LISTEN: Are The 49ers Showing Their Hand? →
Kyle Terada-USA TODAY Sports

Kyle Terada-USA TODAY Sports


Colin Kaepernick should show up on Monday, but not for Mike Florio’s reasons

Apr 3, 2016 at 5:14 PM16


Videos are auto-populated by an affiliate. This site has no control over the videos that appear above.
To say that Mike Florio's agenda and thought process is rather tiresome would be an understatement. His latest article for Pro Football Talk states that San Francisco 49ers QB Colin Kaepernick, who is currently involved a poker match with the Niners and Denver Broncos, should report to the team's offseason program on Monday. I can completely agree with that, but not for the reasons or under the childish scenario that Florio lays out.

Here is what he had to say in his Sunday article.

"The 49ers, by giving Kaepernick permission to seek a trade, presumably don't truly want him. Which means that they'll eventually cut him. Which means that the 49ers will pay the difference between whatever he gets elsewhere for 2016 and his fully-guaranteed $11.9 million salary."

He continued with the following.

"So Kaepernick should show up, with proverbial bells (and maybe a Dolphins . . . or an Eagles . . . or a Michigan hat) on. And he should do the bare minimum, sending the message he doesn't want to be there while technically there. At some point (for example, before he pops an Achilles tendon like receiver Michael Crabtree did in 2013), the 49ers will dump him."

First off, Kaepernick should report to the 49ers because he is a professional. The physical aspect of the first two weeks of the offseason program only include strength and conditioning as well as rehabilitation. Kaepernick would be limited in the first aspect because he is still rehabbing from an injury. If the 49ers feel that he would be better served rehabbing elsewhere, like the Steadman Clinic in Colorado where he has been for much of the offseason, then that is between San Francisco and their contractually obligated employee.

Florio assumes that, during this whole fiasco, the 49ers don't really want Kaepernick anyway. That's a big assumption that would very much go against past behavior. If you are valuable to general manager Trent Baalke, then he wants you around. Kaepernick does have value to them. New head coach Chip Kelly has even stated that he is eager to work with him and is likely chomping at the bit to talk some football with him. However, that doesn't mean that Baalke is not willing to listen to or even pull the trigger on offers if a strong one comes across his desk.

The 49ers can certainly afford to eat Kaepernick's salary. That's something that the Broncos can't do with their very limited cap space. The 49ers have the stronger hand here as far as getting a trade deal done, not the Broncos.

Neither Denver nor Kaepernick are in a position to demand that the 49ers pay part of the quarterback's salary as part of a trade deal. The 49ers, whether it be the truth or not, have repeatedly said that they want Kaepernick and have no intention of releasing him. Kaepernick has lost trust in the organization and wants out. Denver needs a starting quarterback unless they plan to enter the season with Mark Sanchez or a rookie under center, which may be what happens if the Broncos wait for San Francisco to flinch. They want Kaepernick, who met with Denver general manager John Elway on Thursday at his home in the Denver area. Who exactly has the upper hand here? It's San Francisco, not Denver.

Why would the 49ers be interested in paying a player to play for another team when they say they want him on their roster? If general manager Trent Baalke took that deal, he has no business returning in 2017.

Add to that the risk of Kaepernick reporting to the 49ers and finally being able to talk football with his coaching staff and warming up to the idea that he may be ok giving it a go and being paid very well to do so. It's the Broncos that are playing a dangerous game here. From an organization standpoint, the 49ers would be very comfortable moving forward with Kaepernick on their roster and only giving up on – potentially – a low third-round Broncos draft pick, which we are not even sure is the offering.

Sure reporting on Monday may create an awkward situation for Kaepernick, given that his teammates have obviously heard a lot about what is going on. However, the 49ers themselves have reportedly told Kaepernick that the two parties understand there is a business side to the NFL, but that they want him there regardless. Following Florio's advice of doing the bare minimum would just make the already awkward situation worse.

Florio even went as far as attempting to discredit a report yesterday by Adam Schefter, a report that the ESPN insider quickly defended. Whatever Florio's agenda is, it is obvious that he would love to see San Francisco embarrassingly mugged by Denver of Kaepernick. Whether he reports to the 49ers or not, it should be for professional reasons worked out with his current employer and not the infantile scenario that Florio lays out.

