AJ Hawk possible FA

Originally posted by titan:
I know it's not a need, but P-willis and Hawk that would be sick!

I find little room to dispute this.

He'll restructure

Hawk would be nice. This guy isnt flashy, just solid.

I think bowman and spikes are better. Hawk is basically a derek smith. Gets some tackles but would be a downgrade.

Originally posted by titan:
I know it's not a need, but P-willis and Hawk that would be sick!

uhhhh, why? Because he was a top 10 pick? The guy is very weak against the run and really doesnt cover well either. They signed Desmond Bishop to a 20 million dollar deal to basically take his place next year. Had Barnett not been injured, Hawk would have been watching the Superbowl from the sidelines. He's an average player. Hell, Id rather play an unproven Bowman over Hawk, at least he's still got some upside.

Originally posted by elguapo:
I think bowman and spikes are better. Hawk is basically a derek smith. Gets some tackles but would be a downgrade.

no way. hawk is a ball hawk lol. he's more proven than bowman, and a lot younger than spikes. sorry but spikes is hurting us in the passing game, but then again it's not like hawk would help us out there. i wouldn't mind hawk. he's a gamer

Originally posted by wailers15:

Originally posted by elguapo:
I think bowman and spikes are better. Hawk is basically a derek smith. Gets some tackles but would be a downgrade.

no way. hawk is a ball hawk lol. he's more proven than bowman, and a lot younger than spikes. sorry but spikes is hurting us in the passing game, but then again it's not like hawk would help us out there. i wouldn't mind hawk. he's a gamer

It's possible, but he's been generally average for Green Bay.

I echo the sentiment above about Desmond Bishop.

i'm still thankful green bay picked him at #5 that year so we could get VD

But Hawk is a 4-3 kinda LB.. he's not made to play the 3-4, especially our type of defense, where he 's gonna end up taking all the blockers so Willis can make the play..

it would be funny to have him, given the whole Hawk/Davis debate of that draft, but I don't really think there would be any point in signing him.

Originally posted by crabman82:
i'm still thankful green bay picked him at #5 that year so we could get VD

Think of the ripple of effect that would have had. If we picked Hawk that high, no way we would have P.Willy right now.

Here is his stats for those who want to debate , if he would be good for this team

A.J. Hawk | #50 | LB

Green Bay Packers | Official Team Site

Height: 6-1 Weight: 247 Age: 27

Born: 1/6/1984 Kettering , OH

College: Ohio State

Experience: 6th season

High School: Centerville HS [OH]
team rosters
quick stats (2010)
TCKL
111
SCK
0.5
FF
0
INT
3

* Profile
* Career Stats
* Game Logs
* Game Splits
* Situational Stats



Defensive
Tackles Interceptions
Year Team G Comb Total Ast Sck SFTY PDef Int TDs Yds Avg Lng
2010 Green Bay Packers 16 111 72 39 0.5 -- 10 3 0 31 10.3 21
2009 Green Bay Packers 16 89 67 22 1.0 -- 2 2 0 42 21.0 29
2008 Green Bay Packers 16 86 67 19 3.0 -- 1 -- -- -- 0.0 --
2007 Green Bay Packers 16 105 78 27 1.0 -- 4 1 0 10 10.0 10
2006 Green Bay Packers 16 119 82 37 3.5 -- 6 2 0 31 15.5 25

Cmon now, it's not like VDs an all world yet... he too has been a disappointment thus far..

Originally posted by wailers15:

Originally posted by elguapo:
I think bowman and spikes are better. Hawk is basically a derek smith. Gets some tackles but would be a downgrade.

no way. hawk is a ball hawk lol. he's more proven than bowman, and a lot younger than spikes. sorry but spikes is hurting us in the passing game, but then again it's not like hawk would help us out there. i wouldn't mind hawk. he's a gamer

spikes is great in coverage i don't know what you've been watching