Originally posted by NeeJ49er:Originally posted by 9NERNATE:Originally posted by ziggy_gonna_rock:
Better than hill .
Wade has return experience but may be slower than both .
He's better then Hill, Battle and Spurlock.
I wouldnt go that far, he is a short yardage receiver and rarely gets seperation after the catch, adding him will not improve the offense, Spurlock and Hill are far more explosive and I would take Battle over Wade everytime...
Numbers don't lie. He's a short yardage receiver? What's Battle, Hill and Spurlock? They haven't done sh*t in this league and he has with terrible QB's throwing to him.
We don't have time with the o-line right now for any deep threats (if you can call Hill and Spurlock that).