Cary Edmondson-USA TODAY Sports

Cary Edmondson-USA TODAY Sports


49ers Path Forward with Arik Armstead Should be to Maximize His Trade Value

Levin T. Black
Feb 21, 2020 at 12:18 PM6


Extended runs of success in the NFL don't come without moving on from some great players. To build a winner a team must acquire talent. To remain a winner a team must master the balancing act between the salary cap and keeping that talent. When 49ers general manager John Lynch and head coach Kyle Shanahan were hired the team was as deep into needing talent as a franchise can go. After making the Super Bowl, the pendulum has flipped completely the other way.

The 49ers are on the mountaintop of the National Football Conference. They've entered the delicate balance time period where they must make the right call on a string of crucial personnel decisions if they want to remain at the top. A vast majority of the time teams make the wrong choices. In fact, only one team, the New England Patriots, in the past 25 years has made it back to the Super Bowl the year after losing it.

The first pendulum swinging choice the 49ers must make is in regards to defensive lineman Arik Armstead. There is no denying he is an excellent player. He may not have made a Pro Bowl at this point in his career but there is no argument against calling him a Pro Bowl-caliber player following a ten sack season.

Those sacks came from the defensive tackle position as Armstead lined up there on passing downs. Double-digit sacks from the inside is a rare feat that teams pay big money for. Armstead is a free agent and is due for a substantial contract.

The 49ers have three avenues to pursue. They can either sign Armstead to a multi-year deal worth $12-to-15 million per year, let him sign with another team or franchise tag him and trade him to another team willing to sign him long-term. The last option is the correct one.

The 49ers can't reward every quality player they manage to acquire with a huge contract. In a perfect world the team could. In the NFL world former 49ers owner Eddie DeBartolo had, he could reward players to keep them around and that made the team a dynasty that won five titles. There was no salary cap. Unfortunately for the 49ers, Armstead and the fans, teams do have a salary cap.

Yes, the 49ers don't have a lot of cap space. This certainly plays a big role in the decision but it's only part of it. The real issue is the money already allocated to Armstead's position group. Defensive end Dee Ford signed a five-year deal worth $85.5 million last off-season, defensive tackle DeForest Buckner is very likely to get an extension in the coming weeks worth considerably more than the projected amount Armstead will get and defensive end Nick Bosa will see his cap cost number climb to $10.7 million through the next few seasons.

While this is bound to change by a million or two with Buckner's extension, as it sits right now Buckner, Bosa and Ford will count for $37.85 million on the 2020 salary cap. All three of them will see their cap hits climb by at least a few million in the next few seasons.

Buckner, Bosa and Ford represent approximately 20 percent of the salary cap. The 2020 expected salary cap is $200 million. This means the 49ers can pay an average of about $3.2 million per player to fill out the full 53-man roster ($200 million minus $40 million divided by 50 players). Other players, like quarterback Jimmy Garoppolo, will count for much more than that.

Should the 49ers devote another $12-15 million towards the defensive line? That would push the 49ers starting defensive line's salary north of $50 million per season. That's more than one quarter of the entire salary cap.

The answer to the question is a resounding no. That leaves two options. Let Armstead walk free and clear or franchise him and trade him. Letting Armstead pick his future team would be doing him a solid and by all accounts he is an upstanding gentleman on good terms with the team. You don't stay on the summit by doing players a solid, at least not when the value is so much.

Make no mistake, the value Armstead has is high. A 26-year-old player who can play inside and outside and get pressure consistently is extremely valuable. There are two examples of a player who could get double-digit sacks being traded from last season.

One of those players was Frank Clark. He was traded by the Seattle Seahawks to the Kansas City Chiefs. The value the Seahawks got in return was a first-round pick, a swap of third-round picks and a second-round pick in the next draft. Armstead doesn't carry quite that much value. Clark's track record was stronger. The other recent example is a better one to compare with.

No team is more familiar with the scenario of trading a defensive lineman on the franchise tag than the 49ers. This is because they traded their 2020 second-round pick for Ford just last off-season. Ford was a player last year with a level of respect similar to Armstead currently.

Ford did have two seasons of double-digit sacks prior to the trade. Armstead only has one. However, Ford had some red flags in his injury history.

He had twice missed time due to a lumbar injury in his lower back. The second time came with a major surgery. During his recovery, Ford said his doctor was concerned that he may not walk correctly again. In a Bleacher Report article from this time last year, Ford revealed he struggled to walk for weeks after the surgery and only weighed 215 pounds. This hurt his trade value.

Armstead did have injury issues early in his career but none were as severe as Ford's. Also, Armstead has played every game the past two seasons. Injuries are not a concern.

Armstead is good against the run and pass. This also boosts his trade value compared to Ford. This is because he had played a pass rush role from the outside linebacker position for the Chiefs and would need to transition to the line.

Based on all this, it certainly seems like the 49ers could get a second-round draft pick for Armstead. This is always valuable but for the 49ers it could be even more so this year. The team has its first-round pick and then nothing until the fifth round. A potential second-round pick is simply too valuable to let Armstead sign with another team.

But is there risk with applying the franchise tag and not finding a trade partner? Yeah, sure, sort of. The 49ers can trade Armstead on the franchise tag. There's a chance the 49ers may not get as high of a pick in return as they would hope but getting something is guaranteed. All 31 teams would trade a late round pick without hesitation.

Plus, if the 49ers get favorable extensions done with Buckner and other players who could potentially sign one this off-season, the team could just as well decide to keep Armstead on the franchise tag. It's doubtful but at some point the return being offered by other teams could fall below the value Armstead brings suiting up while on the tag.

