49ers vs. Raiders Tickets Available! →

There are 519 users in the forums

2018 NFL Free Agency News & Rumors Discussion Thread

We signed a punter!!!! What a way to start "pre" free agency!!!

"The 49ers on Monday signed former Vikings and Lions punter Jeff Locke to a one-year contract, potentially creating competition for incumbent punter Bradley Pinion"
Originally posted by GNS1310:

Makes sense.

Pass rusher...
Stanford connection...
[ Edited by a49erfan77 on Mar 12, 2018 at 2:59 PM ]
Originally posted by jreff22:
They have 2 1sts

Barkley at #1, trade with Buffalo (4th pick) and move back and get both of their 1sts. Cle walks with 3 1's.

Cleveland needs a franchise QB, not more picks. They have a ton already. You don't pass on having first choice in drafting a QB in favor of a RB in a RB loaded draft.
Originally posted by GNS1310:

Never heard of him
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by GNS1310:
Tent Murphy!

He literally included a 1/3 of the league in this rumor....lol

I'm hearing that if Leveon Bell wasn't franchised tagged 29 teams including the 49ers would have been interested.
Originally posted by VA9erfan:
We signed a punter!!!! What a way to start "pre" free agency!!!

"The 49ers on Monday signed former Vikings and Lions punter Jeff Locke to a one-year contract, potentially creating competition for incumbent punter Bradley Pinion"

Page 6, my dude.
  • jcs
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 39,849
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by GNS1310:
Tent Murphy!

He literally included a 1/3 of the league in this rumor....lol

I'm hearing that if Leveon Bell wasn't franchised tagged 29 teams including the 49ers would have been interested.
lol
Originally posted by JFG49ers:
"Agressively prudent"... more like... "Agressively dormant"

Little word play by lynch! Punter minus the D cause we got that already with Sherman. Johns playing Chess while the rest of these f**kers are playing twister
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by jreff22:
They have 2 1sts

Barkley at #1, trade with Buffalo (4th pick) and move back and get both of their 1sts. Cle walks with 3 1's.

Cleveland needs a franchise QB, not more picks. They have a ton already. You don't pass on having first choice in drafting a QB in favor of a RB in a RB loaded draft.

They wont pass on Barkley....especially with Tyrod just signed.
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by strickac:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by GNS1310:
Bills trade to #4
Browns must take QB #1
Saquon falls! (to the Giants at #2)

If they like mayfield they can wait a bit

No way Barkley is he 1st pick

They have 2 1sts

Barkley at #1, trade with Buffalo (4th pick) and move back and get both of their 1sts. Cle walks with 3 1's.

And they're still without a franchise QB and can't guarantee they'll be in position to grab one next year and beyond.

If they pass for a RB, they're bigger fools than I thought. Their new front office can't keep making those same kind of moves that got them in this position.
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by jreff22:
They have 2 1sts

Barkley at #1, trade with Buffalo (4th pick) and move back and get both of their 1sts. Cle walks with 3 1's.

Cleveland needs a franchise QB, not more picks. They have a ton already. You don't pass on having first choice in drafting a QB in favor of a RB in a RB loaded draft.

They wont pass on Barkley....especially with Tyrod just signed.

They have to. Tyrod isn't the future. He's just the bridge QB. They cleared Kizer out to make room for their top pick.
Originally posted by strickac:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by jreff22:
They have 2 1sts

Barkley at #1, trade with Buffalo (4th pick) and move back and get both of their 1sts. Cle walks with 3 1's.

Cleveland needs a franchise QB, not more picks. They have a ton already. You don't pass on having first choice in drafting a QB in favor of a RB in a RB loaded draft.

They wont pass on Barkley....especially with Tyrod just signed.

They have to. Tyrod isn't the future. He's just the bridge QB. They cleared Kizer out to make room for their top pick.

Tyrod isn't even signed past this season.
  • jcs
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 39,849
Originally posted by strickac:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by jreff22:
They have 2 1sts

Barkley at #1, trade with Buffalo (4th pick) and move back and get both of their 1sts. Cle walks with 3 1's.

Cleveland needs a franchise QB, not more picks. They have a ton already. You don't pass on having first choice in drafting a QB in favor of a RB in a RB loaded draft.

They wont pass on Barkley....especially with Tyrod just signed.

They have to. Tyrod isn't the future. He's just the bridge QB. They cleared Kizer out to make room for their top pick.

Unless they do something dumb like sign McCarron and expect a QB competition...
Originally posted by a49erfan77:
Originally posted by strickac:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by jreff22:
They have 2 1sts

Barkley at #1, trade with Buffalo (4th pick) and move back and get both of their 1sts. Cle walks with 3 1's.

Cleveland needs a franchise QB, not more picks. They have a ton already. You don't pass on having first choice in drafting a QB in favor of a RB in a RB loaded draft.

They wont pass on Barkley....especially with Tyrod just signed.

They have to. Tyrod isn't the future. He's just the bridge QB. They cleared Kizer out to make room for their top pick.

Tyrod isn't even signed past this season.

They have 108 million to spend. They will extend him probably 2-3 years.
Boooooring.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone