There are 256 users in the forums
1st round mock with trade
Jan 20, 2010 at 10:31 AM
- LasVegasWally
- Veteran
- Posts: 24,264
One thing for sure - he'd get lots and lots of playing time since our Oline will suck once again and 3 & outs will be in abundance.
Jan 21, 2010 at 10:20 PM
- 49ersBest1
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,958
Originally posted by TheNinersMan:Originally posted by TheNinersMan:
Niners trade 13 and 17 for Tampa's 3rd
1 - STL: Suh, Ndamukong - DT - Nebraska
2 - DET: Okung, Russell - T - Oklahoma St.
3 - SF: Berry, Eric - FS - Tennessee
4 - WAS: Bradford, Sam - QB - Oklahoma
5 - KC: McCoy, Gerald - DT - Oklahoma
6 - SEA: Clausen, Jimmy - QB - Notre Dame
7 - CLE: Campbell, Bruce - OT - Maryland
8 - OAK: Pierre-Paul, Jason - DE - South Florida
9 - BUF: Haden, Joe - CB - Florida
10 - JAX: Tebow, Tim - QB - Florida
11 - DEN: Mcclain, Rolando - ILB - Alabama
12 - MIA: Morgan, Derrick - DE - Georgia Tech
13 - TB: Davis, Anthony - T - Rutgers
14 - SEA: Mays, Taylor - FS - USC
15 - NYG: Price, Brian - DT - UCLA
16 - TEN: Griffen, Everson - DE - USC
17 - TB: Cody, Terrence - DT - Alabama
18 - PIT: Thomas, Earl - SS - Texas
19 - ATL: Dowling, Ras-i - FS - Virginia
20 - HOU: Bryant, Dez - WR - Oklahoma St.
21 - CIN: Gresham, Jermaine - TE - Oklahoma
22 - NE: Spiller, C.J. - RB - Clemson
23 - GB: Bulaga, Bryan - T - Iowa
24 - PHI: Dunlap, Carlos - DE - Florida
25 - NYJ: Brown, Charles - T - USC
26 - BAL: Shipley, Jordan - WR - Texas
27 - ARI: Warren, Donovan - CB - Michigan
28 - DAL: Hughes, Jerry - DE - TCU
29 - MIN: Iupati, Mike - OG - Idaho
30 - IND: Williams, Dan - DT - Tennessee
31 - SD: Benn, Arrelious - WR - Illinois
32 - NO: Weatherspoon, Sean - OLB - Missouri
1 - STL: Ndamukong Suh - DT - Neb
2 - DET: Gerald McCoy - DT - OU
3 - TB: Erick Berry - S - TENN
4 - WAS: Sam Bradford - QB - OU
5 - KC: Russel Okung - OT - OSU
6 - SEA: Jimmy Clausen - QB - ND
7 - CLE: Derrick Morgan - DE - GT
8 - OAK: Carlos Dunlap - DE - FLA
9 - BUF: Dez Bryant - WR - OSU
10- Jax: Joe Haden - CB - FLA
11- DEN: Rolando McClain - ILB - ALA
12- MIA: Jerry Hughes - OLB - TCU
13- SF: Bruce Campbell - OT - Maryland
14- SEA: CJ Spiller - RB - Clemson
15- NYG: Brian Price - DT - UCLA
16- TEN: Everson Griffen - DE - USC
17- SF: Mike Iupati - OG - Idaho
18- PIT: Earl Thomas - S - Texas
19- ATL: Donovan Warren - CB - Mich
20- HOU: Dan Williams - DT - Tenn
21- CIN: Taylor Mays - S - USC
22- NE: Jason Pierre-Paul - DE - USF
23- GB: Brian Bulaga - OT - Iowa
24- PHI: Greg Romeus - DE - Pitt
25- SD: Charles Brown - OT - USC
26- BAL: Golden Tate - WR - ND
27- ARI: Trent Williams - OT - OU
28- DAL: Damian WIlliams - WR - USC
29- MIN: Terrence Cody - DT - ALA
30- NYJ: Jason Fox - OT - MIA
31- NO: Sean Witherspoon - OLB - Missouri
32- IND: Jeremy Beal - DE - OU
Better?
Yeah, better. You still fail though. They won't take a guard in the first round. The first pick isn't bad, but the second should be the best player available. I'd go pass-rush if the right pick is there.
Jan 21, 2010 at 10:22 PM
- GEEK
- Veteran
- Posts: 19,193
i like boobies.
Jan 22, 2010 at 7:54 AM
- LasVegasWally
- Veteran
- Posts: 24,264
You forgot to play the "Twilight Zone" music before the post.
Jan 22, 2010 at 8:04 AM
- English
- Moderator
- Posts: 40,223
Originally posted by GEEK:
i like boobies.
Useless without piccies !
Jan 22, 2010 at 8:12 AM
- tjd808185
- Veteran
- Posts: 26,006
I wouldn't be against trading up for Suh. Long term drafting Suh gives us a defense that's capable of putting up a dynasty.
That being said there's a million things going against this. 1. Suh won't be there at 3. 2. If he was there Tampa would take him in a heartbeat. 3. The cost of acquiring picks/money just isn't our best value.
[ Edited by tjd808185 on Jan 22, 2010 at 08:13:49 ]
That being said there's a million things going against this. 1. Suh won't be there at 3. 2. If he was there Tampa would take him in a heartbeat. 3. The cost of acquiring picks/money just isn't our best value.
[ Edited by tjd808185 on Jan 22, 2010 at 08:13:49 ]
Jan 22, 2010 at 8:20 AM
- valrod33
- Hall of Small
- Posts: 137,970
Originally posted by English:Originally posted by GEEK:
i like boobies.
Useless without piccies !
Jan 22, 2010 at 9:21 AM
- English
- Moderator
- Posts: 40,223
Originally posted by valrod33:Originally posted by English:Originally posted by GEEK:
i like boobies.
Useless without piccies !
OK you and I need to have a serious discussion about the sanctity of boobies!
Jan 22, 2010 at 9:25 AM
- GEEK
- Veteran
- Posts: 19,193
Originally posted by English:Originally posted by valrod33:Originally posted by English:Originally posted by GEEK:
i like boobies.
Useless without piccies !
OK you and I need to have a serious discussion about the sanctity of boobies!
WTF. Ban?
Jan 22, 2010 at 9:31 AM
- English
- Moderator
- Posts: 40,223
Originally posted by GEEK:Originally posted by English:Originally posted by valrod33:Originally posted by English:Originally posted by GEEK:
i like boobies.
Useless without piccies !
OK you and I need to have a serious discussion about the sanctity of boobies!
WTF. Ban?
Fair enough!