Of course, this is all assuming that Kaepernick is not traded before the team reports on Monday.
The opinions within this article are those of the writer and, while just as important, are not necessarily those of the site as a whole.


16 Comments

  • Mark
    WHY is everyone so dead set on getting rid of Kap? The guy took us to a superbowl. Last season was an absolute cluster-f@#$. The o-line was terrible, Hyde was out, and the receivers went into witness protection. and please spare me on Gabbert. Kap is physical, fast, and has strong arm. If we chase some college rookie we are gunna take 10 more steps back. Wentz and Goff are not QB saviors......
    Apr 15, 2016 at 8:21 AM
    2
    Response: A lot of it originates from Kap himself reportedly not wanting to be in San Francisco anymore after losing trust in the organization.
  • Lucky Phil
    Screw the trade to DEN. Lets trade Kap, Ian Williams and Eric Reid for a Jets 3rd rd Wilkerson. Then trade down if Goff is unavailable and get me Dodd and Cravens. Add K. Correa with our 2nd if a OT is unavailable and K. Russell at CB in the 3rd. Don't %$@# this up Baalke.
    Apr 13, 2016 at 2:23 PM
    0
  • Lucky Phil
    Derbush, We did not receive two 6th rd picks from Den. We exchanged a 7th rd pick this yr. for DEN 6th rd. pick (a wash). We also received a 6th rd from Den. in 2017 = (in value) Den comp pick for not signing Davis. Do the math we received no value for Davis. As far as the rumors surrounding Kap, I have heard a lot stuff. One of the stories I heard was Den wants SF. to cover 4.9 mil of Kaps contract. If Elway squeezes money out of Jed I will really be impressed how Baalke f#$@ed up this trade.
    Apr 4, 2016 at 5:48 PM
    0
  • Derbucher
    Lucky Phil what in the world are you talking about? First Vernon Davis was traded for two 6 round pick, which isn't to bad for a person who was not producing for the 49ers or ended up not doing anything with the Broncos. Second where did you read that the 49ers are going to trade and pay for half of his salary. Third if anything Baalke is saving York money hence the huge salary cap.
    Apr 4, 2016 at 3:36 PM
    0
  • 49erLance
    Isn't NBC Sports sick of Florio making there company look bad , apparently not
    Apr 4, 2016 at 3:57 AM
    1
  • Lucky Phil
    Is Trent working for the Niners or the Broncos? First we trade V. Davis for nothing and now we are trading Kap to Denver and paying half his contract!!!? Hey Jed, If you haven't figured it already you need a new GM, this incompetent bastard is costing you millions.
    Apr 3, 2016 at 10:10 PM
    0
  • Lucky Phil
    By the time Trader Trent is done, Kap will be wearing tight orange pants and Baalke will be washing Elway's balls with his tonsils.
    Apr 3, 2016 at 10:00 PM
    1
  • Grant Rodgers
    Florio is a Niner hater and has many contradictory "insider" info. And if you call him out on it, he'll conveniently remove your comment. You should take everything he says with a grain of salt.
    Apr 3, 2016 at 7:32 PM
    2
  • vermonator
    Florio has know idea what's really going on. His insiders know insiders who know insiders. He's been out of the loop for a while.
    Apr 3, 2016 at 6:39 PM
    4
  • Brandon
    Great write-up David. I experienced the same eye-rolling reading Florio's piece as well. He's not getting released. They detested Jim Harbaugh and still kept him around for an entire year after potential trade talks. Whether he starts or sits, the team can (and should) easily roster him in 2016.
    Apr 3, 2016 at 6:27 PM
    5
  • Niner4Life
    Niners have the upper hand. Always have. Kap ain't taking a pay cut. Baalke ain't paying you squat. Unless........you sweet'n that deal. Otherwise we'll just keep him. Plain and simple
    Apr 3, 2016 at 6:01 PM
    3
  • Pillbusta
    This article is on point. Kap should be a pro and do his job. SF has the upper hand and is not the party looking to get a deal done. Kap and DEN want one another so they should make the accommodations and not SF
    Apr 3, 2016 at 5:57 PM
    2
  • RC
    Cannot understands the logic of paying Denver to take Colin. If they gave us their second round pick I might think otherwise, but if Denver and Colin like each other, let them solve their money problems, and soon.
    Apr 3, 2016 at 5:37 PM
    5
  • WildBill
    It behoves the media and some fans that the niners don't operate under the norm. That they don't do what THEY think is right. Never has it crossed their minds that the niners can. Because to them it doesn't make sense. The media, not just in sports think they are the be all and end all. The niners have the cap space. This is a new coaching staff. So they can do what they want. Most assume that why keep someone who doesn't want to be here...because they can. If the niners were dealing with cap space, then it might be more pressing for them. People think it is all about money, when it is really about power and control. To say the niners have to do this or that when the evidence says otherwise pisses the media off, because they want to show the tail can wag the
    Apr 3, 2016 at 5:35 PM
    1
  • Frank M
    David, exactly right. I don't trust Florio...he's got a hugely over-inflated ego. If I hear a report from Schefter or Ian Rappoport, I'll believe it...they're very seldom wrong. As for Kap reporting, it's what he's supposed to do since he's under contract with the Niners. Florio doesn't seem to get it's Denver who's pushing for this trade, not the Niners. Elway's making a foolish attempt to get Baalke to pay almost $5M of Kap's contract. I thought those two were friends...that's not how you treat a friend, especially in business.
    Apr 3, 2016 at 5:33 PM
    3
  • don
    Hard to believe $4.9 million is stopping this deal from getting done..
    Apr 3, 2016 at 5:28 PM
    1

