parcells was high on Smith.

Now for the 'why didn't we trade back' argument... IT TAKES TWO f**kING TEAMS TO MAKE A TRADE. Baalke even admitted that he tried trading back to the 11-13 range, where there were certain teams ( Houston ), who wanted Smith. The other teams didn't want to, so thats that. As much as some posters on here would like to believe so, you can't exactly force a team to make a trade with you..

Originally posted by cozz4:
aldon smith at #7 was a major reach...if hes the guy you want, they should have traded back a few spots and then taken him there...and chris culliver in round 3??? the guy got a 6th round grade!!! very disappointing

for all the reach comments. Just another analyst who knows a bit more than you or i but of course the czar on this webzone such as you knows it allll. OUr 6th round db was ranked in the top 100 in his 4th revision. check the bottom of the page. Not everyone is with you or mayoc.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d81f68f10/article/defensive-linemen-dominate-final-hot-100-before-draft

Originally posted by cozz4:
aldon smith at #7 was a major reach...if hes the guy you want, they should have traded back a few spots and then taken him there...and chris culliver in round 3??? the guy got a 6th round grade!!! very disappointing

Agree. I don't think Trent B. understands the concept of trading back- only trading up (see 2nd Rd). In 2010, TB reached and traded away picks to move up and draft a 'project' in Anthony Davis. If SF was competing against the Raiders to pick CK, then that is a bad indication for 49er fans.

My gut tells me that SF would have been better not drafting AD and picks in 2010 and taking Tyron Smith this year - and giving up nothing.

[ Edited by skylynx05 on Apr 29, 2011 at 22:40:49 ]

Originally posted by niner4life21:
LMAO.

I swear, I wonder why some of the guys on this board aren't NFL GMs or scouts or coaches. Obviously, they know more than the f**king professionals.

Ok, let me start of with Aldon Smith- The only worthy players at 7 IMO were Quinn, Prince, Gabbert, and then Smith, for some. Most of us didn't want Gabbert, and most of us figured Harbaugh didn't either. Cross him off. I'll admit, I thought Prince was the pick too, but certainly, it wasn't just us, since he fell A LOT down all the way to the Giants.. Cross him off, for now. So Quinn and Smith are left, and both play the same position. I woulda thought Quinn was the pick, but if the Niners wanted Smith, then why should we argue? Just because some so called analyst who has never drafted a player in his lifetime thought otherwise? Bill Parcells was high on Smith.

Now for the 'why didn't we trade back' argument... IT TAKES TWO f**kING TEAMS TO MAKE A TRADE. Baalke even admitted that he tried trading back to the 11-13 range, where there were certain teams ( Houston ), who wanted Smith. The other teams didn't want to, so thats that. As much as some posters on here would like to believe so, you can't exactly force a team to make a trade with you..

Originally posted by skylynx05:

Originally posted by cozz4:
aldon smith at #7 was a major reach...if hes the guy you want, they should have traded back a few spots and then taken him there...and chris culliver in round 3??? the guy got a 6th round grade!!! very disappointing

Agree. I don't think Trent B. understands the concept of trading back- only trading up (see 2nd Rd). In 2010, TB reached and traded away picks to move up and draft a 'project' in Anthony Davis. If SF was competing against the Raiders to pick CK, then that is a bad indication for 49er fans.

My gut tells me that SF would have been better not drafting AD and picks in 2010 and taking Tyron Smith this year - and giving up nothing.

What don't you understand about, Baalke tried to trade back. There was no viable options. So he stayed put and picked the guy he was going for in the 1st place? Dallas wanted him, Houston wanted him, NE wanted him. It's not a reach if you get a great player anywhere in the draft.

[ Edited by Travisty13 on Apr 29, 2011 at 22:42:41 ]

Originally posted by skylynx05:

Originally posted by cozz4:
aldon smith at #7 was a major reach...if hes the guy you want, they should have traded back a few spots and then taken him there...and chris culliver in round 3??? the guy got a 6th round grade!!! very disappointing

Agree. I don't think Trent B. understands the concept of trading back- only trading up (see 2nd Rd). In 2010, TB reached and traded away picks to move up and draft a 'project' in Anthony Davis. If SF was competing against the Raiders to pick CK, then that is a bad indication for 49er fans.

My gut tells me that SF would have been better not drafting AD and picks in 2010 and taking Tyron Smith this year - and giving up nothing.

Your gut? Or your 20/20 hindsight? Come on man.

Originally posted by niner4life21:
LMAO.

I swear, I wonder why some of the guys on this board aren't NFL GMs or scouts or coaches. Obviously, they know more than the f**king professionals.

Ok, let me start of with Aldon Smith- The only worthy players at 7 IMO were Quinn, Prince, Gabbert, and then Smith, for some. Most of us didn't want Gabbert, and most of us figured Harbaugh didn't either. Cross him off. I'll admit, I thought Prince was the pick too, but certainly, it wasn't just us, since he fell A LOT down all the way to the Giants.. Cross him off, for now. So Quinn and Smith are left, and both play the same position. I woulda thought Quinn was the pick, but if the Niners wanted Smith, then why should we argue? Just because some so called analyst who has never drafted a player in his lifetime thought otherwise? Bill Parcells was high on Smith.

Now for the 'why didn't we trade back' argument... IT TAKES TWO f**kING TEAMS TO MAKE A TRADE. Baalke even admitted that he tried trading back to the 11-13 range, where there were certain teams ( Houston ), who wanted Smith. The other teams didn't want to, so thats that. As much as some posters on here would like to believe so, you can't exactly force a team to make a trade with you..

Cleveland were lucky mofos, I would have loved that trade for us...but f**king A, anyone thinking Aldon Smith was a reach was just not paying attention. He was rated as the 3rd best pass-rusher in 3-4 or 4-3 on most people's position rankings, he was expected to go to Texans...! So, Baalke and Harbaugh liked the no.3 DE/OLB more than the no.2 DE/OLB - big f**king deal.

Originally posted by cozz4:
smith would have went to dallas???? no chance dallas was looking at smith...they have a pass rusher...his name is DEMARCUS WARE!!!!!

you are so right,,, no team wants more than one pass rusher, that would be stupid.