The marriage makes sense in the short-term for both Brady and the 49ers. Of course, the next couple of years is all Brady is thinking about because he is at the end of his illustrious career.
Sure, as Skip Bayless said last week, Brady landing with the team he cheered while growing up and the team he hoped would draft him in 2000 would be a storybook ending for the quarterback. It doesn't, however, make a whole lot of sense for the 49ers.
Adding Brady doesn't guarantee a Super Bowl any more than having Jimmy Garoppolo at this point. Brady will be 43 years old when the 2020 season kicks off. Garoppolo, 28, has several more years of football left in front of him.
And no, Peter King, the 49ers can't keep both Brady and Garoppolo. They don't have the $50 million or so available needed to retain two high-priced quarterbacks. That won't happen, and adding Brady would mean trading away Garoppolo.
Even if they could keep both quarterbacks, is that what Brady wants? We all know what happened in New England with Brady having to look over his shoulder toward Garoppolo, who was seen by head coach Bill Belichick as the future Hall of Famer's eventual replacement.
Let's say Brady plays another two years. What happens after that? San Francisco will be left back where it was in 2017 — searching for a franchise quarterback. Unless head coach Kyle Shanahan falls in love with a quarterback in this or the next draft, or still has a longing for Kirk Cousins, getting rid of Garoppolo after two-and-a-half seasons doesn't make sense.
Suppose the 49ers liked a quarterback in this draft class. As of right now, the team only has six selections, and would probably love to not have to use one on a quarterback project. Of course, one can argue that trading Garoppolo would add to those draft picks, but there are potentially several options this offseason for quarterback-needy NFL teams.
Brady-to-49ers might be a storybook ending for him, but it could be a future nightmare for San Francisco. It's not like Shanahan and general manager John Lynch are searching for a way to win and are a quarterback away from doing so. They were in the Super Bowl last month and have successfully rebuilt a once-talent-depleted roster.
The media's analysis of Garoppolo seems to be focused on two playoff games and the fourth quarter of the Super Bowl. Forgotten are the pretty impressive 2019 regular season, three quarters of Super Bowl LIV, and his five-game win streak in 2017. It's funny how that last one is forgotten since much of the 2018 offseason chatter surrounding the 49ers was because of that.
Garoppolo's 3,978 passing yards in 2019 rank as the fourth-best in franchise history when it comes to a quarterback's single-season total. That's pretty impressive when you consider the quarterbacks who have played for the storied organization.
Al Sacco posted the following comparison between Garoppolo and another NFL quarterback who happens to be pretty good.
And none of that even factors in that the 49ers have already verbally committed to Garoppolo. They did so at the NFL Scouting Combine, and the team's general manager feels his quarterback hasn't even reached his potential yet.
"We're extremely proud of Jimmy and committed to Jimmy moving forward," Lynch said last week. "He's our guy. As I've said, from the day he walked into our building, he made us better, and we continue to feel that's the case. And that's the most exciting think about him, is the room for growth. He's not come close to hitting his ceiling."
So, if Garoppolo, who is 14 years younger than Brady, has his arrow pointed up, why would the 49ers take a chance on a quarterback who is seemingly descending?
Lynch using a word like "committed" and saying "he's our guy," would seemingly shut down any speculation that the 49ers might consider replacing Garoppolo, but it hasn't. Bayless, Sanders, and others like Mike Florio continue to push the narrative without considering its long-term impact.
This isn't a Manning-to-Broncos situation where Denver didn't have another option and couldn't figure out how to identify a quarterback of the future. Lynch and Shanahan are trying to sustain success, not peak for a year or two, and then start over. The Broncos are 27-37 since Peyton Manning rode off into the sunset after winning his second career championship.
The Brady to the Las Vegas Raiders, Los Angeles Chargers, Indianapolis Colts chatter, that's all fine. The speculation linking him to the 49ers is fun for the media, but it's not going to happen.
More San Francisco 49ers News
-
Why Kyle Juszczyk expects 49ers rookies to make an early impact
Three San Francisco 49ers rookies have caught the attention of fullback Kyle Juszczyk this offseason, and that's encouraging news for a team that could rely heavily on its first-year players during the 2026 campaign. The 49ers dealt with a rash of injuries last season, proving... -
Mac Jones on 49ers choosing Lance over him, why he was meant to join Shanahan
San Francisco 49ers quarterback Mac Jones recently joined the Bussin' with the Boys podcast for a wide-ranging conversation. Among the topics he discussed were the 49ers choosing Trey Lance over him in the 2021 NFL Draft, finally joining Kyle Shanahan's team four years later,... -
Analyst: 49ers offense the 'most dangerous' in the NFC West
Few are picking the San Francisco 49ers to win the NFC West in 2026. After all, the Los Angeles Rams enter the season as Super Bowl favorites, while the Seattle Seahawks are the defending NFC West champions. Still, one NFL Network analyst believes the 49ers boast the... -
49ers' Brock Purdy left out of ESPN's top-10 quarterback rankings
The debate over where San Francisco 49ers quarterback Brock Purdy ranks among the NFL's elite continues. ESPN's Jeremy Fowler continued his annual NFL position rankings this week, unveiling his list of the league's top quarterbacks. The rankings are based on feedback from NFL...