"The Garoppolo situation has been less messy, other than the surgery," one NFL executive told Graziano. "That makes you think, once he's healthy, San Francisco has the better chance to get something done."
Nothing is certain, though. The number of quarterback-needy teams has been significantly reduced since March, when Garoppolo underwent shoulder surgery, halting all trade talks.
The Carolina Panthers remain a possibility. Although, they are reportedly in no rush to take on the veteran quarterback's hefty salary.
San Francisco would like to avoid releasing Garoppolo, allowing him to sign with the division-rival Seattle Seahawks while the Niners receive nothing in return. However, something will need to be done before Week 1.
"As it stands now, San Francisco could cut Garoppolo and take on only $1.4 million in dead money against its salary cap," Graziano explains. "If it waits until after Week 1 to cut him, that number would jump to $26.4 million."
What is the most likely outcome for Garoppolo and Mayfield?
"The majority of the people to whom I spoke for this story believe both players will likely end up being released," Graziano shared. "A couple of people thought Garoppolo might still draw trade interest, provided an acquiring team could work out something to knock down the salary or spread it out over a couple of years."
Graziano says the Panthers remain the most popular destination for Garoppolo, should the 49ers manage to pull off a trade instead. The ESPN writer also mentions the Seahawks and Atlanta Falcons as possibilities. However, neither will likely consider the quarterbacks if they aren't released.
"The Browns and 49ers likely hope other teams' situations change and the market widens," Graziano added. "Perhaps a quarterback suffers an injury at the position, and they can do something like the Eagles did in 2016 when they sent Sam Bradford to the Vikings right before the season when Teddy Bridgewater got hurt. Perhaps a team that feels good about its quarterback situation gets into camp and that changes, then revisits the idea of a trade."
Then you have the worst-case scenario submitted to Graziano by one of those with whom he had discussions.
"Why not trade them for each other?" the individual suggested. "San Fran saves some money, Cleveland gets a better backup option than [Jacoby] Brissett. Baker gets to work with Kyle [Shanahan] for a year and be next year's [Mitchell] Trubisky."
More San Francisco 49ers News
-
49ers' most important position battle features Ricky Pearsall
Left guard is expected to be one of the most closely watched position battles for the San Francisco 49ers during training camp. However, offensive line competitions rarely generate the same level of attention as battles at the skill positions. In a recent article identifying... -
49ers facing harsh reality as NFL execs label Brandon Aiyuk 'untradeable'
There appears to be no trade market for San Francisco 49ers wide receiver Brandon Aiyuk, despite the team's hope that interest could eventually develop. With rival teams believing the 49ers will ultimately release the disgruntled receiver, there is little incentive to surrender... -
NFL execs: 49ers could use in-season Mac Jones trade to bolster roster
The San Francisco 49ers never seriously entertained the idea of trading quarterback Mac Jones, especially after he stepped in for an injured Brock Purdy last season and helped keep the offense on track. However, with Jones entering the final year of his contract, 2026 could... -
49ers defense ranks among NFL's least expensive units in 2026
The San Francisco 49ers head into the 2026 season with approximately $72 million in salary cap space, the most in the NFL by a wide margin, according to OverTheCap.com. The next-closest team, the Tennessee Titans, has nearly $50 million in available cap space. However, much of...