There are 371 users in the forums

Kriz 3.0

krizay · 2025-04-04T15:00:56-07:00

I personally would love to trade down a time or two but history shows JL only seems to move down 1 spot when he trades down so I didn't do any trades to make it more realistic. 11 Walter Nolen DT Ole Miss 43 Tyleik Williams DT Ohio st 75 Elijah Arroyo TE Miami 100 Charles Grant OT W & M 113 Ashton Gillotte DE Louisville 138 Luke Kandra LG Cincinnati 147 Cody Simon LB Ohio st 160 Jordan Hancock NB/FS Ohio st 230 Carson Vinson OT Alabama A & M 249 Lan Larison RB UC Davis 252 Roc Taylor TE Memphis DL Bosa, Nolan, Williams, Gillotte our DL Is set. Especially against the run. Would have been Nice to keep Floyd for obvious Passing downs but Gillotte should suffice. OL Grant has potential to eventually take over for TW but should be able to replace CM in 26. In25 he serves as a swing tackle. Vinson would serve the role as swing tackle starting in 26. With Kandra competing for the LG job this year. I did not address the center position. Between Nugent and Hennessey would like to see if one of them step up. If not can address C in next year's draft. I just love Cody Simon's game. This was his 1st year starting and he didn't disappoint. Would've also been OK with Teddye Buchanan here. Jordan Hancock is the only secondary guy I chose. CB and Safety would have been the spots I addressed had I traded down like i want us too. As for Hancock, he can play the slot or FS. Adds Versatility while possibly fighting for a starting spot at one of those 2 positions. On the offensive side let's keep our QB comfortable. By that I mean, people say he did what he did because of the talent around him. Well keep putting talent around him. I thought when scouting WRs last year Pearsall had a similar skill set to BA. We obviously drafted him with the idea of replacing BA with him. Obviously BA isn't going anywhere but KS has a cheaper version of BA in Pearsall Arroyo can be a move piece in the mold of Kittle. Not saying he gets to Kittles level but it allows KS and Brock to continue their success even after George is gone. Given KS a cheaper version of GK in Arroyo. Roc Taylor his game reminds me alot of JJ. Scouting Reports suggest his blocking may be as well. Drafting Roc gives KS a cheaper version of JJ. Lan Larison I do t know much about this dude other than his video I posted in the RB thread. Dude's skillset reminds of CMC. Not saying he reaches that level but again would allow Kyle to call the game the same way as if CMC was in there. More importantly, it keeps Brock surrounded by playmakers (potentially speaking) with the same skill sets he's familiar with. Now if Cowing could take on some of that Deebo role.

Share this on Twitter Share this on Facebook Share this on Threads Share this on Tumblr Flip into Flipboard Share this on Reddit Share via SMS Share via Email

Apr 4, 2025 at 5:54 PM

Hoovtrain
Veteran
Posts: 34,707

Not bad

The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.

Apr 4, 2025 at 11:08 PM

Sask49erFan
Veteran
Posts: 1,924

I'd be ok with this. Hit all all our needs forsure

good job

Apr 7, 2025 at 5:50 PM

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 118,753

Realistic, I like it

Apr 7, 2025 at 7:59 PM

Vai5684
Veteran
Posts: 156

I like Nolan but you get him later in the first round. You can trade down below 20 and he will still be there. I like Williams draft to. We need a 330+ pound defensive table to stop the run . Nice draft

Analyst reveals 49ers' best undrafted free agent fit

Where the 49ers' 2026 NFL Draft class ranks, per CBS Sports

49ers' De'Zhaun Stribling named among rookies with Pro Bowl, All-Pro potential in 2026

Where does 49ers QB Brock Purdy rank among his peers? One writer lists him shockingly low!

Click here and check the box by our name!

Writers Wanted

This site is not endorsed, sponsored by, or affiliated with the San Francisco 49ers or NFL Enterprises LLC. “49ers” is a registered trademark of the Forty Niners Football Company LLC. All team and player names mentioned are registered trademarks of the NFL and their respective organizations. Any use of team names, trademarks, logos, or photos is strictly for descriptive purposes. Content and information sourced from other sites remain the property of their respective owners. Player and team photos are used with permission from USA TODAY Sports Images.