There are 405 users in the forums
V-Jac
- 1 2
Sep 6, 2010 at 1:18 PM
- matt49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,458
if he didn't want $50M than yes I would love to have him. We are set at WR no need to spend a bunch of $ on Jackson when we need to use that $ to extend VD/Goldston/Franklin and either extend Smith or sign a new QB next year.
The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.
Sep 6, 2010 at 1:51 PM
- jimmy49erfan
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,895
Originally posted by ads_2006:
We have no idea what san diego wants in return
I think they want too much
and we would have to pay jackson $$$$$$$$
They want a 2nd a 3rd but a 2nd would do. Vjack wants 30 mill guaranteed. Its very doable for a uncapped year and if we write in clauses for his off field behavior.
Gives us 2 #1 caliber WRs and leaves Morgan and Ginn to fight it out in the slot. It guarantees VD will be facing a LB and stops any team from stacking the box. You also add in the factors for our QB from having a WR of his caliber would be all positive. We could still sign VD, Lawson and Smith while adding VJack no problem. We might just have to let Goldson and Clements go I think.
Sep 6, 2010 at 1:58 PM
- CrAnKD4TCRabTree
- Member
- Posts: 868
Were a running football team. hed also be a waste of money because Crabtrees gonna break out and have a better career than him
Sep 6, 2010 at 1:58 PM
- jrg
- Veteran
- Posts: 166,549
Originally posted by NC49erfan82:
Nice to have but not gonna happen.
Sep 6, 2010 at 4:11 PM
- prime21
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,062
Super Bowl...str8 up.
Sep 6, 2010 at 10:25 PM
- JedYork
- Member
- Posts: 177
Originally posted by Godsleftsock:Originally posted by StOnEy333:
This thread belongs in NFL Talk, as Vincent Jackson is currently on the San Diego Chargers, and not a Free Agent. So now you know.
And knowing is half the battle.
I was gonna post that one but you're two steps ahead
FTW
- 1 2
