Would You Welcome Michael Vick with Open Arms ? | Page 3

ZRF80 · 2009-11-19T20:32:05-08:00

Yes, I know he's a dog killer. Dont go all PETA on me. But he's done his best to make amends, although there will always be some that never accept him. With that in mind, Im sure the Eagles dont have any long term plans for him, and we could do with a player that has a "legit" background. Combine that with the fact that the FA list for QBs is weak (along a weak QB draft class) in 2010, and he very may be the best available at the position. Not to mention he's a player with no identity. He would never be remembered as a Falcon, since he didnt get an opportunity to fulfill his "destiny" over there. So, my fellow Niner mates..........dont you think Vick could be an asset on this team ? He's got an arm, no doubt, and his legs would make him dangerous in our system. Teams would have no choice but to account for his running ability, and that could mean big gains for our receivers. Oh, and he's free. No draft picks, no trades......and Im sure he'll sign cheap. What do you think ?

Nov 20, 2009 at 12:57 PM

#31

crzy
Hall of Fame
Posts: 40,285

Vick f**king sucks. So hell no.

Nov 20, 2009 at 2:11 PM

#32

backontop
Veteran
Posts: 14,346

you bash Smith and now you want vick on the team.

Nov 20, 2009 at 4:19 PM

#33

ZRF80
Member
Posts: 13,551

Originally posted by backontop:
you bash Smith and now you want vick on the team.

Yes, because with Vick I can post a ?

With Smith, I can post a ! Smith blows, and he's proving it over and over. Sing's already caught on, as he didnt give Alex any chance to f**k it up against the Bears in the 4th last week.

Now its time to move on.......we either do it via free agency or through the draft. The draft looks pretty weak, and even if we picked up a viable QB......it would take another 2-3 years to develop him into a quality QB. In that time, Maunsky could possible go along with a number of players that have our defense ranked top 10 in the league. And Gore isnt getting any younger......

So the only realistic option is free agency. Unfortunately, there are no quality players available this offseason. And we're dreaming if we think we can land someone like McNabb. Therefore, you go out and pick up the best of the worst, who in this case happens to be Michael Vick. The plus side is that he has had success in Atlanta, for what its worth. He may not be the best, but he has a strong arm and he's mobile ala Randall Cunningham. He's someone our coaches could work with. I cant say the same for Brady Quinn, D. Andersen, etc.

If we go into next season with Alex Smith as starter, season over.......just like I said when we put him in against Houston. You can see how much he's learned in his 5 years of starting........ha !

Therefore, Vick is a reasonable option.

Nov 20, 2009 at 4:32 PM

#34

backontop
Veteran
Posts: 14,346

Originally posted by ZRF80:
Originally posted by backontop:
you bash Smith and now you want vick on the team.

Yes, because with Vick I can post a ?

With Smith, I can post a ! Smith blows, and he's proving it over and over. Sing's already caught on, as he didnt give Alex any chance to f**k it up against the Bears in the 4th last week.

Now its time to move on.......we either do it via free agency or through the draft. The draft looks pretty weak, and even if we picked up a viable QB......it would take another 2-3 years to develop him into a quality QB. In that time, Maunsky could possible go along with a number of players that have our defense ranked top 10 in the league. And Gore isnt getting any younger......

So the only realistic option is free agency. Unfortunately, there are no quality players available this offseason. And we're dreaming if we think we can land someone like McNabb. Therefore, you go out and pick up the best of the worst, who in this case happens to be Michael Vick. The plus side is that he has had success in Atlanta, for what its worth. He may not be the best, but he has a strong arm and he's mobile ala Randall Cunningham. He's someone our coaches could work with. I cant say the same for Brady Quinn, D. Andersen, etc.

If we go into next season with Alex Smith as starter, season over.......just like I said when we put him in against Houston. You can see how much he's learned in his 5 years of starting........ha !

Therefore, Vick is a reasonable option.

you really shouldn't post when your under the influence of narcotics

Nov 20, 2009 at 5:39 PM

#35

matt49er
Veteran
Posts: 7,459

Originally posted by YourHuckleberry:
Jesus, NO! Why do people keep bringing up Vick?