In all likelihood, the 49ers will get at least a third-round pick in this year's draft if they choose to go the franchise and trade route. That is the best path forward if the 49ers want to climb to the top of the NFL rather than just the NFC.
  • Levin T. Black
  • Written by:
    A graduate of Ball State University in 2009, Levin was an award winning sports journalist until he transitioned into a different career. He's written for Webzone since 2018.
The views within this article are those of the writer and, while just as important, are not necessarily those of the site as a whole.


6 Comments

  • Pasodoc9er
    I think you are way off track here, tho recognize this is a commonly held thot. But to trade away a kid who is as good outside as inside? How many of those are there in the NFL? Few. As for paying the DL $50 mil per...did you watch that DL demoralize the league last yr? $50 mil for a $100 mil DL which could get us a SB...that is cheap. Sign Arik the outside/inside DT. We need more PT from Dee or need to trade him. Solly? If you have to trade someone, he’s it. I like him but Arik is the key to success with both Nick and Buck. $50 mil DL? Helluva deal. Trade Arik and we will just try and replace him the next 4 yrs. Me? I’d rather watch him in SB with his buds ...as a 49er.
    Feb 22, 2020 at 1:01 PM
    1
  • Bill
    Wish we could get rid of Ford and keep Armstead.
    Feb 21, 2020 at 8:02 PM
    3
  • Daniner
    Disagree with value. If the Niners trade him, they will acquire multiple picks. He’s in his prime, in one most important positions and he has versatility. Likely, they would get a second and a fourth and maybe 3rd next year. Something like that.
    Feb 21, 2020 at 6:58 PM
    1
  • CorvaNinerFan
    I think tagging then trading's the right thing to do...it could really help fill the void of draft picks between rds 2-5. Agree Thomas needs to go...but it's not an either/or deal. It's a both deal. Niners need cap space and draft picks. That way, they can re-sign some other players (like Blair, Sanders, etc) and nab another FA or two. Lynch would need to beef up the DL depth, but that's very doable for not a lot of $$.
    Feb 21, 2020 at 4:10 PM
    0
  • Michael cortese
    Definitely get rid of Solomon Thomas. He is not worth the pay check. Every time he was on the field he was not able to produce. Ronald Blair made more of an impact for a fraction of the price
    Feb 21, 2020 at 1:42 PM
    0
  • Chris Fuller
    I would much rather see the team try and move Soloman Thomas in a trade. Thomas would not bring back a high draft pick, but getting rid of the 9 million dollar cap hit would free up room for Armstead on the 2020 roster. The Niners could pick up a player like AJ Epenesa in the 3rd or 4th round with the draft pick they get from the Soloman Thomas trade to shore up their D-line depth.
    Feb 21, 2020 at 1:00 PM
    3

Facebook Comments



More San Francisco 49ers News



Zierlein explains why the 49ers should give Trey Lance playing time in 2021

By David Bonilla
May 8, 2021

As soon as the team traded up to the No. 3 overall spot, NFL Media analyst Lance Zierlein felt Trey Lance to the San Francisco 49ers made a lot of sense. To him and many others, it certainly made more sense than drafting Mac Jones. "When you look at this, to me, OK, big, mobile, has experience under center, is highly intelligent, even as a young player," Zierlein explained on Friday during a KNBR interview. "Trey Lance is a guy that made perfect sense." There is some uncertainty surrounding when fans will get a good look at Lance running the 49ers offense. CEO Jed York told NBC Sports Bay Area this week that ownership is comfortable paying Jimmy Garoppolo's



La Canfora: Strong expectation among NFL GMs that 49ers try to trade Jimmy Garoppolo this week

By David Bonilla
Apr 27, 2021

The San Francisco 49ers have repeatedly stated that quarterback Jimmy Garoppolo remains in the team's plans for 2021. That would mean a rookie sitting behind him for at least the upcoming season, which makes sense. The 49ers are built to win now and have shown they can do so with Garoppolo at the helm. However, his durability has become a concern after missing 23 games over the past three seasons. Maybe that won't remain the plan. Jason La Canfora of CBS Sports reports that there is a "very strong" expectation around the league that San Francisco will make an effort to trade Garoppolo before or even during the draft. "Timing isn't great with 5 QBs about to go in 1st round, but Jimmy G's future there now seen as bleak," wrote La Canfora via



49ers TE George Kittle says Seahawks tried to trade up to draft him

By David Bonilla
Apr 28, 2021

Seattle Seahawks tight end George Kittle. That probably doesn't sound very good to San Francisco 49ers fans, but it could have happened. The All-Pro recently spoke with Matt Verderame on the Stacking The Box podcast (h/t to Tzvi Machlin of The Spun) and shared a story from the 2017 NFL Draft when a team tried to move up to grab him. Kittle's agent told him that he felt the former Iowa tight end might be selected as high as the second round, if lucky. However, most likely, they were looking at somewhere between the third and the sixth rounds. The 49ers ended up selecting Kittle in the fifth round, No. 146 overall, but



49ers have no plans to trade Jimmy Garoppolo right now, but multiple teams expected to inquire

By David Bonilla
Apr 29, 2021

A report surfaced yesterday stating that the New England Patriots were preparing a new contract for Jimmy Garoppolo — just in case the San Francisco 49ers decided to trade the veteran quarterback. Another report stated that the expectation around the league is that the Niners would try to move Garoppolo before or during the draft, which kicks off tonight. NFL Network's Tom Pelissero says that there are currently no plans to trade Garoppolo. However, he adds that multiple teams are expected to reach out to San Francisco today to inquire about the


Featured

More by Levin T. Black

More Articles

Share 49ersWebzone