49ers vs. Cowboys Tickets Available! →

There are 849 users in the forums

2019 Free Agency & Trades Thread

Mar 12, 2019 at 11:58 AM
  • FL9er
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 10,889
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by VA9erfan:
Remember this just a few days ago??? WTH is going on???!!!


Lies 😑

You can acquire those through the draft you know? [See Baker Mayfield, Saquon, etc]
Mar 12, 2019 at 11:58 AM
  • VDSF
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 5,971
Originally posted by FL9er:
Plot twist. What if the Giants want the #2 pick because they want Bosa themselves, not a QB. Gettleman seems like the type of GM that devalues the QB position.

Discuss.

Nope.

This years 2nd and 3rd round pick plus next years 1st.

Can't say no to that.
Mar 12, 2019 at 11:58 AM
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by KittleSkittle:
OBJ has 2 more yards receiving than Goodwin over the last 2 seasons and we're talking about giving up the kind of haul that you only see when teams move way up for a FQB.

Teams regularly win without top WRs. Very hard to win without some form of pass rush. Not to mention 5 years of cheap team control on Bosa.

#2 is a no for me.

Why is everyone banking on Bosa at 2? This offseason will play out the same as all the rest. A couple of mid tier FA signings, lose out on the draft crush and end up with another D lineman.
Mar 12, 2019 at 11:58 AM
Probably looking at a corner, hope we're still think about Earl. Perfect fit and we have the money.
Mar 12, 2019 at 11:59 AM
  • okdkid
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,728
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
The more I think about it, the more giving up pick #36 and next year's 1st for OBJ makes sense. That's basically just a little less than what the Bears gave up for Khalil Mack.

Would include Thomas as well. We have depth across the DL.
Mar 12, 2019 at 11:59 AM
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
The more I think about it, the more giving up pick #36 and next year's 1st for OBJ makes sense. That's basically just a little less than what the Bears gave up for Khalil Mack.

Mack is a much more impactful player. Especially over the last 2 years.
Mar 12, 2019 at 11:59 AM
Originally posted by VDSF:
Originally posted by FL9er:
Plot twist. What if the Giants want the #2 pick because they want Bosa themselves, not a QB. Gettleman seems like the type of GM that devalues the QB position.

Discuss.

Nope.

This years 2nd and 3rd round pick plus next years 1st.

Can't say no to that.


Lol, uhhhhhhh hay-ell no.
Mar 12, 2019 at 11:59 AM
Originally posted by WINiner:
So damn glad you aren;t the GM. That's WAY too much.

If I was the GM I would have drafted him and we wouldn' be having this convo
Mar 12, 2019 at 12:00 PM
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by WINiner:
So damn glad you aren;t the GM. That's WAY too much.

If I was the GM I would have drafted him and we wouldn' be having this convo

BOOM!!!! Now that I can agree with
Mar 12, 2019 at 12:00 PM
Originally posted by NCommand:
There's always going to be outliers (which is why the first day of tampering and FA are pretty nuts and not wise to invest in annually). But even in your example, NY got a good productive player at a premier position and then traded him for a top 6 G based on team needs. But yeah...was not a fan of that Vernon move (another day 1 reset-the-market move).

The outliers are usually the success stories. The story most of the time is a guy gets signed with high hopes, fails to deliver, winds up as a cap casualty in two to three years. You're paying top of the market salaries often to players who are average at best or products of a system.

Once Brandon Graham was re-signed, there wasn't a single unrestricted edge rusher who was worth top of the market money. In a league with a huge demand for pass rush, teams aren't letting upper echelon guys just walk.
Mar 12, 2019 at 12:01 PM
Hope this OBJ situation comes to a resolution soon so don't risk missing out on other FA's that we can pay instead...

It was rumored Niners wanted to get this done one or the other by start of FA
Mar 12, 2019 at 12:01 PM
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by VA9erfan:
Remember this just a few days ago??? WTH is going on???!!!


Lies 😑

Mar 12, 2019 at 12:01 PM
Originally posted by KittleSkittle:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
The more I think about it, the more giving up pick #36 and next year's 1st for OBJ makes sense. That's basically just a little less than what the Bears gave up for Khalil Mack.

Mack is a much more impactful player. Especially over the last 2 years.

Which is why giving up just a little less than what the Bears gave up would make sense. I doubt the Giants take it though.
[ Edited by Fanaticofnfl on Mar 12, 2019 at 12:02 PM ]
Mar 12, 2019 at 12:02 PM
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by WINiner:
So damn glad you aren;t the GM. That's WAY too much.

If I was the GM I would have drafted him and we wouldn' be having this convo

We would still have to given up a lot to much up that far to grab him
Mar 12, 2019 at 12:03 PM
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by KittleSkittle:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
The more I think about it, the more giving up pick #36 and next year's 1st for OBJ makes sense. That's basically just a little less than what the Bears gave up for Khalil Mack.

Mack is a much more impactful player. Especially over the last 2 years.

Which is why giving up just a little less than what the Bears gave up would make sense. I doubt the Giants take it though.

For the Giants, sure. I don't think it would be the best move for us.
✕
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone