There are 350 users in the forums
Originally posted by tankle104:hopefully we get to keep him for another year but we will have to put a first round tender on him, even then we may still lose him. That or we trade him to some desperate team.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by tankle104:
hopefully we get to keep him for another year but we will have to put a first round tender on him, even then we may still lose him. That or we trade him to some desperate team.
Time out...you think a team is gonna give up a 1st rd pick and pay Mullen's a substantial contract?
Not a chance in hell.
Originally posted by 9erfanAUS:Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by tankle104:hopefully we get to keep him for another year but we will have to put a first round tender on him, even then we may still lose him. That or we trade him to some desperate team.
Time out...you think a team is gonna give up a 1st rd pick and pay Mullen's a substantial contract?
Not a chance in hell.
lol, the overreaction to one game..
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
Originally posted by 9erfanAUS:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by tankle104:
hopefully we get to keep him for another year but we will have to put a first round tender on him, even then we may still lose him. That or we trade him to some desperate team.
Time out...you think a team is gonna give up a 1st rd pick and pay Mullen's a substantial contract?
Not a chance in hell.
lol, the overreaction to one game..
Just like week 1 where all of a sudden it was time to tank for Lawrence
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:Originally posted by 9erfanAUS:Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by tankle104:hopefully we get to keep him for another year but we will have to put a first round tender on him, even then we may still lose him. That or we trade him to some desperate team.
Time out...you think a team is gonna give up a 1st rd pick and pay Mullen's a substantial contract?
Not a chance in hell.
lol, the overreaction to one game..
Just like week 1 where all of a sudden it was time to tank for Lawrence
Originally posted by 9erfanAUS:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by tankle104:
hopefully we get to keep him for another year but we will have to put a first round tender on him, even then we may still lose him. That or we trade him to some desperate team.
Time out...you think a team is gonna give up a 1st rd pick and pay Mullen's a substantial contract?
Not a chance in hell.
lol, the overreaction to one game..
Originally posted by Psinex:
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
Originally posted by 9erfanAUS:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by tankle104:
hopefully we get to keep him for another year but we will have to put a first round tender on him, even then we may still lose him. That or we trade him to some desperate team.
Time out...you think a team is gonna give up a 1st rd pick and pay Mullen's a substantial contract?
Not a chance in hell.
lol, the overreaction to one game..
Just like week 1 where all of a sudden it was time to tank for Lawrence
Suddenly there are a bunch of people wanting Mullens over Jimmy after a big game against one of the worst teams in the league. Wait until he throws two INT's and fumbles it against the Rams or some good team. Everyone will want Mullens released and traded. 49ers QB's are crucified like Jesus.
Well we got Dee Ford for a 2nd and got Jimmy for a 2nd, hopefully ShanaLynch can perform a miracle and get a 1st rounder.Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by tankle104:hopefully we get to keep him for another year but we will have to put a first round tender on him, even then we may still lose him. That or we trade him to some desperate team.
Time out...you think a team is gonna give up a 1st rd pick and pay Mullen's a substantial contract?
Not a chance in hell.
Usually its the bottom 5 to 7 teams every year withOriginally posted by tankle104:Originally posted by 9erfanAUS:Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by tankle104:hopefully we get to keep him for another year but we will have to put a first round tender on him, even then we may still lose him. That or we trade him to some desperate team.
Time out...you think a team is gonna give up a 1st rd pick and pay Mullen's a substantial contract?
Not a chance in hell.
lol, the overreaction to one game..
Its really not too crazy of an idea. a lot of QBs are getting overpaid right now. Every year some desperate team does stupid s**t.
front office, a newbie coach that makes decisions that, hopefully, ShanaLynch can fleece for a first or 2nd round pick.
Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by Niners99:The lowest paid starting QB who isnt on a rookie contract is Teddy Bridgewater at 21 million per year. Why would Nick Mullens accept less than that to become a starter on a new deal? That would only save us 6 mil. Why would going with a backup with a very limited sample size over a guy you went to the SB with be a good idea? To save 6 mil? Makes no sense.
Mullen is a RFA next yr, he will be in SF.
Originally posted by RasSuar:Salah really needs to figure out a solution for running qb's. We allowed Daniel jones to look dual threat today
We need to run that 3-3-5 defense I've been talking about. Lions used it a bit against Kyler Murray in the Detroit win today.
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:Originally posted by 9erfanAUS:Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by tankle104:hopefully we get to keep him for another year but we will have to put a first round tender on him, even then we may still lose him. That or we trade him to some desperate team.
Time out...you think a team is gonna give up a 1st rd pick and pay Mullen's a substantial contract?
Not a chance in hell.
lol, the overreaction to one game..
Just like week 1 where all of a sudden it was time to tank for Lawrence
Originally posted by tankle104:Its really not too crazy of an idea. a lot of QBs are getting overpaid right now. Every year some desperate team does stupid s**t.
Originally posted by Niners99:I was talking about the (ridiculous) hypothetical situation that the 49ers would give Mullens a long term deal in the offseason and dump Jimmy.
Originally posted by Rathof44:
Worked for Mississippi State
