There are 1,151 users in the forums
Sando's Mock Draft (4/15)
- 1 2
Apr 16, 2010 at 7:32 AM
- FredFlintstone
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,741
love that 1st rd
Apr 16, 2010 at 7:34 AM
- nickbradley
- Member
- Posts: 3,755
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
love that 1st rd
Not a Spiller-phile myself..
Apr 16, 2010 at 7:36 AM
- valrod33
- Hall of Small
- Posts: 138,122
Im really starting to believe that the Niners are gonna draft Cj Spiller
Apr 16, 2010 at 7:39 AM
- FredFlintstone
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,741
Originally posted by nickbradley:Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
love that 1st rd
Not a Spiller-phile myself..
you would be after the 1st gm. we get our our tackle and adding spiller would make our offense so much more dangerous. how can anyone not want an offense of an improving smith, vd, crabtree, gore and spiller with our oline making a huge improvement adding davis
Apr 16, 2010 at 7:41 AM
- LA_NINERS
- Info N/A
I love the 1st round.
Then in the 2nd round grab Patrick Robinson!!!
Then in the 2nd round grab Patrick Robinson!!!
Apr 16, 2010 at 7:41 AM
- Nuns
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,301
A Spiller/Davis combo is looking better and better every day. Some have Davis ranked higher than Okung.
Apr 16, 2010 at 7:46 AM
- nickbradley
- Member
- Posts: 3,755
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:Originally posted by nickbradley:Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
love that 1st rd
Not a Spiller-phile myself..
you would be after the 1st gm. we get our our tackle and adding spiller would make our offense so much more dangerous. how can anyone not want an offense of an improving smith, vd, crabtree, gore and spiller with our oline making a huge improvement adding davis
Dez > Spiller
Why is Spiller so valuable if he's only gonna get 5 - 7 carries a game, a couple catches, and return kicks? From my understanding, he's not a great punt returner...Dez Bryant is actually a better PR. I've also heard people say that they don't necesarily think that CJ Spiller is any better than Jahvid Best -- injury concerns make Spiller better (but they say Best is a better pure runner).
Better off with Davis at RT, Crabtree and Dez at wideout, Morgan in the slot, Davis at TE, and Gore pounding the rock. We may be able to make a move for Best in the 2nd as well.
Apr 16, 2010 at 7:47 AM
- nickbradley
- Member
- Posts: 3,755
Originally posted by Nuns:
A Spiller/Davis combo is looking better and better every day. Some have Davis ranked higher than Okung.
I know; I thick Singletary is very high on Davis, is not concerned about his character issues, and will take him if he has the chance...probably at 13.
Apr 16, 2010 at 7:48 AM
- lamontb
- Veteran
- Posts: 33,578
I can see the skins taking Williams over Okung b/c he's more agile and fits Shanahan's blocking scheme better. No way can i see Bulaga being drafted over him though. I wouldn't mind that combo at all I don't think Davis is gonna fall though
Apr 16, 2010 at 7:49 AM
- FredFlintstone
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,741
Originally posted by nickbradley:Originally posted by FredFlintstone:Originally posted by nickbradley:Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
love that 1st rd
Not a Spiller-phile myself..
you would be after the 1st gm. we get our our tackle and adding spiller would make our offense so much more dangerous. how can anyone not want an offense of an improving smith, vd, crabtree, gore and spiller with our oline making a huge improvement adding davis
Dez > Spiller
Why is Spiller so valuable if he's only gonna get 5 - 7 carries a game, a couple catches, and return kicks? From my understanding, he's not a great punt returner...Dez Bryant is actually a better PR. I've also heard people say that they don't necesarily think that CJ Spiller is any better than Jahvid Best -- injury concerns make Spiller better (but they say Best is a better pure runner).
Better off with Davis at RT, Crabtree and Dez at wideout, Morgan in the slot, Davis at TE, and Gore pounding the rock. We may be able to make a move for Best in the 2nd as well.
the thing is no way we take bryant. only offensive weapon we'll take is spiller
Apr 16, 2010 at 7:51 AM
- nickbradley
- Member
- Posts: 3,755
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:Originally posted by nickbradley:Originally posted by FredFlintstone:Originally posted by nickbradley:Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
love that 1st rd
Not a Spiller-phile myself..
you would be after the 1st gm. we get our our tackle and adding spiller would make our offense so much more dangerous. how can anyone not want an offense of an improving smith, vd, crabtree, gore and spiller with our oline making a huge improvement adding davis
Dez > Spiller
Why is Spiller so valuable if he's only gonna get 5 - 7 carries a game, a couple catches, and return kicks? From my understanding, he's not a great punt returner...Dez Bryant is actually a better PR. I've also heard people say that they don't necesarily think that CJ Spiller is any better than Jahvid Best -- injury concerns make Spiller better (but they say Best is a better pure runner).