Facebook Comments



More San Francisco 49ers News



Should the 49ers be worried about Christian McCaffrey's workload?

By Al Sacco
Apr 11

It's not an exaggeration to say that RB Christian McCaffrey is coming off one of the best individual seasons in the history of the San Francisco 49ers. In his first full year in red and gold, McCaffrey led the NFL in rushing yards (1,459), total yards (2,023) and total touchdowns (21) on his way to becoming Offensive Player of the Year. His yards on the ground were the fourth most ever for a Niners running back and his 21 touchdowns trailed only WR Jerry Rice's team record of 23, which the Hall of Famer accomplished in just 12 games in 1987. McCaffrey was also prolific in the passing game, hauling in 67 receptions and often providing a safety net for QB Brock Purdy. Because McCaffrey has meant so much to Kyle Shanahan's scheme, it's easy to see why the offense



No Huddle Podcast: 49ers Offseason Musings With Legendary Columnist Mike Silver

By Site Staff
Apr 16

(Episode 330) — Legendary columnist Mike Silver joins the show to discuss the Brandon Aiyuk trade rumors and trade value, priorities in the secondary, Mike's book, and more! You can read Mike's work at the San Francisco Chronicle. The audio for the show is embedded above. Remember to subscribe! You can watch the interview below. You can listen to the latest "No Huddle Podcast" episode above, from



Mike Silver on how Deebo Samuel's contract might be the starting point for a Brandon Aiyuk extension

By Al Sacco
Apr 16

With the 2024 NFL Draft less than a week away, it's common for the rumor mill to start churning, especially with players who are actively seeking a new contract. It was just two short years ago that WR Deebo Samuel requested a trade from the San Francisco 49ers prior to draft day, only for cooler heads to prevail and eventually agree to a new deal. Now, it's WR Brandon Aiyuk's turn to try and get paid and rumors surfaced over the weekend that he too would request to be dealt. While that report was quickly shot down by his agent, there's still a lot of discussion about Aiyuk's future and if other teams will come calling on draft night. Legendary columnist Mike Silver joined



Tom Brady 'not opposed' to NFL return with a playoff-bound team like the 49ers

By David Bonilla
Apr 11

Just when you thought the San Francisco 49ers and Tom Brady storylines had concluded, the future Hall of Fame quarterback drops another tidbit that sparks discussion. During an episode of "DeepCut with VicBlends," the host asked Brady what he would do if the NFL came calling once again. VicBlends inquired if Brady would consider returning to the football field if a playoff-bound team like the 49ers needed him. "I'm not opposed to it," Brady said, per Jordan Mendoza of USA Today. "I don't know if they're gonna let me if I become an owner an NFL team. I don't know, I'm always gonna be in good shape, always be able to


Latest

More by David Bonilla

More Articles

Share 49ersWebzone