Originally posted by RishikeshA:Originally posted by btthepunk:Head coach and we fixed it.
Absolutely
Lolz
There are 236 users in the forums
Biggest Offseason Need?
Biggest Offseason Need?
Jan 24, 2016 at 2:20 PM
- Cjez
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 163,128
Lolz
Jan 24, 2016 at 2:33 PM
- elguapo
- Veteran
- Posts: 25,127
A pass rusher and a true number 1 wr. I would say ol but if Davis comes back our tackles are solid and tiller is a solid guard. Throw some cash at Mack and we are good on the ol
Jan 24, 2016 at 2:48 PM
- 4everFaithful
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,646
Originally posted by elguapo:A pass rusher and a true number 1 wr. I would say ol but if Davis comes back our tackles are solid and tiller is a solid guard. Throw some cash at Mack and we are good on the ol
I agree, more than anything I want us to bring in a true #1 WR... Josh Gordon?
Jan 24, 2016 at 2:54 PM
- HERN
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,444
Jan 24, 2016 at 3:04 PM
- Niners418
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,744
Originally posted by HERN:
Get this man. #1 realistic target
Jan 24, 2016 at 3:09 PM
- qnnhan7
- Veteran
- Posts: 34,180
From what I've gathered about Kelly's offense, if he wants to go more spread, he has to have a good Oline to compensate for less protection for the qb.
Jan 24, 2016 at 3:39 PM
- BigBug415
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,358
Originally posted by Bluestrider12:I hope pass rush is a priority for the draft. Watching the AFC Championship, Miller/Ware are the difference makers in the game.
This.
Jan 24, 2016 at 3:48 PM
- LasVegasWally
- Veteran
- Posts: 24,271
OL - I'm not confident in AD - just a gut feeling.
I like Schwartz, Glenn
Pass Rusher Hoping for Vernon and ?
DLine - Malik Jackson and ?
I like Schwartz, Glenn
Pass Rusher Hoping for Vernon and ?
DLine - Malik Jackson and ?
Jan 24, 2016 at 3:54 PM
- JerrySandwich
- UptightVegemite
- Posts: 13,434
The biggest offseason need is for the other 31 teams to become defunct so the 49ers win the SB by default
Jan 24, 2016 at 4:15 PM
- NinerSickness
- Member
- Posts: 8,897
In order:
1. QB
2. QB
3. QB
1. QB
2. QB
3. QB
Jan 24, 2016 at 4:28 PM
- Mdizzle27
- Veteran
- Posts: 233
How about all of the above
Jan 24, 2016 at 4:28 PM
- pete98146
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,618
We have a ton of needs. So realistically, we'll be choosing between Buckner, Jack, Treadwell or Stanley. A valid argument can be made for all four of them.
If I were to rank these players 1-4 it would be:
1. Stanley - quality OT are so hard to find.
2. Jack - love his athleticism, we need help at LB and oh boy can he cover
3. Treadwell - what's not to love? We need a #1 WR
4. Buckner - fortifies the DL and you win in the trenches.
I'd be happy with any of these guys.
If I were to rank these players 1-4 it would be:
1. Stanley - quality OT are so hard to find.
2. Jack - love his athleticism, we need help at LB and oh boy can he cover
3. Treadwell - what's not to love? We need a #1 WR
4. Buckner - fortifies the DL and you win in the trenches.
I'd be happy with any of these guys.
Jan 24, 2016 at 4:42 PM
- JoseCortez
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,245
Where's the GM option?
Jan 24, 2016 at 4:43 PM
- joaosoarrs99
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,096
Originally posted by pete98146:We have a ton of needs. So realistically, we'll be choosing between Buckner, Jack, Treadwell or Stanley. A valid argument can be made for all four of them.
If I were to rank these players 1-4 it would be:
1. Stanley - quality OT are so hard to find.
2. Jack - love his athleticism, we need help at LB and oh boy can he cover
3. Treadwell - what's not to love? We need a #1 WR
4. Buckner - fortifies the DL and you win in the trenches.
I'd be happy with any of these guys.
If I were to choose between those 4 plays I would rank this way:
1.Buckner - Blue chip player IMO.
2.Stanley - Very good player who is a good pass and run blocker.
3.Jack - He's good but Baalke has find good LBs in the mid rounds(Bowman and Borland).
4.Treadwell - IMO he's a top-20 not a top-10 pick
Jan 24, 2016 at 6:27 PM
- 4everFaithful
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,646
Originally posted by JoseCortez:Where's the GM option?
Lol true