Told me what, exactly?
After week two, you were moaning about the "talent gap" between us and Seattle. You complained that the Seahawks were "simply better, and they'd beat us at the Clink, at the ‘Stick, or on the moon." And I told you that you were overreacting. I told you that by December we'd have a "title-worthy receiving corps," and I told you we'd show that we're better. And that's precisely what we did.
As I recall, though, you also told me more than that. You told me we'd win the division, since Seattle was just an "average" road-team. You told me we'd avoid a playoff trip to that rainsoaked hellhole. And you told me you knew how important that was; you ADMITTED it: "We go there, we lose." So I'm not quite sure what you're crowing about. We got a nice win, but too little too late. Seattle's got home field in the bag, and that means they're going. The season's over; you said it yourself.
Okay, just wait a minute. Yeah, I know, I promised you the division, and if the Texans, Rams, and Bucs hadn't wet their pants against Seattle, we'd have it. But Seattle got lucky, again and again, so yeah, we're gonna have to go back. You're taking me too literally, though. Obviously I didn't mean that it's IMPOSSIBLE for us to win there; we won there two years ago, for cryin' out loud. And don't forget: home field in the playoffs has meant less and less; in the past 20 years, only twice have the #1 seeds gone on to the Super Bowl. The playoffs are about who's hot and who's healthy, and we're gonna be just hitting our stride. It'll be tough, but we'll go there and win.
Sounds great, but now you're just dreaming. Sure, we won there two years ago, but that was BEFORE Russell Wilson and the Legion of ‘Shrooms. Seattle now just has it all. They've got a great team (though they still get away with too many fouls), and they've got a great crowd (though the noise is mostly just stadium design). I hate them with every fiber of my soul, but it's time to face the tough reality. We've had our shot, and we've blown it. This is THEIR year, and they might have many more years to come.
Calm down. Take a close look at Sunday's game. Our defense was dominant, holding down both Russell Wilson (2-of-8 beyond 10 yards) AND Marshawn Lynch (only 22 yards after halftime). Our special teams, despite one lapse in coverage, were spectacular. And our offense, which couldn't do a thing against Carolina and New Orleans, racked up 318 yards against the league's stingiest D. Yeah, I know, the score was close. But we were the better team by a mile, and that had nothing to do with a home-field advantage. (I highly doubt that the Seahawks were bothered by our "celebratory battle cry" of "Ahhh-Oooo, Ahhh-Oooo, Ahhh-Oooo!")
I'm going to pretend that you didn't just cite our "Home Field Advantage Plan," the most mortifying document since the invention of the written word. Let's get back to Sunday's game. Our defense and special teams were indeed magnificent. But let's take a look at that offense you're so proud of. There's no question that Michael Crabtree's miraculous return has injected some life into the passing game. (Mario Manningham's return, unfortunately, has been much less miraculous.) There's also no question that Greg Roman has started to play around with it more, relying far less on two backs and two tights. However, something's still fundamentally wrong. We continue to run into stacked boxes, even on long-distance downs. And then, when we pass, we're rarely scheming receivers open, and we're hardly using the backs at all. Put another way, the West Coast Offense should make things easy, but everything we're doing looks hard. Hence our persistent trouble on third down and in the red zone. Oh, and I love how you say that we "racked up" 318 yards, while failing to note that 51 of those yards were one play, which averted what looked like a certain defeat. Yet we were "the better team by a mile"? Keep dreaming, friend.
Don't you see what you're doing? You're acknowledging that "we're gonna have issues" against good teams, yet you're assuming that we'll solve those issues based on how we've looked against BAD teams. By now we know what this team is, and you've just described it perfectly. By and large, we look good against bad teams, and bad against good teams. But guess what? In the playoffs, there aren't ANY bad teams. And it's not like we've got plenty of time to work out these "issues." It's mid-December, for crissake. You're counting on this team becoming something it hasn't been all year. That just can't happen.
Sure it can. Last year, the Ravens lost four of their five December games. The year before, the Giants were 7-and-7 with two games to go. They both got hot at the perfect time; they both snuck in and won it all.
What you're forgetting is that this has been the plan all year. Just hold on ‘til the receivers come back, and then take off when they do. Sure it's not an ideal plan, but we've played the hand we were dealt in May. And now that we've beaten Seattle—a GOOD team, and perhaps the best—we're likely to finish at 12-and-4, riding a six-game winning streak. Going into the playoffs, we'll be as hot as anyone there.
So don't worry so much. Jim Harbaugh knows what he's doing. (To a lesser extent, Greg Roman does too.) We will go back up to Seattle, and when we do, we'll be playing at a championship level, better than we have all year. Naturally, that game will be tough. But here's one thing I know, beyond any doubt.
They won't want to see us coming.
