There are 700 users in the forums
The RB SHOCKER LB STOCKER Zeke Mock
Feb 25, 2018 at 4:40 PM
- tatdwolf49
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,206
To much doubling up(RB) and tripling up(LB) for me we have other needs then to draft 3 LBs in 4 rounds... Biggest change I'd make is a future LT at 60 or a pass rusher ...
Feb 25, 2018 at 4:59 PM
- krizay
- Veteran
- Posts: 26,617
1 too many trades. 2 trade ups both for a RB. Dont make sense.
If we trade up for muchel in this scenario as you said a 3 down RB. Then we could use our 2 3rds on a better edge rusher.... Duke Ejiofor or Kemeko turay and either a WR/TE.
Then instead of Carter you could down with a receiving RB in Jaylen Samuels to pair with Michel
Then could use one of your 2 late edges on a sam.
Dont mind taking 2 LBs but not 2 in the 1st 2 rounds. Unless we cut/trade foster. But if the scenario plays out as i stated then it wouldnt hurt as bad because of the extra pick we've made.
Evans
Michel
Leonard
Ragnow
Ejiofor
Fumagalli
Jaylen Samuels
J.C.Jackson
Wyatt Teller
Jaylen Holmes
SAM CANDIDATE
this i would be ok with
If we trade up for muchel in this scenario as you said a 3 down RB. Then we could use our 2 3rds on a better edge rusher.... Duke Ejiofor or Kemeko turay and either a WR/TE.
Then instead of Carter you could down with a receiving RB in Jaylen Samuels to pair with Michel
Then could use one of your 2 late edges on a sam.
Dont mind taking 2 LBs but not 2 in the 1st 2 rounds. Unless we cut/trade foster. But if the scenario plays out as i stated then it wouldnt hurt as bad because of the extra pick we've made.
Evans
Michel
Leonard
Ragnow
Ejiofor
Fumagalli
Jaylen Samuels
J.C.Jackson
Wyatt Teller
Jaylen Holmes
SAM CANDIDATE
this i would be ok with
Feb 25, 2018 at 5:04 PM
- m_brockalexander
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,379
Originally posted by tatdwolf49:To much doubling up(RB) and tripling up(LB) for me we have other needs then to draft 3 LBs in 4 rounds... Biggest change I'd make is a future LT at 60 or a pass rusher ...
Agree with the Wolf. Gotta spread the love a little on the roster. This team has very specific needs and one is speed at OLB. Don't see that anywhere here. Either Jones or Michel would do at RB but not both. Like the free agents but don't know if the Niners will invest any money at OT besides maybe re-signing Gilliam or just letting the kid from Utah be the backup OT (Williams Jr.) or Magmuson. Can't fix everything in one year.
Like the players you are targeting, just need less of them.
Feb 25, 2018 at 5:13 PM
- Waterbear
- Veteran
- Posts: 18,527
How do we have 3 second round picks in that trade I don't get it.
Feb 25, 2018 at 5:15 PM
- krizay
- Veteran
- Posts: 26,617
Originally posted by Waterbear:How do we have 3 second round picks in that trade I don't get it.
1 trade back and and 1 trade up plus our 2nd (well NO)
Feb 25, 2018 at 5:19 PM
- adrianlesnar
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,482
Quite the over reaction to our needs, but I get mocks are more fun when you can fit in all of your draft crushes.
We're gonna draft arguably RB2/3 and RB3/4, and have them split carries? That's already a waste of talent and draft capital, and you're proposing using 4 or 5 picks to do so.
As for LB, what happens if foster does come back? Waste of high draft capital to have someone sitting on the bench. I'd rather draft a MIKE (evans) and run with Malcolm Smith for a year. If Foster is a dud, take a guy next year.
I also doubt Vontae signs if not guarenteed a true shot to compete to be a starter, and I don't see the regime putting Ahkellos development on hiatus for an aging oft injured Davis
We're gonna draft arguably RB2/3 and RB3/4, and have them split carries? That's already a waste of talent and draft capital, and you're proposing using 4 or 5 picks to do so.
As for LB, what happens if foster does come back? Waste of high draft capital to have someone sitting on the bench. I'd rather draft a MIKE (evans) and run with Malcolm Smith for a year. If Foster is a dud, take a guy next year.
I also doubt Vontae signs if not guarenteed a true shot to compete to be a starter, and I don't see the regime putting Ahkellos development on hiatus for an aging oft injured Davis
Feb 25, 2018 at 6:31 PM
- davidboutte
- Veteran
- Posts: 923
Dumerville signed for 2 years last off season so we don't need to resign but I agree we'll need him this year. Like you said FA isn't likely to upgrade the position and unless Chubb is there at 9 I'm not sure we have a day 1 starter in this draft. Seems every late round guy keeps moving into 2nd round conversations too. Not sure they are worthy.
I'm a big fan of doubling up on a position of weakness and thus turning it to a strength. So kudos on RB and LB. Moncrief really does shape up the WR core. Although I believe their are several bigger WR worth drafting throughout the draft as well. Cobbs, Tate, Mims, Ateman. I could see a lot of your selected players going exactly in the range you did, so that's realistic. Wouldn't mind someone like MJ Steewart or Siran Neal to add depth to corner/Safety in later rounds if Jackson isn't available. Best of all we HAVE to take advantage of FA and at least come up with a starting corner and Gaurd. We have money and a few options. I see them grabbing a WR too, albeit a complimentary piece similar to Moncrief. So overall great job. Thx
I'm a big fan of doubling up on a position of weakness and thus turning it to a strength. So kudos on RB and LB. Moncrief really does shape up the WR core. Although I believe their are several bigger WR worth drafting throughout the draft as well. Cobbs, Tate, Mims, Ateman. I could see a lot of your selected players going exactly in the range you did, so that's realistic. Wouldn't mind someone like MJ Steewart or Siran Neal to add depth to corner/Safety in later rounds if Jackson isn't available. Best of all we HAVE to take advantage of FA and at least come up with a starting corner and Gaurd. We have money and a few options. I see them grabbing a WR too, albeit a complimentary piece similar to Moncrief. So overall great job. Thx