Spiller in the 1st or McCluster later? | Page 2

Feb 28, 2010 at 12:18 PM

mayo49
Veteran
Posts: 64,320

Originally posted by ObePwnD:
Originally posted by mayo63:
Originally posted by ObePwnD:
With a 4.28 40 under his belt, Spiller will be gone by the 13th pick.

By whom?

Probably the stupid Raiders - you know Al loves speed.

His second run was 4.27.

Mmmm. Forgot about the Raiders. But, whom besides the Raiders would take him? I find it hard to find a club who would take him in the top 12.

Feb 28, 2010 at 12:19 PM

#17

Dapro
Veteran
Posts: 807

Don't be surprise if Raiders draft Spiller. Al loves speed and he don't care they have McFadden already there. They had Marcus Allen and still drafted Bo in the past.

Feb 28, 2010 at 12:21 PM

#18

toeknee
Veteran
Posts: 54,571

ROUND ONE
1. St. Louis (1-15)
2. Detroit (2-14)
3. Tampa Bay (3-13)
4. Washington (4-12)
5. Kansas City (4-12)
6. Seattle (5-11)
7. Cleveland (5-11)
8. Oakland (5-11)
9. Buffalo (6-10)
10. Jacksonville (7-9)
11. Denver (from Chicago 7-9)
12. Miami (7-9)
13. San Francisco (8-8)

Could Seattle take Spiller at 6? Could Oakland after drafting McFadden #1? Could Jax even though they have MJD? I can't see Denver or Miami pulling the trigger.

Feb 28, 2010 at 12:22 PM

#19

ObePwnD
Veteran
Posts: 9,466

Originally posted by Esco:
Originally posted by ObePwnD:
Originally posted by mayo63:
Originally posted by ObePwnD:
With a 4.28 40 under his belt, Spiller will be gone by the 13th pick.

By whom?

Probably the stupid Raiders - you know Al loves speed.

That wouldn't make a lot of sense seeing that they just drafted McFadden a few years ago... in other words it just might happen.

Yeah, Al doesn't have a history of making sense, does he? A kicker in the First, Heyward-Gay as 7th overall...anything is possible with that clown.

Feb 28, 2010 at 12:27 PM

#20

noobie
Veteran
Posts: 252

Spiller at 17 not 13

Feb 28, 2010 at 12:27 PM

#21

tjd808185
Veteran
Posts: 26,008

Originally posted by Dapro:
Don't be surprise if Raiders draft Spiller. Al loves speed and he don't care they have McFadden already there. They had Marcus Allen and still drafted Bo in the past.

Al almost always drafts a position of need. Yeah he loves the 40 time but he doesn't draft guys just to have them. Al's going to take the biggest freak at DE or OT. Take that to the bank.

Seattle really poses the biggest threat to taking Spiller. If they're sitting there at 14 and they really want him they can make it happen.

[ Edited by tjd808185 on Feb 28, 2010 at 12:29:50 ]

Feb 28, 2010 at 12:29 PM

#22

Dapro
Veteran
Posts: 807

You guys think Seattle will use the 6th pick for Spiller?

Feb 28, 2010 at 12:32 PM

#23

YungBird
Veteran
Posts: 21,475

4.37 official time for Spiller

Feb 28, 2010 at 12:34 PM

#24

9erfanAUS
Veteran
Posts: 16,281

Originally posted by mayo63:
Originally posted by ObePwnD:
With a 4.28 40 under his belt, Spiller will be gone by the 13th pick.

By whom?

I actually think that some team will trade up for him. Could be either San Diego or even Philadelphia.

-9fA

Feb 28, 2010 at 12:39 PM

#25

Jakemall
Veteran
Posts: 21,600

I still like Best in the 2nd.

Feb 28, 2010 at 1:06 PM

#26

49ersalldaway126
Veteran
Posts: 14,549

best> spiller

Feb 28, 2010 at 1:30 PM

#27

Ninerjohn
Veteran
Posts: 66,250

Originally posted by teeohh:
ROUND ONE
1. St. Louis (1-15)
2. Detroit (2-14)
3. Tampa Bay (3-13)
4. Washington (4-12)
5. Kansas City (4-12)
6. Seattle (5-11)
7. Cleveland (5-11)
8. Oakland (5-11)
9. Buffalo (6-10)
10. Jacksonville (7-9)
11. Denver (from Chicago 7-9)
12. Miami (7-9)
13. San Francisco (8-8)

Could Seattle take Spiller at 6? Could Oakland after drafting McFadden #1? Could Jax even though they have MJD? I can't see Denver or Miami pulling the trigger.

I would be very surprised if Seattle takes Spiller that high. That would mean they pass on Okung or Berry which I dont see happening. Raiders? No. I really think that Spiller will be there at 13 unless a team jumps up to get him.

Feb 28, 2010 at 1:39 PM

#28

JD81
Veteran
Posts: 3,600

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
I would like either but if you pass on Spiller there is not guarantee that McCluster will be there in round 2. If there are 2 OT's and Spiller all there at 13 I would then take Spiller in the first and grab the OT at 17.

This.

Feb 28, 2010 at 2:49 PM

#29

Nuns
Veteran
Posts: 1,301

Toby Gerhart ran faster than Mccluster.

Feb 28, 2010 at 2:59 PM

#30

bigwads
Veteran
Posts: 5,890

Originally posted by Esco:
Originally posted by ObePwnD:
Originally posted by mayo63:
Originally posted by ObePwnD:
With a 4.28 40 under his belt, Spiller will be gone by the 13th pick.

By whom?

Probably the stupid Raiders - you know Al loves speed.

That wouldn't make a lot of sense seeing that they just drafted McFadden a few years ago... in other words it just might happen.

...exactly