I don't even care about the dog thing, I don't want him because he sucks.

yeah Vick sucks now, I live in the philly area and my girl is an Eagles fan so i'm stuck watching the Eagles along w/the 9ers most Sundays and Vick not good at all. The Eagles barley use him at all, he's not even a good wildcat QB.

Nov 20, 2009 at 7:30 PM

#36

ZRF80
Member
Posts: 13,551

Originally posted by backontop:
Originally posted by ZRF80:
Originally posted by backontop:
you bash Smith and now you want vick on the team.

Yes, because with Vick I can post a ?

With Smith, I can post a ! Smith blows, and he's proving it over and over. Sing's already caught on, as he didnt give Alex any chance to f**k it up against the Bears in the 4th last week.

Now its time to move on.......we either do it via free agency or through the draft. The draft looks pretty weak, and even if we picked up a viable QB......it would take another 2-3 years to develop him into a quality QB. In that time, Maunsky could possible go along with a number of players that have our defense ranked top 10 in the league. And Gore isnt getting any younger......

So the only realistic option is free agency. Unfortunately, there are no quality players available this offseason. And we're dreaming if we think we can land someone like McNabb. Therefore, you go out and pick up the best of the worst, who in this case happens to be Michael Vick. The plus side is that he has had success in Atlanta, for what its worth. He may not be the best, but he has a strong arm and he's mobile ala Randall Cunningham. He's someone our coaches could work with. I cant say the same for Brady Quinn, D. Andersen, etc.

If we go into next season with Alex Smith as starter, season over.......just like I said when we put him in against Houston. You can see how much he's learned in his 5 years of starting........ha !

Therefore, Vick is a reasonable option.

you really shouldn't post when your under the influence of narcotics

Zing ! You got me there. Good one.....

Nov 30, 2009 at 12:09 PM

#37

49erman5692
Member
Posts: 4,657

over Shaun Hill

Nov 30, 2009 at 1:10 PM

#38

rigs49
Veteran
Posts: 4,421

Yes, I believe we could be a better team with Michael Vick on our side.

Nov 30, 2009 at 1:20 PM

#39

Ninerbowl6
Veteran
Posts: 800

Originally posted by YourHuckleberry:
Jesus, NO! Why do people keep bringing up Vick?

I don't even care about the dog thing, I don't want him because he sucks.

This^^^

Nov 30, 2009 at 2:18 PM

#40

English
Moderator
Posts: 41,374

Originally posted by Ninerbowl6:
Originally posted by YourHuckleberry:
Jesus, NO! Why do people keep bringing up Vick?

I don't even care about the dog thing, I don't want him because he sucks.

This^^^

Kick returner?

Dec 1, 2009 at 4:53 PM

#41

9erfanAUS
Veteran
Posts: 16,281

Wow.

-9fA

Dec 1, 2009 at 4:57 PM

#42

HoneyBadger49er
Veteran
Posts: 19,054

he's a dog killer

Dec 1, 2009 at 6:57 PM

#43

AXEGRINDER
Veteran
Posts: 25,679

Vick is garbage. Let him rot on someone else's bench.

Dec 14, 2009 at 7:31 PM

#44

49ersnum1
Veteran
Posts: 2,265

Dont get me wrong, Im THE biggest Smith fan probably on the PLANET!! Smith is playing the best he has, BUT there are still throws he misses and locks on that puts us in a bad situation.. (batted balls, INT) Vick is known for his accuracy, consistency, and NOT turning the ball over.. what do u guys think.. just a thought, b.c Vick has been improving the last few weeks and shows off that beautiful arm! and dont get me wrong, I want Smith to be the guy and succeed!!

Dec 14, 2009 at 7:38 PM

#45

pantstickle
Hall of Fame
Posts: 3,467

Originally posted by 49ersnum1:
Dont get me wrong, Im THE biggest Smith fan probably on the PLANET!! Smith is playing the best he has, BUT there are still throws he misses and locks on that puts us in a bad situation.. (batted balls, INT) Vick is known for his accuracy, consistency, and NOT turning the ball over.. what do u guys think.. just a thought, b.c Vick has been improving the last few weeks and shows off that beautiful arm! and dont get me wrong, I want Smith to be the guy and succeed!!

Where? In prison?

He's a career 53% passer, and taking out his fluke 2002 year, he has a TD/INT ratio of 56/44.

He's known for running real fast and being a below average passer.