lamarr woodley | Page 3 | 49ers Webzone Forum

philosoraptor · 2011-01-07T16:22:24-08:00

Did not see a thread for him. I think he would be a good option and is still young. He can help finally bring a consistent passrush. He had 9.5 sacks last year with 50 tackles, 2 interceptions, and 3 forced fumbles. We should sign him instead of manny lawson. What does everybody think about this option? [ Edited by philosoraptor on Jan 7, 2011 at 16:31:04 ]

Jan 23, 2011 at 9:14 PM

#31

HessianDud
Veteran
Posts: 22,995

if he's available, then we have to get him.

but he won't be available.

The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.

Jan 24, 2011 at 8:09 AM

#32

lamontb
Veteran
Posts: 33,126

They need to be at his door at midnight of free agency if he's not franchised.

Jan 24, 2011 at 8:27 AM

#33

theginz2004
Veteran
Posts: 2,285

Under the current CBA he would be a RFA

Jan 24, 2011 at 6:45 PM

#34

TheVoiceOfReason
Veteran
Posts: 328

Originally posted by zeppfan1:
Originally posted by NickV:
If we stay in the 3-4 yes.

But there is NO WAY that Pitt would let him walk. They will retain him.

They are going to the Super Bowl. I think he wants to stay there or at least he should want to stay there. If he actually wants to leave and would come to San Fransico, I WANT HIM.

Insert Scorpion throwing spear on Mortal Kombat:

Get over here!

[ Edited by TheVoiceOfReason on Jan 24, 2011 at 7:09 PM ]

Jan 24, 2011 at 6:56 PM

#35

jojomellon
Member
Posts: 1,793

Originally posted by theginz2004:
Under the current CBA he would be a RFA

There is no current cba.

Jan 24, 2011 at 7:07 PM

#36

Negrodamus
Veteran
Posts: 13,782

get him here. not now but right now

Jan 24, 2011 at 10:37 PM

#37

Wodwo
Veteran
Posts: 8,476

Originally posted by Negrodamus:
get him here. not now but right now

Hai! Sokuzani!

::ninja vanish::

[ Edited by Wodwo on Jan 24, 2011 at 10:37 PM ]

Jan 25, 2011 at 6:31 AM

#38

theginz2004
Veteran
Posts: 2,285

Originally posted by jojomellon:
Originally posted by theginz2004:
Under the current CBA he would be a RFA

There is no current cba.

Quote:
Steelers OLB LaMarr Woodley had one sack in Sunday's win over the Jets, giving him at least one sack in six straight playoff games.

It's yet another NFL record for Woodley, who also had two sacks in each of his first four playoff games. The Packers had some trouble containing Julius Peppers yesterday and slowing down Woodley will be just as difficult. Note that under the current CBA, Woodley would be a restricted free agent after the season.

Yeah I thought so too. Maybe that means that if they settle with the same terms as last year, he would be a RFA?
http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&id=4224

Jan 25, 2011 at 10:35 AM

#39

lamontb
Veteran
Posts: 33,126

Originally posted by theginz2004:
Originally posted by jojomellon:
Originally posted by theginz2004:
Under the current CBA he would be a RFA

There is no current cba.

Quote:
Steelers OLB LaMarr Woodley had one sack in Sunday's win over the Jets, giving him at least one sack in six straight playoff games.

It's yet another NFL record for Woodley, who also had two sacks in each of his first four playoff games. The Packers had some trouble containing Julius Peppers yesterday and slowing down Woodley will be just as difficult. Note that under the current CBA, Woodley would be a restricted free agent after the season.

Yeah I thought so too. Maybe that means that if they settle with the same terms as last year, he would be a RFA?
http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&id=4224

The current CBA expires march 1st or 4th I believe. So there is currently a CBA. When the owners decided to not renew the current CBA sometime last year all these so called "poison pills" kicked in to get both sides to reach an agreement. The RFA for guys with under 4 years in the league was one of those poison pills that was believed would force the players to agree. B/c all the players want to be free agents as soon as possible so they can cash in. and for the owners it was the no salary cap. Remember folks going crazy saying Synder, and Jones would just buy all the free agents. Thus forcing all the other owners to agree to a deal. Notice not a lot of players got big deals this off season, thus why the Players union is suing for collusion between the owners.

So in short if the new CBA is similar to the old CBA in regards to free agency then Woodley would be a free agent b/c those poison pills will no longer exist. And every player that was a RFA last year due to that poision pill will be free agents as well. Of course they can still be franchise him.