Better off with Davis at RT, Crabtree and Dez at wideout, Morgan in the slot, Davis at TE, and Gore pounding the rock. We may be able to make a move for Best in the 2nd as well.
the thing is no way we take bryant. only offensive weapon we'll take is spiller
Why? Any proof? PR is a bigger need than KR, and Dez is a better PR than CJ. Also, the 49ers have stated that Dez's character concerns are not an issue, and Sing and Baalke have both attended his workout and brought him in for a tryout. Has CJ Spiller visited the 49ers?
Apr 16, 2010 at 7:56 AM
- FredFlintstone
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,741
Originally posted by nickbradley:Originally posted by FredFlintstone:Originally posted by nickbradley:Originally posted by FredFlintstone:Originally posted by nickbradley:Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
love that 1st rd
Not a Spiller-phile myself..
you would be after the 1st gm. we get our our tackle and adding spiller would make our offense so much more dangerous. how can anyone not want an offense of an improving smith, vd, crabtree, gore and spiller with our oline making a huge improvement adding davis
Dez > Spiller
Why is Spiller so valuable if he's only gonna get 5 - 7 carries a game, a couple catches, and return kicks? From my understanding, he's not a great punt returner...Dez Bryant is actually a better PR. I've also heard people say that they don't necesarily think that CJ Spiller is any better than Jahvid Best -- injury concerns make Spiller better (but they say Best is a better pure runner).
Better off with Davis at RT, Crabtree and Dez at wideout, Morgan in the slot, Davis at TE, and Gore pounding the rock. We may be able to make a move for Best in the 2nd as well.
the thing is no way we take bryant. only offensive weapon we'll take is spiller
Why? Any proof? PR is a bigger need than KR, and Dez is a better PR than CJ. Also, the 49ers have stated that Dez's character concerns are not an issue, and Sing and Baalke have both attended his workout and brought him in for a tryout. Has CJ Spiller visited the 49ers?
visiting a team doesnt mean you'll get drafted by them, it all can be a smokescreen to get some team to fall in love with bryant and worry about us drafting him that they'll give up more to trade up. i dont see us as a team paying 2 wrs a whole bunch of money when we still got willis and vd up for pretty big pay days. dont get me wrong i wouldnt be upset with bryant but i just know that we wont spend big money on 2 wrs when we can go oline and best defensive player in the 1st. i still think spiller is our top playmaker on our board
Apr 16, 2010 at 8:13 AM
- CorvaNinerFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,448
IF the Browns actually trade up to get Bradford as is being talked about, it could change the dynamics of the top 10. Nothing against Spiller, but if we have a shot at Haden, I think he'd be the better pick. He could understudy Clements this coming season and take over in 2011 or even sometime this year, who knows. OT and CB are greatest value for us...so I hope we go in that direction. Or, we could get Davis and Iupati and be done with the OL upgrade early. Very good CB's will be available in 2nd rd.
Apr 16, 2010 at 8:17 AM
- nickbradley
- Member
- Posts: 3,755
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:Originally posted by nickbradley:Originally posted by FredFlintstone:Originally posted by nickbradley:Originally posted by FredFlintstone:Originally posted by nickbradley:Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
love that 1st rd
Not a Spiller-phile myself..
you would be after the 1st gm. we get our our tackle and adding spiller would make our offense so much more dangerous. how can anyone not want an offense of an improving smith, vd, crabtree, gore and spiller with our oline making a huge improvement adding davis
Dez > Spiller
Why is Spiller so valuable if he's only gonna get 5 - 7 carries a game, a couple catches, and return kicks? From my understanding, he's not a great punt returner...Dez Bryant is actually a better PR. I've also heard people say that they don't necesarily think that CJ Spiller is any better than Jahvid Best -- injury concerns make Spiller better (but they say Best is a better pure runner).
Better off with Davis at RT, Crabtree and Dez at wideout, Morgan in the slot, Davis at TE, and Gore pounding the rock. We may be able to make a move for Best in the 2nd as well.
the thing is no way we take bryant. only offensive weapon we'll take is spiller
Why? Any proof? PR is a bigger need than KR, and Dez is a better PR than CJ. Also, the 49ers have stated that Dez's character concerns are not an issue, and Sing and Baalke have both attended his workout and brought him in for a tryout. Has CJ Spiller visited the 49ers?
visiting a team doesnt mean you'll get drafted by them, it all can be a smokescreen to get some team to fall in love with bryant and worry about us drafting him that they'll give up more to trade up. i dont see us as a team paying 2 wrs a whole bunch of money when we still got willis and vd up for pretty big pay days. dont get me wrong i wouldnt be upset with bryant but i just know that we wont spend big money on 2 wrs when we can go oline and best defensive player in the 1st. i still think spiller is our top playmaker on our board
So we should spend big $$$ on 2 RBs instead? I don't understand the logic behind that one.
- 1 2