Among the forefront of the topic? Defensive tackle Arik Armstead, who is scheduled to make $23.9 million in 2023, and has been subject to restructure talks.
Earlier today, I highlighted why restructuring Armstead would be a mistake for the organization, listing out the details of his contracts and how the 49ers have much better options to create cap space.
However, a trade regarding Armstead would be even worse.
Contract
Armstead is scheduled to make $23.9 million in 2023 and $25.8 million in 2024, which certainly are high cap hits for a player entering his 30s.
However, it would be a massive mistake to think about moving the defensive tackle in 2023.
Because of the restructure that the 49ers did ahead of the 2022 season, Armstead currently holds a dead cap charge of $21.9 million, and would only save $2 million in 2023, which is unfeasible if the player isn't going to be on your roster.
If a trade were to be entertained, it would come in 2024 at the earliest, when Armstead's dead-cap charge would be $14.3 million, while the 49ers would save $11.5 million in cap space.
Value
Arik Armstead is one of the most underrated 49ers when he's healthy.
Many choose to box-score scout and see Armstead's sack numbers, but they don't paint the full picture at all.
Armstead is a three-down player, which the 49ers saw were extremely vital over depth during the 2022 season, and does both tasks at a high rate.
While he may not generate the sack numbers that his contract suggests, Armstead often eats up double teams, creating for his teammates, and consistently shows up in the playoffs, which is exactly what you pay for.
However, in terms of trade value, Armstead holds more value to the 49ers than other teams because they are unlikely to fetch a significant return for a 30-year-old defensive lineman with a big contract.
Without an extreme package in return, it doesn't make any sense for the 49ers to trade Armstead's, understanding the significant dead cap charge that comes with a trade in 2023.
Now, the 49ers could very well look to entertain offers in 2024, especially if they sign a high-caliber defensive tackle that commands a high salary, but it doesn't make sense to move the longtime 49er this offseason pre-June 1st.
Written By:
Writer/Reporter for 49ers Webzone
All articles by Rohan Chakravarthi
@RohanChakrav
YouTube Channel
Rohan Chakravarthi
Writer/Reporter for 49ers Webzone
All articles by Rohan Chakravarthi
More San Francisco 49ers News
-
Should the 49ers trade Mac Jones or retain him as a backup?
With Brock Purdy entrenched as the starter, the acquisition of Mac Jones as a backup in 2025 added a new dimension to the team's quarterback room. After navigating a challenging period in Foxborough, first-round draft pick Jones (15th overall) eventually made a successful... -
John Lynch: 49ers would need a 'fairly strong' offer to trade Mac Jones
Speculation continues to surround the future of San Francisco 49ers quarterback Mac Jones, who remains under contract through the 2026 NFL season. After stepping in for injured starter Brock Purdy in 2025, Jones delivered an impressive stretch that likely caught the attention... -
49ers trade proposals: Two Mac Jones deals, Brandon Aiyuk's value
Bleacher Report's Alex Ballentine looked at one trade for each NFL team, and three involved the San Francisco 49ers. Two centered on quarterback Mac Jones and one exploring the potential return for wide receiver Brandon Aiyuk. Trade proposal No. 1: Mac Jones to the Vikings In... -
Insider predicts 49ers pull off blockbuster trade for Maxx Crosby
There will be significant buzz surrounding Maxx Crosby at the NFL Scouting Combine in Indianapolis this week, and the San Francisco 49ers are expected to be among the teams doing their due diligence on the star pass rusher. After finishing the 2025 season ranked dead last in...